I report back in some embarrassment. Fderoa Core 2 is now installed
on my system. It turns out that there was no problem with either
fedora or the Linux kernel. It was entirely my fault for not paying
attention. That, and a rather wierd disk partition setup that Compaq
uses.
It turns out that in Windows I have a C:\ drive that contains windows
and all my user files, and a D:\ drive that contains special Windows
backup files. In other words, if you boot to the D:\ drive, yopu get
the special CMPAQ system restore.
the other hand, in linux, for some reason the D:\ drive is the one
reported as "hda1," and the C:\ drive is "hda2." So when I set GRUB
up to boot to windows, I should have set it to boot to hda2.
course, when I had the opportunity during GRUB setup, the program
defaulted to hda1 as the alternative boot. So basically, any time I
would instruct GRUB to boot me to Windows, it booted up a system
restore.
I ended up having to wipe my Fedora install and reinstall it. That
meant that I zapped the linux partitions using Windows diskmanager,
and then simply re-installed it. I'm not sure how I realized that the
partition naming was a problem, but I should have realized it when
running disk druid, and I could see that the hda1 partition only had
~5 GB and the hda2 partition had ~79 GB. Just like Windows Disk
manager says that D:\ had ~5 GB and C:\ has ~79 GB.
Anyway, Fedora Core 2 is now up and running on my machine, which is
good becuase I did something in windows that rotated the image in my
monitor, so until I can figure out how to turn it around, I'll have to
stick with using linux. Actually, it was pretty impressive. Excpet
for my stupid mistake setting up GRUB, the install was totally
uneventful. Not bad for a non-geek who not only installed linux, but
did so from downloaded iso disks. Maybe linux is ready for the common
desktop.
Joe
efflandt@xnet.com (David Efflandt) wrote in message news:<slrnce98ib.13l.efflandt@typhoon.xnet.com>
22 Jun 2004 05:57:22 -0700, Joe Bachman <joseph_bachman@yahoo.comwrote:
"Quaoar" <quaoar@tenthplanet.netwrote in message
news:<de6dnWFcGuTP70vd4p2dnA@comcast.com>
Concerning my Fedora dual-boot problems with Windows XP:
>
>Joe Bachman wrote:
>Too late, I realized that I should have set a "restore point" before I
>attempted to install a Fedora Linux as a dual boot with Windows XP on
>my Compaq Presario desktop. I did back up all my data files, for
>whatever good that did.
>>
>What happened?!!? What triggered Windows into performing this
>unneeded system restore, and how can I prevent it from doing so in the
>future?
>>
>Is it possible for me to boot up Linux without having to reinstall it?
>>
>What's the best way for me to get my Windows applications running
>normally again, as well as getting "my Documents" into its proper
>folder?
>>
>This hasn't been totally bad, as Windows seems to run faster now that
>a lot of my junk loaded in at startup and registry clutter is gone.
>But I do want to get Norton antivirus and my firewall up and running.
>>
>>
>AFIK, Fedora Core, in the initial public release, did exactly this on a
>dual boot install. This *feature* was apparently fixed in a subsequent
>re-release. Google Groups: fedora core for some info on this.
>>
>Q
>
>
Ah yes, my googling found quite a bit of net.taffic on this topic.
What seems to happen most frequently is that Windows XP just hangs
when one attempts to boot with GRUB, the bootloader supplied with
Fedora. If one reinstalls Windows, then GRUB is eliminated, and one
can't access Fedora without using a boot floppy or CD.
I suspect that CMPAQ's installation of XP has a command to do a
system restore if XP hangs when booted. Is there some way I can view
what commands the computer runds when Windows is booted up?
The real problem, however, lies not in Windows, but apparently in the
Linux 2.6 kernel. Installation alters the partition "geometry," in
some way. Apparently this can be fixed fairly easily. Then one needs
to re-load GRUB so one can dual boot without having to boot from a
floppy or CD.
I don't think it is the kernel, it was likely a fault with whatever Fedora
uses to partition (do they still use Disk Druid?). SuSE 9.1 tried to do
the same thing to me (wanted to change heads from 240 to 255 and different
cylinders), but I caught it, because I had just fixed my partition table
after 64-bit Win XP Pro had done that to me. I was lucky and managed to
recreate my partition table from a Mdk 9.2 based rescue CD with no data
loss.
So I told SuSE's partitioner to leave my partitions alone and installed
GRUB on a partition instead of MBR. With GRUB on the active boot
partition, it comes up first, which can either boot 64-bit Linux, or hand
it off to NTLDR for XP Home or 64-bit XP Pro.