Networking

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • SCCP segmentation

    3 answers - 283 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hello,
    It seems that SCCP (with TCAP payload) re-assembly (XUDTs) is not
    supported in Ethereal.
    Anyone already looked at it? Any thoughts?
    I have a trace I can send on demand.
    Ethereal-dev mailing list
    Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com
  • No.1 | | 536 bytes | |

    Hi ,

    you are correct, SCCP reassembly is currently not implemented.

    Best regards
    Michael

    Jan 18, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jacques, (CBU-Test Infra) wrote:

    Hello,

    It seems that SCCP (with TCAP payload) re-assembly (XUDTs) is not
    supported in Ethereal.
    Anyone already looked at it? Any thoughts?

    I have a trace I can send on demand.

    Ethereal-dev mailing list
    Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com

    Ethereal-dev mailing list
    Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com
  • No.2 | | 1032 bytes | |

    I think it should not be hard to do it based of the binding_info.

    Beware that if (binding == &no_binding) we do not have a binding so
    you should not reassemble or else we'll have trouble.

    BTW: binding is not the propper name, session or call might be better names

    Luis

    1/18/06, Anders Broman <a.broman (AT) telia (DOT) comwrote:
    Hi,
    I'm looking into it.
    Brg
    Anders

    Hi ,

    you are correct, SCCP reassembly is currently not implemented.

    Best regards
    Michael

    Jan 18, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jacques, (CBU-Test Infra) wrote:

    Hello,

    It seems that SCCP (with TCAP payload) re-assembly (XUDTs) is not
    supported in Ethereal.
    Anyone already looked at it? Any thoughts?

    I have a trace I can send on demand.

    Ethereal-dev mailing list
    Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com

    Ethereal-dev mailing list
    Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com

    --

    Ethereal-dev mailing list
    Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com
  • No.3 | | 1703 bytes | |

    I'd been meaning to take a look at the binding_info stuff. Is it
    basically equivalent to a conversation for SCCP? (I had always
    envisioned using/adapting the conversation stuff to SCCP to keep track
    of Class-2 stuff but have never had time.)

    LEG wrote:
    I think it should not be hard to do it based of the binding_info.

    Beware that if (binding == &no_binding) we do not have a binding so
    you should not reassemble or else we'll have trouble.

    BTW: binding is not the propper name, session or call might be better names.

    Luis

    1/18/06, Anders Broman <a.broman (AT) telia (DOT) comwrote:
    >Hi,
    >I'm looking into it.
    >Brg
    >Anders
    >>

    >Hi ,
    >>

    >you are correct, SCCP reassembly is currently not implemented.
    >>

    >Best regards
    >Michael
    >>

    >Jan 18, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jacques, (CBU-Test Infra) wrote:
    >>

    Hello,

    It seems that SCCP (with TCAP payload) re-assembly (XUDTs) is not
    supported in Ethereal.
    Anyone already looked at it? Any thoughts?

    I have a trace I can send on demand.

    Ethereal-dev mailing list
    Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com

    >
    >Ethereal-dev mailing list
    >Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com
    >
    >>
    >>

    >
    >Ethereal-dev mailing list
    >Ethereal-dev (AT) ethereal (DOT) com
    >
    >>

Re: SCCP segmentation


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 0 + 9 =
QUESTION ON "Networking"

EMSDN.COM