A link to your own blog is not support for your argument. That's
called circular reasoning.

In addition, if you had bothered to do a little research, you would
have noticed *huge* discrepancies.

Try here:

The unit he claimed he was in, was not deployed where he said it was.

His flash (patches, unit designations) on his uniform are either put
on incorrectly, not used by the division he claims to be in, and/or no
longer used by the military.

His uniform is wildly well, inconsistent is the best word here.

Some of the awards and citations he claims to have received would be
impossible to earn in the time he was active.

Really, I am constantly amazed by the lack of critical thinking people
exhibit these days. It doesn't take long to find actual citations to
back up a position. A loon talking in a video is *not* a credible
source. Unfortunately, people want to believe something that backs
their own opinions so much that they will take unsubstantiated stories
as truth and use that as evidence. course when someone points out
that "evidence" is fraud and fake Well, at best the person gets
ignored, at worst a tool of the vast neo-con conspiracy. (Seriously,
given the governments track record at keeping things secret a
"vast" conspiracy is ridiculous at best)

Hoax and fraud does nothing but weaken one's position regardless of
that position's overall merits.

9/11/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
!6ADE4614B66EADD2!1321.entry
--
11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
Uh. You do realize this was a hoax, right?

9/9/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

--

regards
c0ntex

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>
--

regards
c0ntex

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
Hash: SHA1

Really, I am constantly amazed by the lack of critical thinking people
exhibit these days.

You're not the only one.

Philosophil wrote:
A link to your own blog is not support for your argument. That's
called circular reasoning.

In addition, if you had bothered to do a little research, you would
have noticed *huge* discrepancies.

Try here:

The unit he claimed he was in, was not deployed where he said it was.

His flash (patches, unit designations) on his uniform are either put
on incorrectly, not used by the division he claims to be in, and/or no
longer used by the military.

His uniform is wildly well, inconsistent is the best word here.

Some of the awards and citations he claims to have received would be
impossible to earn in the time he was active.

Really, I am constantly amazed by the lack of critical thinking people
exhibit these days. It doesn't take long to find actual citations to
back up a position. A loon talking in a video is *not* a credible
source. Unfortunately, people want to believe something that backs
their own opinions so much that they will take unsubstantiated stories
as truth and use that as evidence. course when someone points out
that "evidence" is fraud and fake Well, at best the person gets
ignored, at worst a tool of the vast neo-con conspiracy. (Seriously,
given the governments track record at keeping things secret a
"vast" conspiracy is ridiculous at best)

Hoax and fraud does nothing but weaken one's position regardless of
that position's overall merits.

9/11/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
>!6ADE4614B66EADD2!1321.entry
>>
>>
>11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
>Uh. You do realize this was a hoax, right?
>>
>9/9/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
>
>>
>--
>>
>regards
>c0ntex
>>
>
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter:
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>--
>>
>regards
>c0ntex
>>

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- --
Troy Cregger
Lead Developer, Technical Products.
Kennedy Information, Inc
Phoenix Mill Ln, Fl 3
Peterborough, NH 03458
(603)924-0900 ext 662
PGP SIGNATURE
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

J1NwtfDvYdaKePgdZfzV7t4=
=AwcQ
PGP SIGNATURE

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

September 11, 2006 8:20:51 PM +0100 c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

You are entitled to your opinion.

Yeah, and it sucks this his is fact-based, doesn't it?

Paul Schmehl (pauls (AT) utdallas (DOT) edu)
Adjunct Information Security
The University of Texas at Dallas

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
Hash: SHA1

Everyone is but this guy Jesse seems to actually be a fraud. Most of
the sites that originally carried the story have pulled it and some
have
issued statements denouncing the use of fraud and misinformation as a
means to build opposition to the war.

Don't believe everything you see on the Internet.

c0ntex wrote:
You are entitled to your opinion.

