Security

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • all-in-one server

    5 answers - 277 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi,
    Is it safe to use one server as Router/firewall, file/backup server,
    torrent klient, ssh and maybe also as a webserver?
    Ubuntu is the S I would like to use.
    Thanks,
    ekrajb
    Epia M10000
    512 mb ram
    80 GB Seagate Barracuda
  • No.1 | | 2086 bytes | |

    ekrajb <no@email.xxxwrites:
    Hi,

    Is it safe to use one server as Router/firewall, file/backup server,
    torrent klient, ssh and maybe also as a webserver?

    Ubuntu is the S I would like to use.

    Architecturally speaking, it's generally discouraged to have any
    user-level usage of the border firewall, which mitigates against
    having the torrent client on there. File and backup serving is also
    relatively high risk because if someone pops any of the services
    you're discussing, they have instant access to all data for your
    organization.

    There are some worthy benefits to separating the firewall and routing
    functions onto a dedicated appliance at the very least. A general
    purpose computer running linux has some drawbacks as a firewall
    device. For one, it has a shell available to it, which makes
    vulnerabilities relatively easy to exploit if you were to fall lax in
    patching. A dumber device dedicated to border security does has some
    benefits, and allows you to be able to implement some more security in
    depth.

    But security questions are always about managing risks and balancing
    tradeoffs of cost, and those questions don't always have simple pat
    answers. And I'm afraid there really isn't such a thing as a "safe"
    internet connected system.

    However, I think it's safe to encourage you to consider a dedicated
    firewall appliance that is separate from at least the torrent client
    and the file/backup server, and to encourage you to do as much reading
    as possible about locking down linux based servers before you uncork
    this on the world. Include thoughts of file integrity checking
    software (tripwire), log management, and intrusion detection (such as
    snort) in your planning. Patch management is also important, and of
    course, if you're rolling custom software on the web site you plan to
    deploy, there are all sorts of ways web apps can be broken unless
    they're coded by someone rather security savvy.

    Best Regards,
  • No.2 | | 2373 bytes | |

    comphelp@toddh.net (Todd H.) wrote in news:84r72rupfn.fsf@ripco.com:

    ekrajb <no@email.xxxwrites:
    >Hi,
    >>

    >Is it safe to use one server as Router/firewall, file/backup server,
    >torrent klient, ssh and maybe also as a webserver?
    >>

    >Ubuntu is the S I would like to use.
    >

    Architecturally speaking, it's generally discouraged to have any
    user-level usage of the border firewall, which mitigates against
    having the torrent client on there. File and backup serving is also
    relatively high risk because if someone pops any of the services
    you're discussing, they have instant access to all data for your
    organization.

    There are some worthy benefits to separating the firewall and routing
    functions onto a dedicated appliance at the very least. A general
    purpose computer running linux has some drawbacks as a firewall
    device. For one, it has a shell available to it, which makes
    vulnerabilities relatively easy to exploit if you were to fall lax in
    patching. A dumber device dedicated to border security does has some
    benefits, and allows you to be able to implement some more security in
    depth.

    But security questions are always about managing risks and balancing
    tradeoffs of cost, and those questions don't always have simple pat
    answers. And I'm afraid there really isn't such a thing as a "safe"
    internet connected system.

    However, I think it's safe to encourage you to consider a dedicated
    firewall appliance that is separate from at least the torrent client
    and the file/backup server, and to encourage you to do as much reading
    as possible about locking down linux based servers before you uncork
    this on the world. Include thoughts of file integrity checking
    software (tripwire), log management, and intrusion detection (such as
    snort) in your planning. Patch management is also important, and of
    course, if you're rolling custom software on the web site you plan to
    deploy, there are all sorts of ways web apps can be broken unless
    they're coded by someone rather security savvy.

    Best Regards,

    I think I just keep my Linksys Router then.
    Thank you for the answer.
  • No.3 | | 1090 bytes | |

    ekrajb <no@email.xxxwrites:

    I think I just keep my Linksys Router then.
    Thank you for the answer.

    Do a few things to that though:
    a) make sure it's a newer one that has a stateful packet
    inspection (SPI) firewall. The older packet filtering
    firewalls are pretty easy to bypass.
    b) make sure the firmware is up to date. some linky's have
    exploits out for them that make them trivial to
    compromise. Attacker gets admin access, slides your
    servers into the DMZ of the router, and presto, you're no
    longer behind the firewall like you thin kyou are
    c) please tell me the administrator password has been set to
    something different than the default.
    d) you will want to send the logs somewhere to an inside box
    to tie into the intrusion detection system.

    If you're serious about security, you'll want a more featureful
    firewall than the standard $60 linky. And in order to get web
    services through the linky and such, makes sure your configurations
    are secure.

    Good luck!

    Best Regards,
  • No.4 | | 958 bytes | |

    Begin <84wtch5icp.fsf@ripco.com>
    2006-05-20, Todd H. <comphelp@toddh.netwrote:
    If you're serious about security, you'll want a more featureful
    firewall than the standard $60 linky.

    For that, `linux' can provide the tools to do it. can use a simple
    old desktop with two (or more) network cards. Another way is to get a
    small board that doesn't need much power and/or room like a linksys but
    that does allow you to install a better S on it. Some off-the-shelf
    routers allow you to put linux on them (a certain netgear model, I
    believe).

    Mini-ITX based machines are often used for this purpose as well. Also,
    soekris.com (various models) and pc engines (their WRAP board) make
    low-power boards that run a variety of free unices (*BSD, linux).

    I am not affiliated with either. See also: http://m0n0.ch/wall for a
    FreeBSD based project; their hardware links might be of interest.
  • No.5 | | 1159 bytes | |

    jpd <read_the_sig@do.not.spam.it.invalidwrites:

    Begin <84wtch5icp.fsf@ripco.com>
    2006-05-20, Todd H. <comphelp@toddh.netwrote:
    If you're serious about security, you'll want a more featureful
    firewall than the standard $60 linky.

    For that, `linux' can provide the tools to do it. can use a simple
    old desktop with two (or more) network cards. Another way is to get a
    small board that doesn't need much power and/or room like a linksys but
    that does allow you to install a better S on it. Some off-the-shelf
    routers allow you to put linux on them (a certain netgear model, I
    believe).

    Linksys wrt54g is among them. There's a good deal of 3rd party
    open source firmware for them.

    Mini-ITX based machines are often used for this purpose as well. Also,
    soekris.com (various models) and pc engines (their WRAP board) make
    low-power boards that run a variety of free unices (*BSD, linux).

    Soekris.com boxes are kewl.

    I am not affiliated with either. See also: http://m0n0.ch/wall for a
    FreeBSD based project; their hardware links might be of interest.

Re: all-in-one server


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 2 + 1 =
QUESTION ON "Security"

EMSDN.COM