Unix/Linux

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • how do I connect Debian to Cox Cable modem successfully

    11 answers - 2555 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    All,
    I've just been gifted with a Cox Cable TV/Internet/Phone(someday)
    hookup.
    The TV works (naturally), the phone is vaporware until they "enable my
    neighborhood", but the Internet works if you're an MS-Windows user.
    My connection is live, I can see data being exchanged when I try to
    connect (via the connection "ADSL/PPPoE" tool, the only thing looking
    even close to appropriate), but the connection fails with a message
    whose most useful content seems to be "Sorry, I scanned one
    [Ethernet] interface but the Access Concentrator of your provider
    did not respond."
    1) Is what I'm attempting even possible, or must I buy a dual-boot
    computer ("brokenputer" and "slowputer" are both
    Debian/KDE/SimplyMEPIS lashups, but far past their working lives)
    and only see the Internet from the WinXP side? [Bummer.] That is,
    does the Cox Cable Modem service work through Debian Linux for
    anyone reading this?
    2) Before I natter at Cox, do I need a different connection tool than
    the ADSL/PPPoE one? If so, what, and where do I get it, or do I
    already have it and just not recognize it?
    3) Will I need other information from Cox, like the IP address for
    whatever an/their Access Concentrator is, or its hardware 6 byte
    universal identifier?
    4) Is the Cox Cable Modem service a "proxy" or a "direct internet
    connection" (and how would I discover the difference for myself)?
    If a proxy, I'm guessing I'll need to insert it as the proxy in each
    of my browsers, something I'm confident I can do, since that's
    how I'm communicating now. Would this have any implications on
    the connectivity problem I'm trying to solve now?
    5) Would it help to interpolate an 802.11g wireless service
    between the cable modem and my (several) computers, in terms
    of simplifying the (initial, get it working at all for one computer)
    connectivity issues? [Getting my wireless to connect in libraries
    seems fairly straightforward and well understood technology.]
    If so, how?
    6) Any other advice, dumbed down so my third grader could
    follow it step by step, that would let me make this work, would be
    appreciated, as would email memo copies of the postings, since
    right now my Internet access seems to be at the "once a week"
    level, and this newsgroup is busy enough to make finding
    responses among all the other multilogs after that long
    "challenging".
    xanthian.
  • No.1 | | 519 bytes | |

    In article <1140059574.832479.253450@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups. com>, Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
    My connection is live, I can see data being exchanged when I try to
    connect (via the connection "ADSL/PPPoE" tool, the only thing looking
    I have cable modem here. use dhcpcd. Cox as well as
    Cablevision and many other cable broadband services use dhcp NT
    PPPoE. Most of the time its pretty straightforward
    dhcpcd
    that should get you online.
    If your cablemodem is on eth1 then do this
    dhcpcd eth1
  • No.2 | | 3905 bytes | |


    Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
    All,

    I've just been gifted with a Cox Cable TV/Internet/Phone(someday)
    hookup.

    The TV works (naturally), the phone is vaporware until they "enable my
    neighborhood", but the Internet works if you're an MS-Windows user.

    My connection is live, I can see data being exchanged when I try to
    connect (via the connection "ADSL/PPPoE" tool, the only thing looking
    even close to appropriate), but the connection fails with a message
    whose most useful content seems to be "Sorry, I scanned one
    [Ethernet] interface but the Access Concentrator of your provider
    did not respond."

    1) Is what I'm attempting even possible, or must I buy a dual-boot
    computer ("brokenputer" and "slowputer" are both
    Debian/KDE/SimplyMEPIS lashups, but far past their working lives)
    and only see the Internet from the WinXP side? [Bummer.] That is,
    does the Cox Cable Modem service work through Debian Linux for
    anyone reading this?

    2) Before I natter at Cox, do I need a different connection tool than
    the ADSL/PPPoE one? If so, what, and where do I get it, or do I
    already have it and just not recognize it?

