Networking

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • MX question

    1 answers - 737 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    hi folks,
    I have a customer's dns server (bind - not sure of version) not able to
    resolve my mx records to one of my zones. Here are my current records:
    100 mydomain.com.s5a1.psmtp.com.
    200 mydomain.com.s5a2.psmtp.com.
    I'm being told from the customer that my mx records are formatted
    improperly. His argument is that his version of bind is unable resolve the
    mx record when the domain name _does not_ appear at the end of the record
    (ie s5a1.psmtp.com.mydomain.com would work fine for him).
    Is this is a known problem with some versions of bind?
    Can someone point me to documentation that tells me proper/illegal syntax
    for my mx records.
    Thanks,
    Jim
  • No.1 | | 2511 bytes | |

    Hopefully you are reading the forum because it looks like you are in fact having
    email problems. DNS isn't your problem. Your email server doesn't know who you
    are:
    The original message was received at Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:39:02 -0700
    from iago [127.0.0.1]

    The following addresses had permanent fatal errors
    <jim (AT) compton (DOT) net>
    (reason: 550 <jim (AT) compton (DOT) net>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
    virtual alias table)

    Transcript of session follows
    while talking to compton.net.mail1.psmtp.com.:
    RCPT To:<jim (AT) compton (DOT) net>
    <<< 550 <jim (AT) compton (DOT) net>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual
    alias table
    550 5.1.1 <jim (AT) compton (DOT) netUser unknown

    You DNS resolves fine:
    # dig compton.net mx

    ; <<>DiG 9.2.4 <<>compton.net mx
    ;; global options: printcmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NERRR, id: 12239
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHRITY: 2, ADDITINAL: 0

    ;; QUESTIN SECTIN:
    ;compton.net. IN MX

    ;; ANSWER SECTIN:
    compton.net. 300 IN MX 200 compton.net.mail2.psmtp.com.
    compton.net. 300 IN MX 300 compton.net.mail3.psmtp.com.
    compton.net. 300 IN MX 400 compton.net.mail4.psmtp.com.
    compton.net. 300 IN MX 100 compton.net.mail1.psmtp.com.

    ;; AUTHRITY SECTIN:
    compton.net. 172800 IN NS ns2.compton.net.
    compton.net. 172800 IN NS ns1.compton.net.

    ;; Query time: 118 msec
    ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
    ;; WHEN: Tue Aug 22 09:59:00 2006
    ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 210

    Quoting Jim <jim (AT) compton (DOT) net>:

    hi folks,

    I have a customer's dns server (bind - not sure of version) not able to
    resolve my mx records to one of my zones. Here are my current records:

    100 mydomain.com.s5a1.psmtp.com.
    200 mydomain.com.s5a2.psmtp.com.

    I'm being told from the customer that my mx records are formatted
    improperly. His argument is that his version of bind is unable resolve the
    mx record when the domain name _does not_ appear at the end of the record
    (ie s5a1.psmtp.com.mydomain.com would work fine for him).

    Is this is a known problem with some versions of bind?
    Can someone point me to documentation that tells me proper/illegal syntax
    for my mx records.

    Thanks,

    Jim
    >
    >
    >

Re: MX question


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 4 + 3 =
QUESTION ON "Networking"

EMSDN.COM