11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
>A link to your own blog is not support for your argument. That's
>called circular reasoning.
>>
>In addition, if you had bothered to do a little research, you would
>have noticed *huge* discrepancies.
>>
>Try here:
>>
>
>>
>>
>The unit he claimed he was in, was not deployed where he said it was.
>>
>His flash (patches, unit designations) on his uniform are either put
>on incorrectly, not used by the division he claims to be in, and/or no
>longer used by the military.
>>
>His uniform is wildly well, inconsistent is the best word here.
>>
>Some of the awards and citations he claims to have received would be
>impossible to earn in the time he was active.
>>
>Really, I am constantly amazed by the lack of critical thinking people
>exhibit these days. It doesn't take long to find actual citations to
>back up a position. A loon talking in a video is *not* a credible
>source. Unfortunately, people want to believe something that backs
>their own opinions so much that they will take unsubstantiated stories
>as truth and use that as evidence. course when someone points out
>that "evidence" is fraud and fake Well, at best the person gets
>ignored, at worst a tool of the vast neo-con conspiracy. (Seriously,
>given the governments track record at keeping things secret a
>"vast" conspiracy is ridiculous at best)
>>
>Hoax and fraud does nothing but weaken one's position regardless of
>that position's overall merits.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>9/11/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
>!6ADE4614B66EADD2!1321.entry
>>
>>
>11/09/06, Philosophil <flosofl (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
>Uh. You do realize this was a hoax, right?
>>
>9/9/06, c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
>
>>
>--
>>
>regards
>c0ntex
>>
>
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter:
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>--
>>
>regards
>c0ntex
>>
>>

- --
Troy Cregger
Lead Developer, Technical Products.
Kennedy Information, Inc
Phoenix Mill Ln, Fl 3
Peterborough, NH 03458
(603)924-0900 ext 662
PGP SIGNATURE
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

go2Rd7fz7JCP+j5Z3J8rTFA=
=Ah
PGP SIGNATURE

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Now take a deep breath and chill out.
Noone has contradicted any of your claims, not here, not on wikipedia.

The only thing that has been said is that one single individual of the
many that reports on those issues has been discovered as a fake.

I for one is sure that a lot of what this and what other individuals have
reported is true and has happened.
But that doesn't mean that everyone who claims to have inside information
has.

And given that this individual is such an obvious fake using his statements
is actually hurting the truth, not helping it.

trick Saudi Arabia that Sadam Hussein was attacking their border to allow
army convoys to be deployed in their country,

Just had to comment on this one.
The trick they used was the known fact that Iraq occupied Kuwait.
Which isn't exaclty regarded as a trick, given that it was acknowleged
by all parties.

But I still think that the US 'liberation' if Iraq is one of the most
stupid, and possibly criminal, acts of foreign policy that has occured
for many many years.

And on this day when we remember the 3000 unarmed civilians who died in
the US I just hope that we don't forget the 30000 unarmed civilians who
died in Afghanistan shortly after.

// hdw

c0ntex wrote:
If you consider that America are able to lie about the weapons of mass
destruction and then admit it, use chemical weapons in Iraq and lie
about it and then admit it, trick Saudi Arabia that Sadam Hussein was
attacking their border to allow army convoys to be deployed in their
country, mishandle Iraqs millions of dollars which seemed to vanish
(which is currently under investigation with 3 confirmed arrests), a
power company who coincidentally has a top US official on the board of
directors win a multi million dollar contract with no competition to
do ALL the power restoration work in Iraq.

So America own the world with their porkies yet the most powerful
country in the world is incapable of influencing 8 or 10 people about
a war record which is controlled by the US government, influencing 1
man in charge of the IVAW (which they never actually deny this man was
a member), and drop 2 news articles to Americans media to bad name
this man then you have been eating too many pancakes and twinkies.

Wikipedia they also discuss the mans "criminal history", what has
that got to do with anything other than making the man seem
unreliable.

If you look at the media on my blog, you will notice many distressing
issues, you will actually see innocent people being shot and the
soldiers laughing on several occasions - it is not just this one video
by this one man.

The most well known behind the scenes investigation program
"Dispatches", from the UK does numerous documentaries on these issues,
as well as the most highly credible news reporters - are they also
telling porkies? I hardly think so.

There are numerous other people who talk about the terror that has
gone on in Iraq, including the use white phosphorous of which is then
verified by 2 ex soldiers (US) along with live media footage of the
drops, doctor examinations and leaked documents from the US and
UK but like I said, you are all entitled to your own opinions.

11/09/06, pauls (AT) utdallas (DOT) edu <pauls (AT) utdallas (DOT) eduwrote:

>September 11, 2006 8:20:51 PM +0100 c0ntex <c0ntexb (AT) gmail (DOT) com
>wrote:
>>
>You are entitled to your opinion.
>>
>Yeah, and it sucks this his is fact-based, doesn't it?
>>
>Paul Schmehl (pauls (AT) utdallas (DOT) edu)
>Adjunct Information Security
>The University of Texas at Dallas
>
>>
>>
>
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter:
>Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>>

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/