KDE

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Smudge paintop

    27 answers - 259 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Yay! Cyrille has added a cool smudge paintop to Krita 1.6. course, that
    also means we'll need a new icon for in the paintop combobox Something
    with a smudging finger or so. Anyway, Ronan, could you whip out your tools
    and come up with something?
  • No.1 | | 711 bytes | |

    Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Monday 04 December 2006 14:34, Ronan Zeegers wrote:

    >Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    >

    Yay! Cyrille has added a cool smudge paintop to Krita 1.6. course,
    that also means we'll need a new icon for in the paintop combobox
    Something with a smudging finger or so. Anyway, Ronan, could you whip out
    your tools and come up with something?

    >With pleasuuuuuuuure! ;)
    >So what? I do the sponge thing?
    >
    >

    Should be nice!

    In this case, I can recycle one of my sponge icon:

    What do you think?

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.2 | | 37 bytes | |

    What do you think?
    I vote for b :)
  • No.3 | | 227 bytes | |

    Cyrille Berger wrote:
    >What do you think?
    >

    I vote for b :)
    Do you have the same in your kitchen? :D
    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.4 | | 109 bytes | |

    Tuesday 05 December 2006 18:13, Cyrille Berger wrote:
    What do you think?
    I vote for b :)
    me too
  • No.5 | | 1684 bytes | |

    Hi guys (and girls?),

    I just tried the new Krita and it is still very buggy

    But first the good news; I tried the Transform Tool with my wacom and it
    works well now! Great job!

    And now the bad ones; when I use the transform tool with a selection, I
    end up with a very nasty bug. I already found a bug report

    I dont want to be hard or discouraging but that kind of bugs should be
    only in beta release not in 1.6.1

    I also have to say that I find the selection system not very convenient.
    When I work with a selection, I want to have a clear view of my image in
    the same time. I mean the whole image.
    The semi transparent mauve color really doesn't help here. It's a cool
    thing to have when I work on my selection area but not when I work with
    my selection (i.e. when using the transform tool or brush).
    The user should be able to switch between dotted lines (I don't think
    anyone has found a better system right now) and the semi mauve
    transparent color (maybe without the buggy red line).

    This is exaclty the same system as photoshop but I can't think myself of
    a better way.

    I also didn't find an easy way to deselect. a complex shortcut
    combo or going through the menu. An easier shortcut and a deselect tool,
    even if it seems stupid, can be a good stuff to have in terms of
    usability and work speed.

    Krita has a really great design and I think it's a sexy project. I
    really would like to use it daily but all those bugs on basic tools
    prevent me to do so

    Ronan

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.6 | | 2494 bytes | |

    Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:06, Ronan Zeegers wrote:
    Hi guys (and girls?),

    I just tried the new Krita and it is still very buggy
    --
    But first the good news; I tried the Transform Tool with my wacom and it
    works well now! Great job!

    And now the bad ones; when I use the transform tool with a selection, I
    end up with a very nasty bug. I already found a bug report

    I dont want to be hard or discouraging but that kind of bugs should be
    only in beta release not in 1.6.1

    Yeah, I discovered that today. I'm not sure whether it has been there all
    along or is a regression. That's one thing we really and truly lack:
    regression tests. Testing all (and I mean _all_ features before a release.
    But I see from the bug reports that Casper knows what's wrong already, maybe
    he can fix it for 1.6.2

    I also have to say that I find the selection system not very convenient.
    When I work with a selection, I want to have a clear view of my image in
    the same time. I mean the whole image.
    The semi transparent mauve color really doesn't help here. It's a cool
    thing to have when I work on my selection area but not when I work with
    my selection (i.e. when using the transform tool or brush).
    The user should be able to switch between dotted lines (I don't think
    anyone has found a better system right now) and the semi mauve
    transparent color (maybe without the buggy red line).

    Yes I think we'll have to bite the bullet and come up with a marching ants
    system, too. Even though Qt4 has made that a lot more difficult for us :-(

    I also didn't find an easy way to deselect. a complex shortcut
    combo or going through the menu. An easier shortcut and a deselect tool,
    even if it seems stupid, can be a good stuff to have in terms of
    usability and work speed.

