DSM

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • JAMES v2.3 RC2 build posted

    9 answers - 504 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    +1 from me, at least on the code side.
    I believe that we've met the licensing requirements, but I would prefer to
    have Cliff confirm things for us. And we'll still need to finish up crypto
    with him before going to full release status, even if we can just keep going
    on this release candidate.
    Noel
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.1 | | 532 bytes | |

    sorry guys, but I am currently away from my test-site :-/
    hope to be able to give RC2 a spin on the weekend. there is no point
    in +1'ing without testing

    thanks for the great work!

    Bernd

    8/11/06, Noel J. Bergman <noel (AT) devtech (DOT) comwrote:
    And folks, still waiting for votes other than mine and Norman's. :-)

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.2 | | 2049 bytes | |

    8/11/06, Noel J. Bergman <noel (AT) devtech (DOT) comwrote:
    Bernd Fondermann wrote:

    I am currently away from my test-site :-/ hope to be able to
    give RC2 a spin on the weekend.

    So far we have +1 from me, Norman and Vincenzo. I've also pinged Cliff to
    make sure that the legal looks good, which it should be from prior e-mails,
    and to do whatever needs to do done NW to get this release candidate
    posted. I'm currently waiting on Cliff's e-mail before copying
    branches/v2.3 to a tag.

    Sorry -- been on the road for the last 48 hours with very little
    online time. I have no further comments than what I offered on the
    other thread; however, I did just take a second look at the latest
    main src and bin releases and saw that there was no NTICE file in the
    bin distro (http://people.apache.org/~).
    Every distribution should always have a LICENSE and NTICE file.
    Releases with crypto should have the crypto text in the README (which
    I think both bin and src had). The format and content of the files
    all seemed good, when they were present.

    Regarding the crypto notification stuff. I think we've already worked
    out all the details with that. The web site and the email form and
    content are all set. You could send the email any time (which I
    linked to a while back at
    http://people.apache.org/~ could
    also create your own email any time by running the XSLT on your own
    RDF file).

    Howeverthere is one thing that would be good to change, if you
    canthe link to the web page in the email should probably (based on
    limited discussion on site-dev) point to
    instead of what it says
    now: I'll set the page up
    there tonight (it will look just like
    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/exports.html), so you can send
    it any time.

    Cliff

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.3 | | 2049 bytes | |

    8/11/06, Noel J. Bergman <noel (AT) devtech (DOT) comwrote:
    Bernd Fondermann wrote:

    I am currently away from my test-site :-/ hope to be able to
    give RC2 a spin on the weekend.

    So far we have +1 from me, Norman and Vincenzo. I've also pinged Cliff to
    make sure that the legal looks good, which it should be from prior e-mails,
    and to do whatever needs to do done NW to get this release candidate
    posted. I'm currently waiting on Cliff's e-mail before copying
    branches/v2.3 to a tag.

    Sorry -- been on the road for the last 48 hours with very little
    online time. I have no further comments than what I offered on the
    other thread; however, I did just take a second look at the latest
    main src and bin releases and saw that there was no NTICE file in the
    bin distro (http://people.apache.org/~).
    Every distribution should always have a LICENSE and NTICE file.
    Releases with crypto should have the crypto text in the README (which
    I think both bin and src had). The format and content of the files
    all seemed good, when they were present.

    Regarding the crypto notification stuff. I think we've already worked
    out all the details with that. The web site and the email form and
    content are all set. You could send the email any time (which I
    linked to a while back at
    http://people.apache.org/~ could
    also create your own email any time by running the XSLT on your own
    RDF file).

    Howeverthere is one thing that would be good to change, if you
    canthe link to the web page in the email should probably (based on
    limited discussion on site-dev) point to
    instead of what it says
    now: I'll set the page up
    there tonight (it will look just like
    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/exports.html), so you can send
    it any time.

    Cliff

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.4 | | 2522 bytes | |

    8/11/06, Noel J. Bergman <noel (AT) devtech (DOT) comwrote:
    Cliff Schmidt wrote:

    I have no further comments than what I offered on the other thread

    And, as I understand it, you are satisified with everything, yes?

    yep -- all my comments appeared to get addressed

    however, I did just take a second look at the latest main [releases]
    and saw that there was no NTICE file in the bin distro

    Fixed. The packages are rerolled and uploading as I type.

    great -- I only spot-checked two of the distros, I assume the PMC
    members on the project are applying these comments to all applicable
    distributions.

    Regarding the crypto notification stuff. I think we've already worked
    out all the details with that. The web site and the email form and
    content are all set. You could send the email any time (which I
    linked to a while back at
    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/james-email.txt

    Howeverthere is one thing that would be good to change, if you
    canthe link to the web page in the email should probably
    (based onlimited discussion on site-dev) point to

    Got it. Since that is supposed to be mailed by the PMC Chair, I'll leave
    that to Serge unless he askes me to do it.

