Standards

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Validation of atom feeds via rawdata fails

    0 answers - 1546 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi all,
    I've received a recent report that the "direct input" interface to
    the feed validator at http://validator.w3.org/feed/, which uses the
    rawdata feature of the feedvalidator, was failing for a number of
    atom feeds, but working just fine with other types of feed.
    Steps to reproduce:
    1) go to http://validator.w3.org/feed/
    2) paste in the "direct input" box the content of an atom feed, e.g
    3) Submit the form
    Result: validation fails, no error given
    Note that the service is using the latest svn code (as of Aug 18,
    2006), but the problem has been present at least since the last
    codebase sync, at the end of July.
    I have managed to tweak check.cgi a little to get a full trace of the
    problem (attached).
    The trace, to my untrained eye, does not seem to reveal anything
    particular other than the involvement of a few libraries other than
    the feedvalidator itself.
    My suspicion of a library incompatibility is further justified by the
    fact that my test service, running the exact same code for the
    feedvalidator but on an unstable debian distribution, returns
    (almost) correct validation results.
    (check by going to http://qa-dev.w3.org/feed/ and reproducing steps
    2, 3)
    Any idea what could be causing this issue? I believe that the "direct
    input" validation, however flawed (the document location and most
    relative links obviously get screwed), is useful, and I'd like to
    continue providing it.
    Thanks.

Re: Validation of atom feeds via rawdata fails


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 9 + 9 =
QUESTION ON "Standards"

EMSDN.COM