Another option would be to use Sieve or another type of server side
filter. This way, you would have a few options. You could reject it,
discard it, or redirect the message elsewhere. Just an idea, but like
the others have said, I wouldn't use SA for it.
metts
Michael Connors wrote:
Dennis Davis wrote:
>Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Michael Connors wrote:
>>
>
Received: from [87.198.136.186] (helo=[10.1.1.125])
by mail.go2.ie with esmtpa (Exim 4.52)
id 1HUjCF-0005Fo-62; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:48:43 +0000
Message-ID: <4603CCAC.7030702 (AT) go2 (DOT) ie>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:48:44 +0000
From: Michael Connors <michaelc (AT) go2 (DOT) ie>
To: Loren Wilton <lwilton (AT) earthlink (DOT) net>
CC: users (AT) spamassassin (DOT) apache.org
Subject: Re: Blocking mail from one specific user to another
I see, I didn't understand the syntax of the rules before, now I
understand. Thank you, I will try that.
>>
>As indicated elsewhere in this thread, this is best done by the MTA
>and not SpamAssassin.
>>
>You appear to be using exim as your MTA. At least that's what's
>indicated by:
>>
>
Received: from [87.198.136.186] (helo=[10.1.1.125])
by mail.go2.ie with esmtpa (Exim 4.52)
id 1HUjCF-0005Fo-62; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:48:43 +0000
>>
>So have a look at exim's wikki. This specific case is covered in:
>>
>
>
I will look into that.
Thanks for your answers.
regards,
Michael