BSD

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • nvidia gig ether support

    9 answers - 496 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    I've got a new amd64 system with the Supermicro H8DCE mobo:
    Aside from a DA disk, the SATA controller seems to work fine, (though I
    haven't done any RAID tests - I plan to use RAIDframe).
    But the -current floppy can't find any network ports to use. This is the
    nVideia nForce Pro 2200/2050 chipset.
    Any chance there will be support 'soon'? can someone recommend a
    gigether card that works, in the meantime?
    Thanks,
    chris
  • No.1 | | 226 bytes | |

    Well, that's disappointing. I bought a D-Link DGE-530T, which is claimed
    to be supported at as sk(4), but the
    amd64 kernel doesn't see it.
    What am I likely to be doing wrong here?
    chris
  • No.2 | | 247 bytes | |

    Is there some way to catch the boot messages? I don't seem to be able to
    even use ^S. Are they also being spit out on the console port, perhaps?
    It would be nice to see if the device is being probed, even if not
    configured
  • No.3 | | 412 bytes | |

    Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
    Well, that's disappointing. I bought a D-Link DGE-530T, which is claimed to
    be supported at as sk(4), but the amd64
    kernel doesn't see it.

    What am I likely to be doing wrong here?

    At the very least, give ~zero information to help you.

    Is "sk" in your kernel config file?
    If so, what does dmesg say?

    - Hubert
  • No.4 | | 448 bytes | |

    Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
    Is there some way to catch the boot messages? I don't seem to be able to even
    use ^S. Are they also being spit out on the console port, perhaps? It would
    be nice to see if the device is being probed, even if not configured

    kernel boot messages can be printed by dmesg(8), a copy of that output
    right after booting is usually kept in /var/run/dmesg.boot.

    - Hubert
  • No.5 | | 1051 bytes | |

    Hubert Feyrer wrote:
    Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:

    >Is there some way to catch the boot messages? I don't seem to be able
    >to even use ^S. Are they also being spit out on the console port,
    >perhaps? It would be nice to see if the device is being probed, even
    >if not configured


    kernel boot messages can be printed by dmesg(8), a copy of that output
    right after booting is usually kept in /var/run/dmesg.boot.

    - Hubert

    I'm working from the -current boot floppies. dmesg isn't there, nor is
    there anything in /var/run

    I'm afraid I don't know what's in the config file for the boot floppy. I
    was assuming that it was GENERIC, which has sk/skc in it.

    The DGE-350T and Linksys EG1032 are the only gig ether interfaces on the
    shelf at my local store; they both seem to have the same chipset. Is
    there some other one I should try ordering, that is known to work in the
    amd64 port?

    Thanks.
  • No.6 | | 1170 bytes | |

    Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
    I've got a new amd64 system with the Supermicro H8DCE mobo:

    Aside from a DA disk, the SATA controller seems to work fine, (though I
    haven't done any RAID tests - I plan to use RAIDframe).

    But the -current floppy can't find any network ports to use. This is the
    nVideia nForce Pro 2200/2050 chipset.

    Any chance there will be support 'soon'? can someone recommend a
    gigether card that works, in the meantime?

    Thanks,
    chris

    Well, I pulled a network card from another system that comes up as tlc0.
    Yay. But now I can't find the head of the FTP tree to copy. The floppy
    wants to start at pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-3.0_BETA, which doesn't exist.

    I got the floppy images from
    , which no longer
    exists there's a 200508270000Z directory now, but it's empty.

    So, where *am* I supposed to get sets from when installing the beta?
    do I need to install 2.0.2 and upgrade? The 2.0.2 kernel hasn't been a
    winning thing for me - it's pretty hungry for VM resources, so I thought
    I'd just start with 3.0

    chris
  • No.7 | | 653 bytes | |

    That's tlp0, not tlc0, for anyone that's really paying attention.

    I ended up, for now at least, installing the 2.1-RC3 sets. Didn't really
    work very well, but I got a kernel that seems to support the skc/sk
    DGE-530T (Marvell 88E1011 chipset), at least to the point where it will
    light up the link LED on the hub, even if it doesn't light up its own
    LEDs in any way. Very odd behaviour there - I think I'll try another card

    But the file system isn't really quite right; no big surprise, I guess,
    since I used the 3.0 floppies. Would really like to find the correct
    sets to install
  • No.8 | | 1018 bytes | |

    Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:
    That's tlp0, not tlc0, for anyone that's really paying attention.

    I ended up, for now at least, installing the 2.1-RC3 sets. Didn't really
    work very well, but I got a kernel that seems to support the skc/sk
    DGE-530T (Marvell 88E1011 chipset), at least to the point where it will
    light up the link LED on the hub, even if it doesn't light up its own
    LEDs in any way. Very odd behaviour there - I think I'll try another card

    But the file system isn't really quite right; no big surprise, I guess,
    since I used the 3.0 floppies. Would really like to find the correct
    sets to install

    I'd expect a new 3.0_BETA sets would appear in pub/NetBSD-daily in a few days.
    That's a problem with the current autobuild scripts: for branches, it will
    keep only one instance of the build. So if the build goes bad, you end
    up with no binary sets for the branch on the ftp server :(
  • No.9 | | 1436 bytes | |

    Manuel Bouyer wrote:
    Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:10:25PM -0700, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:

    >That's tlp0, not tlc0, for anyone that's really paying attention.
    >>
    >>I ended up, for now at least, installing the 2.1-RC3 sets. Didn't really
    >>work very well, but I got a kernel that seems to support the skc/sk
    >>DGE-530T (Marvell 88E1011 chipset), at least to the point where it will
    >>light up the link LED on the hub, even if it doesn't light up its own
    >>LEDs in any way. Very odd behaviour there - I think I'll try another card
    >>
    >>But the file system isn't really quite right; no big surprise, I guess,
    >>since I used the 3.0 floppies. Would really like to find the correct
    >>sets to install


    I'd expect a new 3.0_BETA sets would appear in pub/NetBSD-daily in a few days.
    That's a problem with the current autobuild scripts: for branches, it will
    keep only one instance of the build. So if the build goes bad, you end
    up with no binary sets for the branch on the ftp server :(

    K, I'll try to be patient. I tried the 2.1-RC3 'daily' last night and
    had a lot of network problems. I really don't want to drop back to 2.0.2
    if I can avoid it works, but crashes every other day in our usage.

Re: nvidia gig ether support


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 4 + 3 =
QUESTION ON "BSD"

EMSDN.COM