Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.comwrote in
news:m33bf72kf9.fsf@lhwlinux.garlic.com:
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.comwrites:
>i regularly access some number of https sites with self-signed
>certificates where my browser initially complains it is signed by
>an unknown certification authority (itself) and gives me an
>opportunity to view it, accept it for the current session, and/or load
>it for long term acceptance (basically into the same repository that
>contains the certification authority self-signed digital certificates
>that were loaded as part of building the browsers).
>
the real major difference between a self-signed digital certificate
that you generate and a self-signed digital certificate generated
by some certification authority it that the certificate
authorities have convinced the browser vendors (typically by paying
them) to preload their digital certificates into the browser's digital
certificate repository when the browser is built.
however, it is straight-forward operation for clients to do
post-install administrative operations on their browser's digital
certificate repository (adding and/or deleting digital certificates).
Actually one of the best phishing (and related) attacks (where you have
access to another's machines) is to diddle the certificate repository.
Very few ever consider this security risk.
Regards,