I am using the 2.2 pre release with a lot of success but like you am hoping that the committer become active again. I wish I had more time to become a committer myself but unfortunately that is not possible. So instead I try to answer questions and post patches for any bugs that I fix.
Message
From: Fabrice Dewasmes [mailto:fabrice.dewasmes (AT) openwide (DOT) fr]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:59 AM
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Lucene prop search and ACLs
Ray Sprinkle wrote:

>You may have noticed that Slide updates and releases have been slow
>lately. Many patches exist in bugzilla that have never been applied.
>When the committers (a new one was just added to the project) become
>active again, they will want these patches to fix bugs. Your part in
>this involves bugzilla. See if there is already a bug in bugzilla, if
>not add one. Attach your patch to the bug if one isn't already there.
>
>I am not a committer to Slide but I use it a lot. When I come across a
>bug I add it to bugzilla. I answer questions here and
>try to keep other people from tripping over the same issues that I have had.
>Since I don't use the Lucene searches yet, but will be in the near
>future, I personally would greatly appreciate any bug fixes that you
>submit.
>
>Thanks
You're perfectly right Ray,
I've submitted patches myself 6 months ago and they've never been committed. After a while, I've noticed that no activity is going on the repository and thought the project was stalled. This can lead one to stop doing the effort of submitting patches.
Anyway, I'm glad someone is going to take over the next step and I'm looking forward to seeing release 2.2.
regards,
Fabrice
Message
>From: Fabrice Dewasmes [mailto:fabrice.dewasmes (AT) openwide (DOT) fr]
>Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 9:19 AM
>To: Slide Users Mailing List
>Subject: Re: Lucene prop search and ACLs
>
>Max Pfingsthorn wrote:
>

>
>>You have to edit
>
>>
>
>e
>ssion.java.

>
>>Just add another try/catch in execute() (around lines 162-163 in svn
>>trunk)
>>
>>try {
>RequestedResource resource = createResource(uri, nodeNumber);
>result.add(resource);
>>} catch(SlideException IGNRE) {}
>>
>>max
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>This is also what we did but can't this be patched on svn ?
>
>regards,
>
>Fabrice
>
Message
From: Bart Frackiewicz [mailto:bf (AT) open-medium (DOT) com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 14:27
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Lucene prop search and ACLs
Hello,
i am using Slide 2.2pre1 (build in November) from CVS with
Lucene-based properties search. The search works fine for me except
one case:
if i search (logged in as guest user) for a phrase, which is part of
a
non-accessible file, the search method response me a 400 BAD REQUEST
error:
<D:multistatus xmlns:D="DAV:">
<D:response>
<D:href>
</D:href>
<D:status>
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
</D:status>
<D:responsedescription>
Access denied on /files/nur fuer root/anderedatei.txt by
user /users/guest
for action /actions/read
</D:responsedescription>
</D:response>
</D:multistatus>
I think, the search method should ignore non-accessible files. Has
someone a workaround for this?
Best regards,
Bart