    3) Will I need other information from Cox, like the IP address for
    whatever an/their Access Concentrator is, or its hardware 6 byte
    universal identifier?

    4) Is the Cox Cable Modem service a "proxy" or a "direct internet
    connection" (and how would I discover the difference for myself)?
    If a proxy, I'm guessing I'll need to insert it as the proxy in each
    of my browsers, something I'm confident I can do, since that's
    how I'm communicating now. Would this have any implications on
    the connectivity problem I'm trying to solve now?

    5) Would it help to interpolate an 802.11g wireless service
    between the cable modem and my (several) computers, in terms
    of simplifying the (initial, get it working at all for one computer)
    connectivity issues? [Getting my wireless to connect in libraries
    seems fairly straightforward and well understood technology.]
    If so, how?

    6) Any other advice, dumbed down so my third grader could
    follow it step by step, that would let me make this work, would be
    appreciated, as would email memo copies of the postings, since
    right now my Internet access seems to be at the "once a week"
    level, and this newsgroup is busy enough to make finding
    responses among all the other multilogs after that long
    "challenging".

    xanthian.

    Hi;
    I'm new to linux and have just done a Debian 3.1r1 install (Sarge) - I
    have Cable Internet and a "wired" Router + Cable Modem - all using
    Ethernet (cat5) cabling (not USB!).
    My system self-configured the Internet during Setup. I also know I have
    DHCP enabled on the router (you can usually access BTH the Router
    -and- the Modem separately through a URL in your Web Browser e.g.,
    http://192.168.x.x) and note I also have a Dual boot system so at
    anytime I can configure from the other S (but not necessary). In your
    circumstance, perhaps a LiveCD will help you configure properly
    (Knoppix or Ubuntu or MEPIS, etc)

    I agree - ADSL/PPPoE is not appropriate for Cable internet - it's a
    TelCo thing (usually)

    In KDE - go to Kmenu (find) _Control Center_ listed under the "All
    Applications" heading -- expand "Internet and Network" and click
    "Proxy", ensure "Connect to the Internet Directly" is
    tickedApply/K (just like winblows - gawd = I'm starting to really
    despise this xDE - it's why (one reason) I loathe the recent NT Ses).

    Also use Kmenu System Info Center (Network Interfaces) for info
    (though I know how to obtain many of these parameters through the CLI),
    I'm not sure you are even familiar with CLI at all

  • No.3 | | 3013 bytes | |

    Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:12:54 -0800, Kent Paul Dolan wrote:

    All,

    I've just been gifted with a Cox Cable TV/Internet/Phone(someday)
    hookup.

    The TV works (naturally), the phone is vaporware until they "enable my
    neighborhood", but the Internet works if you're an MS-Windows user.

    My connection is live, I can see data being exchanged when I try to
    connect (via the connection "ADSL/PPPoE" tool, the only thing looking
    even close to appropriate), but the connection fails with a message
    whose most useful content seems to be "Sorry, I scanned one
    [Ethernet] interface but the Access Concentrator of your provider
    did not respond."

    1) Is what I'm attempting even possible, or must I buy a dual-boot
    computer ("brokenputer" and "slowputer" are both
    Debian/KDE/SimplyMEPIS lashups, but far past their working lives)
    and only see the Internet from the WinXP side? [Bummer.] That is,
    does the Cox Cable Modem service work through Debian Linux for
    anyone reading this?

    2) Before I natter at Cox, do I need a different connection tool than
    the ADSL/PPPoE one? If so, what, and where do I get it, or do I
    already have it and just not recognize it?

    3) Will I need other information from Cox, like the IP address for
    whatever an/their Access Concentrator is, or its hardware 6 byte
    universal identifier?

    4) Is the Cox Cable Modem service a "proxy" or a "direct internet
    connection" (and how would I discover the difference for myself)?
    If a proxy, I'm guessing I'll need to insert it as the proxy in each
    of my browsers, something I'm confident I can do, since that's
    how I'm communicating now. Would this have any implications on
    the connectivity problem I'm trying to solve now?

