Networking

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • lint only one rule file

    14 answers - 334 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
    Hash: SHA1
    I whould like to lint a singular rule file
    e.g. spamassassin /
    but this is not working and I cannot find the right syntax in the
    howtos. How to proced?
    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
    wFpF6ByBrZ01bPtSFN8mI8E=
    =x3HM
    PGP SIGNATURE
  • No.1 | | 568 bytes | |

    Christian Eichert wrote:
    PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
    Hash: SHA1

    I whould like to lint a singular rule file

    e.g. spamassassin /

    but this is not working and I cannot find the right syntax in the
    howtos. How to proced?
    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

    wFpF6ByBrZ01bPtSFN8mI8E=
    =x3HM
    PGP SIGNATURE

    What I usually do is copy the rulename.cf to /etc/mail/spamassassin then
    run spamassassin

    Unless or until you reload SA it won't pick up the new rulename.cf

    course YMMV,
    -Doc
  • No.2 | | 1147 bytes | |

    At 02:04 AM 12/3/2005, Christian Eichert wrote:
    PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
    >Hash: SHA1
    >
    >I whould like to lint a singular rule file
    >
    >e.g. spamassassin /
    >
    >but this is not working and I cannot find the right syntax in the
    >howtos. How to proced?


    You'll need to force SA to examine empty dirs for the default config and
    site config paths, then tell it a single file.

    In this example, I'll use /var/empty/ for an empty directory, change to site.

    spamassassin /var/emtpy /var/empty
    /

    However, your example does concern me you didn't edit 10_misc.cf, did you?

    Don't edit anything in /usr/share/spamassassin unless you really understand
    all the implications of this. For starters this whole directory will be
    obliterated and re-written when you upgrade SA. All edits you make here
    will be lost on upgrade. This directory is intended to only contain SA's
    "default" setup.

    Make all your site-specific options in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, or
    some other *.cf in that directory.
  • No.3 | | 852 bytes | |

    Matt Kettler wrote:
    []
    However, your example does concern me you didn't edit 10_misc.cf, did
    you?

    Don't edit anything in /usr/share/spamassassin unless you really
    understand all the implications of this. For starters this whole
    directory will be obliterated and re-written when you upgrade SA. All
    edits you make here will be lost on upgrade. This directory is intended
    to only contain SA's "default" setup.

    Make all your site-specific options in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf,
    or some other *.cf in that directory.

    sooory mat

    it was jut a exemple

    i downloaded some thired party cf files and noticd that there where
    errors and tried to tix them

    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

    /y53k8DM0yMzaba8EmDb2dY=
    =DQHQ
    PGP SIGNATURE
  • No.4 | | 618 bytes | |

    From: "Christian Eichert" <moga (AT) mx (DOT) homelinux.org>

    Lots of warning messages and text deleted

    Christian, go back to the way you had it and ignore the error messages.
    All the refer to is the "pretty formatting" for the spam reports in an
    effort to keep them from running over 80 columns.

    Since I don't worry about "pretty" I cheated. I went into the perl
    files and found the error messages. I changed the criteria for the
    error messages by doubling the number. Poof, no more messages. I am
    a naughty naughty girl and I'm proud of it.

    {^_-}
  • No.5 | | 1118 bytes | |

    I have a wonderfull message for all of you

    I wrote a script.

    :-)

    It's here

    WHAT DES IT D?
    It brings you some rulz. Chechs them, and put them in the ruls folder.
    It doesn't touch the official rules, just completes them.

    HW DES IT WRK
    First it creats a folder called "other"
    Then it downloads some rules from some locations.

    After this it checks them one by one with
    If the syntax is K it copies them paste to the rules folder.

    HW T USE?
    copy the script in your /etc/cron.daily

    optionaly _IF_YU_TRUST_ME_ you may put a crontab to download
    it from time to time from the upper location someting like

    * * * * * wget wget -q ""
    "/etc/cron.daily/sa-fetchrules"
    - - - - -
    | | | | |
    | | | | + day of week (0 - 6) (Sunday=0)
    | | | + month (1 - 12)
    | | + day of month (1 - 31)
    | + hour (0 - 23)
    + min (0 - 59)

    WHY to put in crontab?
    because I will work on it and so you have allways the newest File
    with the newest rulz.

    It' GNU/GPL so you can all use it Falks.

    someone kiss me !
  • No.6 | | 896 bytes | |

    At 05:47 AM 12/3/2005, Christian Eichert wrote:

    >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    >

    PGP Signature Status: unknown key
    Signer: unknown, Key ID = C684FEE4D2D11696

    BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE
    all the story
    >
    >I got spamassassin from the ubuntu breeze with the apt and noticed
    >that doing a
    >
    >spamassassin
    >
    >I get a whole bunch of warnings
    >from:
    >
    >
    >warning: description for HTML_SHUTING4 is over 50 chars
    >warning: description for CLICK_TREMVE_1 is over 50 chars
    >warning: description for RCVD_IN_SRBS_SMTP is over 50 chars


    Very typical of SA 3.0.x when using a non-english report setting. This is
    harmless, but fixed in SA 3.1.0 by releaxing the warning limit.
  • No.7 | | 508 bytes | |

    At 09:12 AM 12/3/2005, Christian Eichert wrote:

    >I have a wonderfull message for all of you
    >
    >I wrote a script.


