"R.Wieser" <address@not.availablewrote in message
news:44cfc2c5$1$4526$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
Rod Pemberton <do_not_have@bitfoad.cmmschreef in berichtnieuws
eanldc$299b$1@news.ndhu.edu.tw
Hello Rod,
<snip>
So, I'm looking for a(n electronic copy of the) users-manual. If you
have one or know where to find one I would appriciate the information.
Nope.
Too bad, I could really use one.
A couple Yahoo searches pulled up this:
They appear to be valid, but run them through your virus checker anyway
You might also want to try a P2P network"valuable" old software tends to
collect on them.
Hey, did you ever find a solution for that network filesystem you
were writing? What was ituh, something with findfirst/findnext
Correct. The answer is Yes, and No. Yes, I think I have found a method
to
solve the not-closing of a communication-socket because a DS
find-first/next sequence does not know a find-close. The idea is to
regard
any find-first or -next as a seperate action, using the index stored in
the
DTA to signal to the other side which entry it needs to return.
, that could lead to problems when files get deleted or added to
that directory at the same time (files being skipped or appearing twice,
something I have not found a solution for)
And No, I have not implemented it yet : my intrest was pulled into another
direction.
Yeah, I've got too many projects going on too!
I'm not sure if I posted these. First is some stuff on SDA. Second is
"network" ramdisk.
Ted Davis' original idea of calling findnext repeatedly when findfirst is
called and caching the results locally, may be the only solution
Rod Pemberton