    5) Would it help to interpolate an 802.11g wireless service
    between the cable modem and my (several) computers, in terms
    of simplifying the (initial, get it working at all for one computer)
    connectivity issues? [Getting my wireless to connect in libraries
    seems fairly straightforward and well understood technology.]
    If so, how?

    6) Any other advice, dumbed down so my third grader could
    follow it step by step, that would let me make this work, would be
    appreciated, as would email memo copies of the postings, since
    right now my Internet access seems to be at the "once a week"
    level, and this newsgroup is busy enough to make finding
    responses among all the other multilogs after that long
    "challenging".

    xanthian.

    You should be connecting through a router, the router will take care of
    whatever protocol the cable company needs. You connect to the router
    through vanilla TCP/IP. The router also serves as a hardware firewall,
    and it allows you to share the connection with multiple machines. Routers
    cost almost nothing these days, one that has wireless capability costs
    slightly more.

  • No.4 | | 703 bytes | |

    In article <pan.2006.02.16.21.49.27.972117@yahoo.com>, General Schvantzkoph wrote:
    You should be connecting through a router, the router will take care of
    whatever protocol the cable company needs. You connect to the router
    through vanilla TCP/IP. The router also serves as a hardware firewall,
    Thats one way to do it. If you have a router. The P did not
    say he had one. I use one of my linux boxen as a router. It talks to
    Cablevision broadband via eth1 with dhcpcd and runs its own dhcpd
    server for my inhouse lan on eth0. Never had a problem with my
    arrangement after I figured out how to get dhcpd to leave eth1 alone
    and dhcpcd to only poll eth1 to the cable modem.
  • No.5 | | 1034 bytes | |

    Thursday 16 February 2006 14:49, General Schvantzkoph
    <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com(<pan.2006.02.16.21.49.27.972117@yahoo.com>)
    wrote:

    Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:12:54 -0800, Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
    >
    >I've just been gifted with a Cox Cable TV/Internet/Phone(someday)
    >hookup.
    >>

    You should be connecting through a router, the router will take care of
    whatever protocol the cable company needs.

    I recently set up a Linksys "broadband router with wireless" for someone
    without broadband. The manual was written for the clueless and since I had
    about two clues, I was confused about the device's capabilities.

    Might I expect that a device sold as a "broadband router with wireless" will
    negotiate the cable company's DHCP and/or PPPoE connection internally? It
    would be nice if it did, and the device appeared from the wired and
    wireless router side as just another router with NAT.
  • No.6 | | 2822 bytes | |

    Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:23:30 -0700, Jules Dubois wrote:

    Thursday 16 February 2006 14:49, General Schvantzkoph
    <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com(<pan.2006.02.16.21.49.27.972117@yahoo.com>)
    wrote:
    >
    >Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:12:54 -0800, Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
    >>

    I've just been gifted with a Cox Cable TV/Internet/Phone(someday)
    hookup.

    >You should be connecting through a router, the router will take care of
    >whatever protocol the cable company needs.
    >

    I recently set up a Linksys "broadband router with wireless" for someone
    without broadband. The manual was written for the clueless and since I
    had about two clues, I was confused about the device's capabilities.

    Might I expect that a device sold as a "broadband router with wireless"
    will negotiate the cable company's DHCP and/or PPPoE connection
    internally? It would be nice if it did, and the device appeared from the
    wired and wireless router side as just another router with NAT.