    That's a bit of a problem: ctrl-shift-a is a kde standard shortcut for
    deselect. It's even wider: gimp has the same shortcut. I cannot right now
    test Photoshop or Corel Painter. What do other graphics apps do to make it
    easier to deselect?

    Krita has a really great design and I think it's a sexy project. I
    really would like to use it daily but all those bugs on basic tools
    prevent me to do so.

    If you have the energy, don't hesitate to tell us about each and every bug --
    the mailing list is okay for that, no need to fight with bugzilla!
  • No.7 | | 3134 bytes | |

    >I also have to say that I find the selection system not very convenient.
    >When I work with a selection, I want to have a clear view of my image in
    >the same time. I mean the whole image.
    >The semi transparent mauve color really doesn't help here. It's a cool
    >thing to have when I work on my selection area but not when I work with
    >my selection (i.e. when using the transform tool or brush).
    >The user should be able to switch between dotted lines (I don't think
    >anyone has found a better system right now) and the semi mauve
    >transparent color (maybe without the buggy red line).
    >
    >

    Yes I think we'll have to bite the bullet and come up with a marching ants
    system, too. Even though Qt4 has made that a lot more difficult for us :-(

    The new Qt Arthur thing do not help here?


    >I also didn't find an easy way to deselect. a complex shortcut
    >combo or going through the menu. An easier shortcut and a deselect tool,
    >even if it seems stupid, can be a good stuff to have in terms of
    >usability and work speed.
    >
    >

    That's a bit of a problem: ctrl-shift-a is a kde standard shortcut for
    deselect. It's even wider: gimp has the same shortcut. I cannot right now
    test Photoshop or Corel Painter. What do other graphics apps do to make it
    easier to deselect?

    I think it's Ctrl+D in photoshop or click (without drag) with a
    selection tool on an area outside of the selection. But this last
    behaviour is not really the way to go.
    A second shortcut (with only 2 buttons) and/or a new bouton/tool to
    unselect in the toolbox are the best ideas I have for now.


    >Krita has a really great design and I think it's a sexy project. I
    >really would like to use it daily but all those bugs on basic tools
    >prevent me to do so.
    >
    >

    If you have the energy, don't hesitate to tell us about each and every bug --
    the mailing list is okay for that, no need to fight with bugzilla!

    ! It's true that bugzilla is not that fastest tool to use. But some
    bugs of usability improvement on the mailing list where not take in
    consideration.
    ie a mail write the 20 sept 2006:

    >I've been thinking with a friend of mine (http://www.design-hero.com/)
    >about the current arrangement of the icons. And I think it could be
    >improved.
    >
    >Here is my rearrangement proposal of the icons:
    >
    >
    >I have also removed the separator at the bottom of the Toolbar. Usually
    >a separator separate from something.
    >
    >btw, there is a little bug with the vertical size of the magnifying
    >glass icon:
    >
    >
    >Ronan.


    A wiki with all the bugs and behaviour problems can maybe do the job.
    I'm not sure what's the best solution.

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.8 | | 623 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 07:36, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    I also didn't find an easy way to deselect. a complex shortcut
    combo or going through the menu. An easier shortcut and a deselect tool,
    even if it seems stupid, can be a good stuff to have in terms of
    usability and work speed.

    That's a bit of a problem: ctrl-shift-a is a kde standard shortcut for
    deselect. It's even wider: gimp has the same shortcut. I cannot right now
    test Photoshop or Corel Painter. What do other graphics apps do to make it
    easier to deselect?

    Paint (MS or Kolour-): Esc or clicking elsewhere
  • No.9 | | 797 bytes | |

    Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Clarence Dang wrote:

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 07:36, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    I also didn't find an easy way to deselect. a complex shortcut
    combo or going through the menu. An easier shortcut and a deselect tool,
    even if it seems stupid, can be a good stuff to have in terms of
    usability and work speed.

    That's a bit of a problem: ctrl-shift-a is a kde standard shortcut for
    deselect. It's even wider: gimp has the same shortcut. I cannot right now
    test Photoshop or Corel Painter. What do other graphics apps do to make it
    easier to deselect?

    Paint (MS or Kolour-): Esc or clicking elsewhere

    Esc is a good idea.

