Hi,
Consider 2 x edge routers connecting to same ISP.
Each router taking full BGP routes with AS prepends on the HSRP standby box so traffic in/out only over the primary box. Also has static default route to ISP neighbour.
Each of these routers share the same L2 brodcast domain on a switched network internally.
L2 domain is being upgrade with 6500's, VLAN's, HSRP, VACL's etc.
Routed /32's will connect each of the 2 x 6500's to each of the edge routers.
Is it best to keep things static, and for example, define weighted static default routes on the 6500's to the primary/secondary boxes? is dynamic the way to go?
Any thoughts appreciated.
Mark
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp (AT) puck (DOT) nether.net
archive at

PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
Hash: SHA1

Mark Tohill wrote:
Hi,

Consider 2 x edge routers connecting to same ISP.
Each router taking full BGP routes with AS prepends on the HSRP standby box so traffic in/out only over the primary box. Also has static default route to ISP neighbour.
Each of these routers share the same L2 brodcast domain on a switched network internally.

L2 domain is being upgrade with 6500's, VLAN's, HSRP, VACL's etc.
Routed /32's will connect each of the 2 x 6500's to each of the edge routers.

Is it best to keep things static, and for example, define weighted static default routes on the 6500's to the primary/secondary boxes? is dynamic the way to go?

Any thoughts appreciated.

As with most things, what would changing accomplish for you or what are you
trying to achieve that you are not getting now?
- --
bep

PGP SIGNATURE
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

163a2lb3E/fmZdtS2MYrtpc=
=FIn1
PGP SIGNATURE

cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp (AT) puck (DOT) nether.net

archive at