I'm using Luke to manage Lucene 1.9's index

7/20/06, lude <lucene.developer (AT) googlemail (DOT) comwrote:

As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9

Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on
Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
--
7/19/06, Nicolas L <nicolas.lalevee (AT) anyware-tech (DOT) comwrote:

Le Mercredi 19 Juillet 2006 12:32, lude a :
Hi Nicolas,

thanks for answering.

You wrote:
And about Luke, ASAIK too, is a Lucene-2 app, so it will be able to
read
a

1.4

What do you mean?
The luke website stated: "Current version is 0.6. It has been
released
on
16 Feb 2005."
How can Luke be a Lucene-2 application if it was released on Feb 2005?

Yes, I should have not used the word Lucene-2 application, sorry.
BTW, about the index format described here :

there is only concern about if Lucene >= 1.9 or if Lucene <= 1.4. As
Luke
was
release with a Lucene-1.9, it will work with Lucene 2.0 index beacause a
index 1.9 and an index 2.0 are the same.

Nicolas.
--
lude

7/18/06, Nicolas L <nicolas.lalevee (AT) anyware-tech (DOT) comwrote:
Le Mardi 18 Juillet 2006 20:53, lude a :
Hello,

sorry, didn't find the information elsewhere:

1.) Did the format of the lucene-index change between version
1.4.3and
2.0? 2.) Is it possible to use the old Luke-Tool with a new lucene
2

index?

Thanks
lude

ASAIK, the format changed, but in a compatible way : a Lucene-2 app
will
be
able to read a 1.4 index. The index format change is there :

And about Luke, ASAIK too, is a Lucene-2 app, so it will be able to
read
a 1.4
index.

Nicolas
--

To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org

To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
>
>
>
>

lude wrote:
>As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
>
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on
Lucene
Version 1.4.3.

The latest version of Luke was released with an early snapshot of 1.9. I
plan to release a 2.0-based version in a few days.

Hi Andrzej,

a month ago you mentioned a new Lucene 2.0 compatible Version of luke.
Does it exist somewhere?

Thanks
lude

7/20/06, Andrzej Bialecki <ab (AT) getopt (DOT) orgwrote:

lude wrote:
>As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
>
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on
Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
--
The latest version of Luke was released with an early snapshot of 1.9. I
plan to release a 2.0-based version in a few days.

Not sure if it helps, but I have been using Luke (webstart version) from
it's website for quite sometime now for inspecting and manipulating my
indexes built using Lucene 2.0. I may not be a power user of Luke in that
sense, but I haven't found any issues using the basic features.

Gopi

8/25/06, lude <lucene.developer (AT) googlemail (DOT) comwrote:

Hi Andrzej,

a month ago you mentioned a new Lucene 2.0 compatible Version of luke.
Does it exist somewhere?

Thanks
lude
--
7/20/06, Andrzej Bialecki <ab (AT) getopt (DOT) orgwrote:

lude wrote:
>As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
>
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on
Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
--
The latest version of Luke was released with an early snapshot of 1.9. I
plan to release a 2.0-based version in a few days.