DSM

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Experimental Handler Branch

    0 answers - 2509 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Danny Angus wrote:
    --
    As I'm being quoted please read my comment at the bottom
    1/2/07, Stefano Bagnara <apache (AT) bago (DOT) orgwrote:
    Noel J. Bergman wrote:
    I see all of the work here, and Norman explained on Skype
    what he and
    Stefano are doing, but this is not the way that we
    develop code. Please
    correct me if I am wrong, but I do not see a single
    message, much less a
    discussion, of the ideas, plans, etc., for this code.
    28/10/2006 Danny said about the
    "sandbox/mailet-refactorings" branch:
    Compromise my ass, this is my sandbox fork Muahahahh ! ;-)
    What I mean is, this project doesn't have to achieve
    consensus itself,
    as long as it helps us to understand what the underlying
    problems are
    which have resulted in no agreement for such a long time.
    After this fork is all done we won't have Mailet v3,
    we'll have a plan
    for Mailet v3, which might well include decisions which
    still need to
    be bottomed out.
    d.
    I replied to him
    ++1 You know I'm a fan of "code based proposals".
    I just put a "beware the DI fanatics" and a "beware the
    JNDI haters"
    signs near your sandbox :-P
    I worked on that sandbox with that spirit. Work toward something
    concrete to propose. If you have "signs" to put near this
    sandbox I will
    be really happy to read them.
    I preferred to avoid discussing the technical thing too
    much on the list
    because I had no idea of what I would have done there.
    I believe that proposals thrashed out in the sandbox area are good,
    and can go places where we wouldn't want James to go, they can ask
    more questions than they answer.
    But this project does still exist through the mailing lists, and
    experiments in the sandbox don't really mean much unless they at least
    start or end in discussions on the list.
    I'm 100% in favour of people demonstrating and experimenting in the
    sandbox, but please remember that the purpose is to illustrate or
    provoke discussions on the list.
    d.
    Which the guys have done in an admirable way today, also taking Robert's
    idea onboard of using a prefix [handlerapi-experiment]. All great to see and
    much appreciated.
    Cheers
    -- Steve
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org

Re: Experimental Handler Branch


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 8 + 7 =
QUESTION ON "DSM"

EMSDN.COM