Two reasons.
1) So it's much more obvious when a project is inactive and
low on committers.
2) Tidyness. I hate the thought of the long committer lists just
growing longer and more inaccurate.
I'm looking for a way to represent the active community of a
subproject, and while there might be active individuals who just deal
with answers on the mailing list etc, largely the svn commit lists are
the best way to record this.
Hen
12/2/05, Eric Pugh <epugh (AT) upstate (DOT) comwrote:
I agree with the 1 year mark. I know that there are projects that I
haven't worked on for six months until the itch came back and I had
to scratch it! Is there any reason to remove committers?
Performance? Security? It seems to raise a barrier to reentry for
dormant committers.
Eric
Dec 2, 2005, at 1:58 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
>I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion
>for
>commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
>months.
>>
1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this
project into account.
A commiter active in the mailinglist is also a valuable part of a
project and for the community.
Mario
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
>
>
>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org