Python

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • pyGtk compared to wxPython

    2 answers - 1101 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hello,
    I'm just curious about whether someone
    worked already with pygtk and can
    tell us the opinion about it and
    in comparision with wxPython.
    I don't want to entice the people here of course! :)
    But looking at the well written tutorial, which
    explains every widget and has a methodical order,
    it is a complete book.
    (pygtk2-tut.pdf)
    Also the sum of widgets is impressive
    and for example the approach of the tree view
    widget together with the treem model is interesting.
    I came to this, because I tried to start convert
    a pygtk app (XPN) to wxPython; at least parts of the application.
    Although XPN is well written, the reimplemenation of it in
    wxPython is is a tough task.
    I want to do it in first line to learn more about
    wxPython.
    There are also some controls, where I cannot find any
    counterpart as the gtk.Expander (it is like a small treecontrol).
    Maybe a toggle button could be used here.
    Also the text view widgets looks very efficient.
    But here we have the styled text control.
  • No.1 | | 1637 bytes | |

    Hello,

    I think that PyGTK is much more easier to use, has more clean API,
    more widgets and better documentation than wxPython.

    But it has a serious drawback as its look and feel is alien on win32
    (and probably MS) platform. Even with the XP theme. That's why I
    think that it is better to use wxPython for cross-platfrom
    applications.

    If the application is Unix-specific, I'd prefer PyGTK.
    Eugene

    10/4/06, Franz Steinhaeusler <franz.steinhaeusler (AT) gmx (DOT) atwrote:
    Hello,

    I'm just curious about whether someone
    worked already with pygtk and can
    tell us the opinion about it and
    in comparision with wxPython.

    I don't want to entice the people here of course! :)

    But looking at the well written tutorial, which
    explains every widget and has a methodical order,
    it is a complete book.

    (pygtk2-tut.pdf)

    Also the sum of widgets is impressive
    and for example the approach of the tree view
    widget together with the treem model is interesting.

    I came to this, because I tried to start convert
    a pygtk app (XPN) to wxPython; at least parts of the application.

    Although XPN is well written, the reimplemenation of it in
    wxPython is is a tough task.
    I want to do it in first line to learn more about
    wxPython.

    There are also some controls, where I cannot find any
    counterpart as the gtk.Expander (it is like a small treecontrol).
    Maybe a toggle button could be used here.

    Also the text view widgets looks very efficient.
    But here we have the styled text control.
    --
  • No.2 | | 985 bytes | |

    Eugene Morozov wrote:

    Hello,

    Hi Eugene,

    I think that PyGTK is much more easier to use, has more clean API,
    more widgets and better documentation than wxPython.

    I feel or fear, you don't tell me a lie! :)
    But with more widgets, I don't agree; maybe you are right
    that they are more in the core distribution and commented well-

    But it has a serious drawback as its look and feel is alien on win32
    (and probably MS) platform.

    Yes, I hate this gtk look on windows. ;)

    Even with the XP theme. That's why I
    think that it is better to use wxPython for cross-platfrom
    applications.

    Yes, this is also my opinion.

    By no means, I wanted to question this, I only wanted to know
    (and thank you) for your opinion.

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: wxPython-users-unsubscribe (AT) lists (DOT) wxwidgets.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: wxPython-users-help (AT) lists (DOT) wxwidgets.org

Re: pyGtk compared to wxPython


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 5 + 4 =
QUESTION ON "Python"

EMSDN.COM