    Boudewijn Rempt

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.10 | | 377 bytes | |

    it's here:

    I will try to keep it up to date and make an announcement every times
    I'm putting something new on it. It's faster than bugzilla. I'll will go
    back to bugzilla when Krita will be a bit more "bug free".

    First thing:
    problems when all is selected

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.11 | | 407 bytes | |

    Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:38, Ronan Zeegers wrote:
    it's here:

    I will try to keep it up to date and make an announcement every times
    I'm putting something new on it. It's faster than bugzilla. I'll will go
    back to bugzilla when Krita will be a bit more "bug free".

    Maybe we should paint a blue border around the whole image canvas when
    everything is selected?
  • No.12 | | 1851 bytes | |

    Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:12, Ronan Zeegers wrote:

    The new Qt Arthur thing do not help here?

    the contrary: that is making marching ants a lot more difficult because it
    removed the XR paint operator.

    I think it's Ctrl+D in photoshop or click (without drag) with a
    selection tool on an area outside of the selection. But this last
    behaviour is not really the way to go.
    A second shortcut (with only 2 buttons) and/or a new bouton/tool to
    unselect in the toolbox are the best ideas I have for now.

    Would Clarence's suggestion of using the escape key fit the bill? Not sure
    whether this is actually feasible, since deselect is kde-wide standard
    action. If you go to Keyboard Shortcuts in kcontrol, choose the Application
    Shortcuts tab, you can add Escape as an alternae shortcut (or ctrl-D).

    ! It's true that bugzilla is not that fastest tool to use. But some
    bugs of usability improvement on the mailing list where not taken in
    consideration.

    ie a mail write the 20 sept 2006:
    >I've been thinking with a friend of mine (http://www.design-hero.com/)
    >about the current arrangement of the icons. And I think it could be
    >improved.
    >
    >Here is my rearrangement proposal of the icons:
    >
    >
    >I have also removed the separator at the bottom of the Toolbar. Usually
    >a separator separate from something.
    >
    >btw, there is a little bug with the vertical size of the magnifying
    >glass icon:
    >
    >
    >Ronan.


    Moet ik naar kijken, maar ik ben nu op m'n werk.

    A wiki with all the bugs and behaviour problems can maybe do the job.
    I'm not sure what's the best solution.

    A wiki page on wiki.koffice.org is easy enough to add.
  • No.13 | | 279 bytes | |

    The new Qt Arthur thing do not help here?
    the contrary: that is making marching ants a lot more difficult because
    it removed the XR paint operator.
    I don't know where you got that idea, but from
    #CompositionMode-enum I still see
    the XR composite mode.
  • No.14 | | 667 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 11:13, Cyrille Berger wrote:
    The new Qt Arthur thing do not help here?

    the contrary: that is making marching ants a lot more difficult
    because it removed the XR paint operator.

    I don't know where you got that idea, but from
    #CompositionMode-enum I still see
    the XR composite mode.

    Which says:

    The source, which alpha is reduced with the inverse of the destination alpha,
    is merged with the destination, which alpha is reduced by the inverse of the
    source alpha. CompositionMode_Xor is not the same as the bitwise Xor.

    And I have always understood that bitwise xor is what we needed
  • No.15 | | 1358 bytes | |

    Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:12, Ronan Zeegers wrote:

    ! It's true that bugzilla is not that fastest tool to use. But some
    bugs of usability improvement on the mailing list where not take in
    consideration.

    Yes. Things may fall through the cracks. That doesn't mean suggestions aren't
    appreciated -- just that we're human.

    ie a mail write the 20 sept 2006:
    >I've been thinking with a friend of mine (http://www.design-hero.com/)
    >about the current arrangement of the icons. And I think it could be
    >improved.
    >
    >Here is my rearrangement proposal of the icons:
    >


    Not sure why that wasn't done -- at that time I wasn't working on 1.6 myself,
    so that's something to ask Cyrille. I think it can be done in 1.6, because
    there is provision to order tools by priority per group, but I'm not sure how
    well it works.

    >I have also removed the separator at the bottom of the Toolbar. Usually
    >a separator separate from something.


    Fixed!

