The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: compliance with SCXML Working Draft)

NAVIGATION

CATEGORIES

Apache

REFERRENCE

If you have some good idea, Cilck and mail to us please...

LINKS

Home » Apache

The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: compliance with SCXML Working Draft)
6 answers - 997 bytes -
1/16/06, Tim Brien <tobrien (AT) discursive (DOT) comwrote:
<snip/>
this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
we're currently not a Member organization.
<snap/>
FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
the ASF and the W3C, and IM, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
member.
If we stare at the W3C member list
we see members such as:
* ASIS
* Mozilla
and it is probably time to float this thought at the ASF.
So, a couple of questions:
* Anyone else has any views on this?
* What would be the appropriate ASF forum to begin this conversation?
-Rahul
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
No.1 | | 1387 bytes | |
You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership

paul

Rahul Akolkar wrote:
1/16/06, Tim Brien <tobrien (AT) discursive (DOT) comwrote:
<snip/>

>this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
>we're currently not a Member organization.
>
<snap/>

FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
the ASF and the W3C, and IM, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
member.

If we stare at the W3C member list

we see members such as:

* ASIS
* Mozilla

and it is probably time to float this thought at the ASF.

So, a couple of questions:

* Anyone else has any views on this?
* What would be the appropriate ASF forum to begin this conversation?

-Rahul

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
No.2 | | 1269 bytes | |
1/18/06, Paul Libbrecht <paul (AT) activemath (DOT) orgwrote:
You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
<snip/>

Sounds good, thanks. Will move this to general@xml when I get a chance.

Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership

<snap/>

True, though the members only sections interest me, and may possibly
be of interest to others as well. I'll ask.
-Rahul

paul

Rahul Akolkar wrote:
1/16/06, Tim Brien <tobrien (AT) discursive (DOT) comwrote:
<snip/>
>
>this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
>we're currently not a Member organization.
>>
<snap/>

FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
the ASF and the W3C, and IM, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
member.
<snip/>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
No.3 | | 1769 bytes | |
Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick search gave me only this
though :

Mvgr,
Martin

Rahul Akolkar wrote:
1/18/06, Paul Libbrecht <paul (AT) activemath (DOT) orgwrote:

>>You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.

<snip/>

Sounds good, thanks. Will move this to general@xml when I get a chance.

>>Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership
>>

<snap/>

True, though the members only sections interest me, and may possibly
be of interest to others as well. I'll ask.
-Rahul

>>paul
>>
>>Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>
1/16/06, Tim Brien <tobrien (AT) discursive (DOT) comwrote:
<snip/>

this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join the W3C, but
we're currently not a Member organization.

<snap/>

FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
the ASF and the W3C, and IM, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
member.

<snip/>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
No.4 | | 634 bytes | |
1/18/06, Martin van den Bemt <mllist (AT) mvdb (DOT) netwrote:
Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick search gave me only this
though :

<snip/>

Cool, looks like this isn't the first time someone thought about this
(as I was fully expecting). Need to find the right people at either
end to see if we can make any further progress
-Rahul

Mvgr,
Martin

<snap/>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
No.5 | | 668 bytes | |
1/18/06, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

1/18/06, Martin van den Bemt <mllist (AT) mvdb (DOT) netwrote:
Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick
search gave me only this
though :

<snip/>

Cool, looks like this isn't the first time someone thought about this
(as I was fully expecting). Need to find the right people at either
end to see if we can make any further progress

At this end, I'd suggest starting with community@a.o, since that covers
people on all projects. Certainly commons-dev isn't the right place for a
broad audience. ;-)
No.6 | | 816 bytes | |
1/18/06, Martin Cooper <martinc (AT) apache (DOT) orgwrote:
1/18/06, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

<snip/>

Cool, looks like this isn't the first time someone thought about this
(as I was fully expecting). Need to find the right people at either
end to see if we can make any further progress
--
At this end, I'd suggest starting with community@a.o, since that covers
people on all projects. Certainly commons-dev isn't the right place for a
broad audience. ;-)

<snap/>

Just testing the waters ;-) Will go to community@ in a day or two
then, and might ping general@xml about the thread on community@ since
I tend to agree to an extent with Paul (and all of them might not be
on community@)
-Rahul

Re: The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: compliance with SCXML Working Draft)

QUESTION ON "Apache"

EMSDN.COM

Question 'The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: compliance with SCXML Working Draft)' on 'Apache'

Apache

The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: compliance with SCXML Working Draft)