    Have you tried to dig the info out of Windows?
    Control Panel.Network.Properties(?) (sorry, don't use M$ Win-stuff) should
    provide you with lots of useful info.

    thing to look for in case of non-PC hardware: boxes that can interface
    between an external provider and your home-net has one port (usually
    marked 'WAN') and, spaced a bit away, up to 4,5 or even 8 ports marked
    'LAN'. Wireless thingies of course also have their antenna connector or
    fixed antenna. When you connect your PC-to-be-used-for-setup, you do it on
    the LAN-side.

    most (but experience shows unfortunately not all) routers you can
    change the connection type on the WAN-port (PPPoE, DHCP etc.) to match
    what your provider (be it cable, xDSL or whatever) requires. Your ISP's
    helpdesk should be able to tell you what they want - and don't let them
    put you off with "Don't worry, it's all on the install-CD. Just put that
    into your PC and Windows takes care of the rest." (been there)

    (In case you connect directly to your providers media-interface
    (cable/ADSL modem etc.) just read references to WAN as to your netcard in
    the PC.)

    IME the ISP doing run-of-the-mill Ethernet usually has a DHCP server. In
    this case just set the WAN-side for DHCP. In the no-server scenario they
    WILL be able to tell you what IP you should set up. Go for static, fixed
    or similar wording and put in the supplied numbers.
    Similar procedure for the other options.
    While you're at it, remember to disable ping, ssh and remote setup (SNMP?)
    on the WAN-port - go figure

    HTH

    Jan, Z1DKE.

  • No.7 | | 333 bytes | |

    Either a D-Link or a Linksys wireless router will work just fine and be
    very easy to configure, with Linux and the Motorola Surfboard you get
    from Cox. you can just use dhclient or pump and connect directly to
    the Surfboard. You might have to setup DNS IP's if dhcp doesn't get
    these for you.

  • No.8 | | 319 bytes | |

    Kent Paul Dolan wrote:

    [How do I get Cox Cable to work under Debian?]

    Thanks for all the responses, now to try to make them
    work, and to find and download the recommended
    software. A router is unfortunately out of the question,
    poverty is rife around my place.

    xanthian.

  • No.9 | | 190 bytes | |

    xanthian writes:
    A router is unfortunately out of the question, poverty is rife around my
    place.
    It is here to but I still have a router: an old Aptiva running
    Debian/Stable.
  • No.10 | | 436 bytes | |

    Kent Paul Dolan wrote:

    Thanks for all the responses, now to try to make them
    work, and to find and download the recommended
    software.

    Looks like something called "pump" may do the trick, it
    seems to incorporate a dhcp configuration capability. I
    couldn't install dhcpcd, it conflicted with a part of "pump"
    somehow.

    I'll check out "pump" when I get home.

    xanthian.

  • No.11 | | 1749 bytes | |

    "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.comwrote:
    Kent Paul Dolan wrote:

    >Thanks for all the responses, now to try to make
    >them work, and to find and download the
    >recommended software.


    Looks like something called "pump" may do the
    trick, it seems to incorporate a dhcp
    configuration capability. I couldn't install
    dhcpcd, it conflicted with a part of "pump"
    somehow.

    I'll check out "pump" when I get home.

    To bring closure on this thread

    Yes, "pump", with no parameters, ran silently for
    the default ethernet port eth0. That, after I
    followed the advice given here to set my proxy (for
    Konqueror and for Firefox) to "Direct Internet
    Connection", did indeed get me in contact with Cox
    Cable. More effort was still required, though, as
    the response was similar to: "sorry, ducks,
    automatic online configuration isn't one of your
    options". I then called the free long distance
    number for Cox Internet, and the nice operator at
    the other end took enough information to identify my
    hookup, pinged my cable modem to make sure it was
    accessible, and enabled my account. After power
    cycling the modem, rebooting my Debian box, and
    executing "pump" again in root mode, both Konqueror
    and Firefox were live to the internet when launched.

    Thanks again for all the clues and help. By the way,
    Cox Internet is blazingly fast for an at home
    connection. It is no T3 cable, but I got consistent
    download rates of 500kbps in off-peak use (7 AM
    local (MST)). I cannot tell you how thrilled I am
    not to be stuck going back to MS-Windows to use this
    Internet service.

    FYI

    xanthian.

Re: how do I connect Debian to Cox Cable modem successfully


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 2 + 1 =
QUESTION ON "Unix/Linux"

EMSDN.COM