    >:-)
    >
    >It's here
    >
    >
    >WHAT DES IT D?
    >It brings you some rulz. Chechs them, and put them in the ruls folder.
    >It doesn't touch the official rules, just completes them.


    So how is this different from the RulesDuJour script that everyone uses?
  • No.8 | | 833 bytes | |

    Matt Kettler wrote:
    At 09:12 AM 12/3/2005, Christian Eichert wrote:

    >I have a wonderfull message for all of you
    >>

    >I wrote a script.
    >
    >:-)
    >>

    >It's here
    >
    >>

    >WHAT DES IT D?
    >It brings you some rulz. Chechs them, and put them in the ruls folder.
    >It doesn't touch the official rules, just completes them.


    So how is this different from the RulesDuJour script that everyone uses?
    It's not anything near as complete. The default location for the custom
    rules does not look suitable to me and there is no linting of the rules
    after an update, which seems to defeat the object of the exercise in my
    opinion.
  • No.9 | | 626 bytes | |

    >
    >It's here
    >
    >
    >WHAT DES IT D?
    >It brings you some rulz. Chechs them, and put them in the ruls folder.
    >It doesn't touch the official rules, just completes them.


    other thing Christian.

    Please remove my antidrug.cf from your script. This file should NT be used
    by anyone with SA version 3.0.0 or higher as they are already included.

    Please see my post "Antidrug.cf deprecated and no longer maintained." From
    November 29.

    I intend to remove this file and rename in antidrug-pre30.cf in the near
    future.
  • No.10 | | 535 bytes | |

    Matt Kettler wrote:
    At 09:12 AM 12/3/2005, Christian Eichert wrote:

    So how is this different from the RulesDuJour script that everyone uses?

    it's yet another script

    this the princip of linux
    many different applications

    not only one we talk about later

    and it will be schorter cooler and use less memory
    sa uses a lot of RAM
    I will measure it and tell you

    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

    lc/8NC0+iCJdczbHmlRxUmY=
    =gqb0
    PGP SIGNATURE
  • No.11 | | 1095 bytes | |

    Michele Neylon:: Blacknight.ie wrote:
    Matt Kettler wrote:

    >>At 09:12 AM 12/3/2005, Christian Eichert wrote:
    >>
    >>

    I have a wonderfull message for all of you

    I wrote a script.

    :-)

    It's here

    WHAT DES IT D?
    It brings you some rulz. Chechs them, and put them in the ruls folder.
    It doesn't touch the official rules, just completes them.
    >>
    >>
    >>So how is this different from the RulesDuJour script that everyone uses?


    It's not anything near as complete. The default location for the custom
    rules does not look suitable to me and there is no linting of the rules
    after an update, which seems to defeat the object of the exercise in my
    opinion.

    of corse it's scrap yeaks throw it away

    for me it works better i have less spam

    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

    NHDl46BjR8QLUH06o=
    =Ft5I
    PGP SIGNATURE
  • No.12 | | 831 bytes | |

    Matt Kettler wrote:

    other thing Christian.

    Please remove my antidrug.cf from your script. This file should NT be
    used by anyone with SA version 3.0.0 or higher as they are already
    included.

    Please see my post "Antidrug.cf deprecated and no longer maintained."
    From November 29.

    I intend to remove this file and rename in antidrug-pre30.cf in the near
    future.

    thanks

    I see no problem because if it is not lint-ing
    it is not added to the other rules

    but I removed it

    thanks again

    why dont' you put the replay to the list
    I get every mail double

    BTW mailman can set this up to not sent mail double

    regards

    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

    siNwsWmI8WoXQGZ57Yb4gew=
    =L+CH
    PGP SIGNATURE
  • No.13 | | 234 bytes | |

    Are you mad? Nobody asked you to send 1800 lines of text to everyone on
    the list. Please stop abusing the list in this way!
    I have a "wonderful message" to you: stay away from my inbox if you can't
    behave!
    Kai
  • No.14 | | 368 bytes | |

    Please remove my antidrug.cf from your script. This file should NT be
    used by anyone with SA version 3.0.0 or higher as they are already
    included.

    Please see my post "Antidrug.cf deprecated and no longer maintained."
    From November 29.

    Eek! I didn't see that message. Glad I saw *this* one, and removed the
    antidrug.cf file. :)

Re: lint only one rule file


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 3 + 3 =
QUESTION ON "Networking"

EMSDN.COM