Hi all,
I saw that glassfish/mail had new commits a couple of weeks ago that
fixed some of the bugs I reported few months ago.
I also saw that the java.net maven repository is publishing a build from
15/Sep/2006 declaring the CDDL license (previous EA was not under this
license) and I verified that compiling the CVS version I obtained the
same bytecode that was in the maven repository.
I downloaded it, decommented all the code we previously added to
workaround few javamail bugs and decommented the code to support
8bitmime (we removed it because of javamail bugs) and everything seems
to work fine.
I also added few more tests and the result is good.
So I decided to commit it and let us and our users to test it so that we
have increased possibilities to have further problems discovered before
javamail 1.4.1 final will be out.
The main problem is that now the "next-release" depends on the release
of 2 final libraries:
dnsjava-2.0.3
javamail-1.4.1
Let's hope they won't be the showstoppers when everything else will be out.
Stefano
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org

10/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <apache (AT) bago (DOT) orgwrote:
Hi all,

I saw that glassfish/mail had new commits a couple of weeks ago that
fixed some of the bugs I reported few months ago.

I also saw that the java.net maven repository is publishing a build from
15/Sep/2006 declaring the CDDL license (previous EA was not under this
license) and I verified that compiling the CVS version I obtained the
same bytecode that was in the maven repository.

I downloaded it, decommented all the code we previously added to
workaround few javamail bugs and decommented the code to support
8bitmime (we removed it because of javamail bugs) and everything seems
to work fine.

I also added few more tests and the result is good.

So I decided to commit it and let us and our users to test it so that we
have increased possibilities to have further problems discovered before
javamail 1.4.1 final will be out.

The main problem is that now the "next-release" depends on the release
of 2 final libraries:

dnsjava-2.0.3
javamail-1.4.1

Let's hope they won't be the showstoppers when everything else will be out.

+1, testing the libraries early is a good thing. and I don't think we
are very much faster with releasing than the library developers ;-)

Bernd

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org

Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
10/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <apache (AT) bago (DOT) orgwrote:
>Hi all,
>>
>I saw that glassfish/mail had new commits a couple of weeks ago that
>fixed some of the bugs I reported few months ago.
>>
>I also saw that the java.net maven repository is publishing a build from
>15/Sep/2006 declaring the CDDL license (previous EA was not under this
>license) and I verified that compiling the CVS version I obtained the
>same bytecode that was in the maven repository.
>>
>I downloaded it, decommented all the code we previously added to
>workaround few javamail bugs and decommented the code to support
>8bitmime (we removed it because of javamail bugs) and everything seems
>to work fine.
>>
>I also added few more tests and the result is good.
>>
>So I decided to commit it and let us and our users to test it so that we
>have increased possibilities to have further problems discovered before
>javamail 1.4.1 final will be out.
>>
>The main problem is that now the "next-release" depends on the release
>of 2 final libraries:
>>
>dnsjava-2.0.3
>javamail-1.4.1
>>
>Let's hope they won't be the showstoppers when everything else will
>be out.
>
+1, testing the libraries early is a good thing. and I don't think we
are very much faster with releasing than the library developers ;-)

Bernd

I switched one server here to current trunk yesterday after Stefano made
the changes. No problems yet. So maybe we now really have 8bit workin :-)

bye
Norman

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org

10/5/06, Norman Maurer <nm (AT) byteaction (DOT) dewrote:
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
10/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <apache (AT) bago (DOT) orgwrote:
>The main problem is that now the "next-release" depends on the release
>of 2 final libraries:
>>
>dnsjava-2.0.3
>javamail-1.4.1
>>
>Let's hope they won't be the showstoppers when everything else will
>be out.
>
+1, testing the libraries early is a good thing. and I don't think we
are very much faster with releasing than the library developers ;-)

Bernd

I switched one server here to current trunk yesterday after Stefano made
the changes. No problems yet. So maybe we now really have 8bit workin :-)

ok, I see you want it for 2.3.0 ;-)

Bernd

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org

Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
10/5/06, Norman Maurer <nm (AT) byteaction (DOT) dewrote:
>Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
>10/4/06, Stefano Bagnara <apache (AT) bago (DOT) orgwrote:
>>The main problem is that now the "next-release" depends on the
>release
>>of 2 final libraries:
>>>
>>dnsjava-2.0.3
>>javamail-1.4.1
>>>
>>Let's hope they won't be the showstoppers when everything else will
>>be out.
>>
>+1, testing the libraries early is a good thing. and I don't think we
>are very much faster with releasing than the library developers ;-)
>>
>Bernd
>>
>I switched one server here to current trunk yesterday after Stefano made
>the changes. No problems yet. So maybe we now really have 8bit workin
>:-)
>
ok, I see you want it for 2.3.0 ;-)

Bernd

I want many things for 2.3.0. But i think we should be releastic ;-) So
maybe we can put out a 2.4 which support 8bit. Anyway i can also wait
for 3.0 or whatever version we use

bye
Norman

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org

Norman Maurer wrote:
Bernd Fondermann schrieb:
>ok, I see you want it for 2.3.0 ;-)
>>
>Bernd

I want many things for 2.3.0. But i think we should be releastic ;-) So
maybe we can put out a 2.4 which support 8bit. Anyway i can also wait
for 3.0 or whatever version we use

bye
Norman

We have to wait javamail 1.4.1 final, so we can skip any decision now ;-)

Stefano

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org