    >btw, there is a little bug with the vertical size of the magnifying
    >glass icon:
    >


    Er Didn't you paint the icons? :-) I'll commit a fixed one as soon as I
    have it.
  • No.16 | | 446 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:18, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:

    Not sure why that wasn't done -- at that time I wasn't working on 1.6
    myself, so that's something to ask Cyrille. I think it can be done in 1.6,
    because there is provision to order tools by priority per group, but I'm
    not sure how well it works.

    Ah, I see: most of it _is_ done. The selection tools for instance. I'll see
    about the rest.
  • No.17 | | 487 bytes | |

    Which says:

    The source, which alpha is reduced with the inverse of the destination
    alpha, is merged with the destination, which alpha is reduced by the
    inverse of the source alpha. CompositionMode_Xor is not the same as the
    bitwise Xor.

    And I have always understood that bitwise xor is what we needed
    oh right, on the other, the gimp marching ants doesn't use xor. I can't test
    on photoshop right now but I don't remember it to use xor either.
  • No.18 | | 569 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:28, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:18, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Not sure why that wasn't done -- at that time I wasn't working on 1.6
    myself, so that's something to ask Cyrille. I think it can be done in
    1.6, because there is provision to order tools by priority per group, but
    I'm not sure how well it works.

    Ah, I see: most of it _is_ done. The selection tools for instance. I'll see
    about the rest.
    well we didn't because we discussed it and decided not to.
  • No.19 | | 1564 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:18, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    ie a mail write the 20 sept 2006:
    >I've been thinking with a friend of mine (http://www.design-hero.com/)
    >about the current arrangement of the icons. And I think it could be
    >improved.
    >
    >Here is my rearrangement proposal of the icons:
    >
    >

    Not sure why that wasn't done -- at that time I wasn't working on 1.6
    myself, so that's something to ask Cyrille. I think it can be done in 1.6,
    because there is provision to order tools by priority per group, but I'm
    not sure how well it works.

    if I remember correctly, the tool order were changed, but from the discution
    there were some disagreement with ronan's suggestion, and an other grouping
    was choosen.

    From my memory:
    For instnace the crop tool was put in the layer/manipulation category because
    the pan, zoom and grids tools doesn't affect the image but the canvas. While
    crop is a tool that have a direct effect on the layer, not to mention that
    crop can be applied to tool.

    As for drawing tools, it's very questionnable if the polygon tool and the
    polyline tool should be seperated or not. I mean they are very similar. I
    honestly don't know. If someone has any opinion on this ?

    The question I am asking myself is why the the fill, gradient, text and picker
    tool aren't above the layer/manipulation ones, I think to remember that it
    was done other wise before.
  • No.20 | | 432 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:40, Cyrille Berger wrote:

    oh right, on the other, the gimp marching ants doesn't use xor. I can't
    test on photoshop right now but I don't remember it to use xor either.

    Ah, I thought it did -- just like our brush outline uses xor. I must have been
    confused then. Unfortunately, I still have no clue how to code marching ants.
    But it's necessary to have both.
  • No.21 | | 679 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:44, Casper Boemann wrote:
    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:28, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:18, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Not sure why that wasn't done -- at that time I wasn't working on 1.6
    myself, so that's something to ask Cyrille. I think it can be done in
    1.6, because there is provision to order tools by priority per group,
    but I'm not sure how well it works.

    Ah, I see: most of it _is_ done. The selection tools for instance. I'll
    see about the rest.

    well we didn't because we discussed it and decided not to.

    Ah, I didn't remember that either.
  • No.22 | | 751 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:49, Cyrille Berger wrote:
    As for drawing tools, it's very questionnable if the polygon tool and the
    polyline tool should be seperated or not. I mean they are very similar. I
    honestly don't know. If someone has any opinion on this ?

    thing that I would like a lot is the freehand and the curve tool in the
    top two positions. Polgyon and polyline are different tools because it's
    otherwise very confusing to discover how to end a shape with or without
    closing it.

    The question I am asking myself is why the the fill, gradient, text and
    picker tool aren't above the layer/manipulation ones, I think to remember
    that it was done other wise before.

