Networking

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Amanda 2.5.0 upgrade weirdness

    0 answers - 1583 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi,
    The upgrade to 2.5.0 three days ago has resulted in some odd problems,
    including failures to write to tape.
    The Exabyte VXA-2 robot reports
    /etc/amanda/DailySet1# mtx -f /dev/sg0 status
    Storage Changer /dev/sg0:1 Drives, 10 Slots ( 0 Import/Export )
    Data Transfer Element 0:Full (Storage Element 3 Loaded):VolumeTag =
    B0000003
    Storage Element 1:Full :VolumeTag=B0000001
    Storage Element 2:Full :VolumeTag=B0000002
    Storage Element 3:Empty:VolumeTag=
    Storage Element 4:Full :VolumeTag=B0000004
    Storage Element 5:Full :VolumeTag=B0000005
    Storage Element 6:Full :VolumeTag=B0000006
    Storage Element 7:Full :VolumeTag=B0000007
    Storage Element 8:Full :VolumeTag=B0000008
    Storage Element 9:Full :VolumeTag=B0000009
    Storage Element 10:Full :VolumeTag=B0000010
    and
    /etc/amanda/DailySet1# mt-st -f /dev/nst0 status
    SCSI 2 tape drive:
    File number=0, block number=0, partition=0.
    Tape block size 0 bytes. Density code 0x81 (DLT 15GB compressed).
    Soft error count since last status=0
    General status bits on (41010000):
    BT NLINE IM_REP_EN
    Yet amtape reports
    $ amtape DailySet1 current
    changer: got exit: 0 str: 3 10 1
    changer_query: changer return was 10 1
    changer_query: searchable = 0
    amtape: scanning current slot in tape-changer rack:
    changer: got exit: 0 str: 3 /dev/nst0
    slot 3: not an amanda tape (Invalid argument)
    changer-barcodes is empty. amlabel returns errors similar to amtape
    above. The tapes are not write-protected.
    Any ideas?

Re: Amanda 2.5.0 upgrade weirdness


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 7 + 6 =
QUESTION ON "Networking"

EMSDN.COM