    Serge,
    Actually, I changed the URL one last time*. The email should point to
    The final copy of the email
    that should be sent (with the correct url) has been updated at
    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/james-email.txt.

    Stefano/Serge,
    This doesn't affect the email, but you might want to update any
    instance of to
    I think that
    makes more sense infra-wise. If you do update your RDF with this,
    just let me know and I'll refresh the /licenses/exports/ page.

    Cliff

    *Sorry to change the URL one last time, but since I wanted to make the
    two .xsl files plus the registry available in the same directory, it
    seemed like there should be an exports subdirectory under /licenses,
    not just a set of four related export files. I've also updated
    to reflect the URL change.

    The other files in the /licenses/exports/ dir (aside from index.html) are:
    (which
    points to your RDF file)
    (creates
    email from your RDF file)
    (builds
    site/xdocs .xml file from export-registry.xml)

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.5 | | 1072 bytes | |

    8/11/06, Cliff Schmidt <cliffschmidt (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
    Regarding the crypto notification stuff. I think we've already worked
    out all the details with that. The web site and the email form and
    content are all set. You could send the email any time (which I
    linked to a while back at
    http://people.apache.org/~ could
    also create your own email any time by running the XSLT on your own
    RDF file).

    Howeverthere is one thing that would be good to change, if you
    canthe link to the web page in the email should probably (based on
    limited discussion on site-dev) point to
    instead of what it says
    now: I'll set the page up
    there tonight (it will look just like
    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/exports.html), so you can send
    it any time.

    Thanks for doing so much leg work to see this is done properly! Just
    to double check (since is the first time), I should email:

    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/james-email.txt

    (with the appropriate headers updated)? That's it?
  • No.6 | | 1450 bytes | |

    8/12/06, Serge Knystautas <sknystautas (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
    8/11/06, Cliff Schmidt <cliffschmidt (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
    Regarding the crypto notification stuff. I think we've already worked
    out all the details with that. The web site and the email form and
    content are all set. You could send the email any time (which I
    linked to a while back at
    http://people.apache.org/~ could
    also create your own email any time by running the XSLT on your own
    RDF file).

    Howeverthere is one thing that would be good to change, if you
    canthe link to the web page in the email should probably (based on
    limited discussion on site-dev) point to
    instead of what it says
    now: I'll set the page up
    there tonight (it will look just like
    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/exports.html), so you can send
    it any time.

    Thanks for doing so much leg work to see this is done properly! Just
    to double check (since is the first time), I should email:

    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/james-email.txt

    (with the appropriate headers updated)? That's it?

    yep -- that's it -- that now has the new Notification URL in it
    (instead of the old one above), which is

    Cliff

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.7 | | 205 bytes | |

    8/12/06, Cliff Schmidt <cliffschmidt (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
    yep -- that's it -- that now has the new Notification URL in it
    (instead of the old one above), which is
    sent. Thanks!
  • No.8 | | 864 bytes | |

    8/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <noel (AT) devtech (DOT) comwrote:
    Cliff,

    I just noticed a minor error that you'll want to make to the template that
    generated:

    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/james-email.txt

    It is always The Apache Software Foundation; the template is missing the
    word "The" for both the PINT F CNTACT and MANUFACTURER(S) entries.

    I fixed PC in the email template, but the MANUFACTUER(S) reference
    comes from the project RDF file
    (). I
    was the one who started it off with "Apache Software Foundation", but
    could you or another James person fix it and add the "The"? you
    do, I'll do the refresh.

    Cliff

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.9 | | 946 bytes | |

    Am Sonntag, den 13.08.2006, 07:08 -0700 schrieb Cliff Schmidt:
    8/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <noel (AT) devtech (DOT) comwrote:
    Cliff,

    I just noticed a minor error that you'll want to make to the template that
    generated:

    http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/export/james-email.txt

    It is always The Apache Software Foundation; the template is missing the
    word "The" for both the PINT F CNTACT and MANUFACTURER(S) entries.

    I fixed PC in the email template, but the MANUFACTUER(S) reference
    comes from the project RDF file
    (). I
    was the one who started it off with "Apache Software Foundation", but
    could you or another James person fix it and add the "The"? you
    do, I'll do the refresh.

    Cliff

    Thx Cliff. I fixed it in svn .

    bye
    Norman

    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

    uFIb5W878naKUC5ixg4ljAs=
    =HM8i
    PGP SIGNATURE

Re: JAMES v2.3 RC2 build posted


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 4 + 3 =
QUESTION ON "DSM"

EMSDN.COM