    Good point.
  • No.23 | | 785 bytes | |

    Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:38, Ronan Zeegers wrote:

    >it's here:
    >
    >>

    >I will try to keep it up to date and make an announcement every times
    >I'm putting something new on it. It's faster than bugzilla. I'll will go
    >back to bugzilla when Krita will be a bit more "bug free".
    >
    >

    Maybe we should paint a blue border around the whole image canvas when
    everything is selected?

    For now, I think it's the best idea. Maybe with the same red as the
    selection. But for the futur, the marching ants like in the gimp is a
    better solution.

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.24 | | 1717 bytes | |

    >I think it's Ctrl+D in photoshop or click (without drag) with a
    >selection tool on an area outside of the selection. But this last
    >behaviour is not really the way to go.
    >A second shortcut (with only 2 buttons) and/or a new bouton/tool to
    >unselect in the toolbox are the best ideas I have for now.
    >
    >

    Would Clarence's suggestion of using the escape key fit the bill? Not sure
    whether this is actually feasible, since deselect is kde-wide standard
    action. If you go to Keyboard Shortcuts in kcontrol, choose the Application
    Shortcuts tab, you can add Escape as an alternae shortcut (or ctrl-D).

    Esc is a cool solution.

    >! It's true that bugzilla is not that fastest tool to use. But some
    >bugs of usability improvement on the mailing list where not taken in
    >consideration.
    >>

    >ie a mail write the 20 sept 2006:
    >

    I've been thinking with a friend of mine (http://www.design-hero.com/)
    about the current arrangement of the icons. And I think it could be
    improved.

    Here is my rearrangement proposal of the icons:

    I have also removed the separator at the bottom of the Toolbar. Usually
    a separator separate from something.

    btw, there is a little bug with the vertical size of the magnifying
    glass icon:

    Ronan.

    Moet ik naar kijken, maar ik ben nu op m'n werk.

    Mijn neederlands is een beetje ver ;) Geen problemen. Ik zal op mijn
    website deze opmerkingen geschijven!

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.25 | | 604 bytes | |

    Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:12, Ronan Zeegers wrote:


    >! It's true that bugzilla is not that fastest tool to use. But some
    >bugs of usability improvement on the mailing list where not take in
    >consideration.
    >
    >

    Yes. Things may fall through the cracks. That doesn't mean suggestions aren't
    appreciated -- just that we're human.

    The thing can help for now.
    I'll go check the wiki on koffice later

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org
  • No.26 | | 842 bytes | |

    Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:10, Ronan Zeegers wrote:
    Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:38, Ronan Zeegers wrote:
    >it's here:
    >
    >>

    >I will try to keep it up to date and make an announcement every times
    >I'm putting something new on it. It's faster than bugzilla. I'll will go
    >back to bugzilla when Krita will be a bit more "bug free".
    >

    Maybe we should paint a blue border around the whole image canvas when
    everything is selected?

    For now, I think it's the best idea. Maybe with the same red as the
    selection. But for the futur, the marching ants like in the gimp is a
    better solution.
    I disagree

    with marching ants you cannot see if somethin is partially selected
  • No.27 | | 1427 bytes | |

    Casper Boemann wrote:
    Wednesday 06 December 2006 17:10, Ronan Zeegers wrote:

    >Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
    >

    Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:38, Ronan Zeegers wrote:

    it's here:

    I will try to keep it up to date and make an announcement every times
    I'm putting something new on it. It's faster than bugzilla. I'll will go
    back to bugzilla when Krita will be a bit more "bug free".

    Maybe we should paint a blue border around the whole image canvas when
    everything is selected?

    >For now, I think it's the best idea. Maybe with the same red as the
    >selection. But for the futur, the marching ants like in the gimp is a
    >better solution.
    >

    I disagree

    with marching ants you cannot see if somethin is partially selected

    We are talking about a fast solution for a behaviour problem when all is
    selected with Krita1.6 (the explanation is here:
    )

    But for the futur, I think we need both modes (marching ants and gradient).
    They have both there advantages and disadvantages:
    -Marching ants mode give you a clear feedback of the entier image/canveas.
    -The gradient mode let you view more precisely the selected area but
    partially hide the rest of the image/canveas

    kimageshop mailing list
    kimageshop (AT) kde (DOT) org

Re: Smudge paintop


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 8 + 8 =
QUESTION ON "KDE"

EMSDN.COM