Windows

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California

    5 answers - 153 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    There is currently a call for paper ()
    for the 2006 Developer Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS
    and/or MidWare. Any killing idea ?
  • No.1 | | 388 bytes | |

    Francois PIETTE wrote:
    There is currently a call for paper
    () for the 2006 Developer
    Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare.
    Any killing idea ?

    I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-threaded
    server applications are better done with blocking sockets, time to
    clear them up.

    Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
  • No.2 | | 1314 bytes | |

    You can mention the 32-connections-per-thread async/MT mixed system that is
    only possible with non-blocking sockets such as ICS. I can send you C++ code
    snippets. And would appreciate if you mentioned IQRP as an example.

    Regards,

    SZ

    Message
    From: "Arno Garrels" <arno.garrels (AT) gmx (DOT) de>
    To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket (AT) elists (DOT) org>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 PM
    Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California

    : Francois PIETTE wrote:
    : There is currently a call for paper
    : () for the 2006 Developer
    : Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare.
    : Any killing idea ?
    :
    : I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-threaded
    : server applications are better done with blocking sockets, time to
    : clear them up.
    :
    :
    : Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
    :
    :
    :
    : >
    : --
    : francois.piette (AT) overbyte (DOT) be
    : The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
    : The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
    : http://www.overbyte.be
    : --
    : To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
    : please goto
    : Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
  • No.3 | | 1857 bytes | |

    Fastream Technologies wrote:
    You can mention the 32-connections-per-thread async/MT mixed system
    that is only possible with non-blocking sockets such as ICS. I can
    send you C++ code snippets. And would appreciate if you mentioned
    IQRP as an example.

    I recently started writing a MT TWSocket server component featuring
    a thread pool as well as a TWsocket pool inside a thread. It allows to
    set a fixed number of client threads and/or a fixed number of clients
    per thread. It's possible to grow either in the number of threads or
    the number of clients per thread, this should meet most requirements.

    Arno Garrels [TeamICS]

    Regards,

    SZ

    Message
    From: "Arno Garrels" <arno.garrels (AT) gmx (DOT) de>
    To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket (AT) elists (DOT) org>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 PM
    Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern
    California


    >Francois PIETTE wrote:

    There is currently a call for paper
    () for the 2006 Developer
    Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare.
    Any killing idea ?
    >
    >I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-
    >threaded server applications are better done with blocking sockets,
    >time to clear them up.
    >
    >
    >Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
    >
    >
    >


    --
    francois.piette (AT) overbyte (DOT) be
    The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
    The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
    http://www.overbyte.be
    >--
    >To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
    >please goto
    >Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
  • No.4 | | 2639 bytes | |

    Yes this approach is the best for FTP/SMTP/PP3 servers. We use a dynamic
    thread pool which remembers the number of threads served in the last second
    and scales the thread destruction/pooling with respect to that. This is even
    better than fixed number of threads.

    Regards,

    SZ

    Message
    From: "Arno Garrels" <arno.garrels (AT) gmx (DOT) de>
    To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket (AT) elists (DOT) org>
    Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:44 AM
    Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California

    : Fastream Technologies wrote:
    : You can mention the 32-connections-per-thread async/MT mixed system
    : that is only possible with non-blocking sockets such as ICS. I can
    : send you C++ code snippets. And would appreciate if you mentioned
    : IQRP as an example.
    :
    : I recently started writing a MT TWSocket server component featuring
    : a thread pool as well as a TWsocket pool inside a thread. It allows to
    : set a fixed number of client threads and/or a fixed number of clients
    : per thread. It's possible to grow either in the number of threads or
    : the number of clients per thread, this should meet most requirements.
    :
    :
    : Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
    :
    :
    :
    : >
    : Regards,
    : >
    : SZ
    : >
    : Message
    : From: "Arno Garrels" <arno.garrels (AT) gmx (DOT) de>
    : To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket (AT) elists (DOT) org>
    : Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 PM
    : Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern
    : California
    : >
    : >
    : >Francois PIETTE wrote:
    : There is currently a call for paper
    : () for the 2006 Developer
    : Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare.
    : Any killing idea ?
    : >>
    : >I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-
    : >threaded server applications are better done with blocking sockets,
    : >time to clear them up.
    : >>
    : >
    : >Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
    : >
    : >>
    : >>
    :
    : --
    : francois.piette (AT) overbyte (DOT) be
    : The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
    : The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
    : http://www.overbyte.be
    : >--
    : >To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
    : >please goto
    : >Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
    : --
    : To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
    : please goto
    : Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
  • No.5 | | 2799 bytes | |

    Fastream Technologies wrote:
    Yes this approach is the best for FTP/SMTP/PP3 servers. We use a
    dynamic thread pool which remembers the number of threads served in
    the last second and scales the thread destruction/pooling with
    respect to that. This is even better than fixed number of threads.

    course, my new MT server therefore has both a dynamic thread pool
    as well as a dynamic client pool per thread. Threads and clients
    can be preallocated.

    Regards,

    SZ

    Message
    From: "Arno Garrels" <arno.garrels (AT) gmx (DOT) de>
    To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket (AT) elists (DOT) org>
    Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:44 AM
    Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern
    California


    >Fastream Technologies wrote:

    You can mention the 32-connections-per-thread async/MT mixed system
    that is only possible with non-blocking sockets such as ICS. I can
    send you C++ code snippets. And would appreciate if you mentioned
    IQRP as an example.
    >
    >I recently started writing a MT TWSocket server component featuring
    >a thread pool as well as a TWsocket pool inside a thread. It allows
    >to set a fixed number of client threads and/or a fixed number of
    >clients per thread. It's possible to grow either in the number of
    >threads or the number of clients per thread, this should meet most
    >requirements.
    >
    >
    >Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
    >
    >
    >


    Regards,

    SZ

    Message
    From: "Arno Garrels" <arno.garrels (AT) gmx (DOT) de>
    To: "ICS support mailing" <twsocket (AT) elists (DOT) org>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 PM
    Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern
    California

    Francois PIETTE wrote:
    There is currently a call for paper
    () for the 2006 Developer
    Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare.
    Any killing idea ?

    I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-
    threaded server applications are better done with blocking sockets,
    time to clear them up.

    Arno Garrels [TeamICS]

    --
    francois.piette (AT) overbyte (DOT) be
    The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
    The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS)
    http://www.overbyte.be
    --
    To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
    please goto
    Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
    >--
    >To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
    >please goto
    >Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Re: 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 5 + 4 =
QUESTION ON "Windows"

EMSDN.COM