Apache

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Committer cleanup

    7 answers - 637 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
    commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    months.
    We have 105 commons committers, and 36 additional sandbox committers.
    We've had 43 committers committing to proper, and 7 extra committing
    to sandbox in the last 6 months.
    Then we'd add back anyone else on request if need be.
    Anyone against the idea?
    Hen
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
  • No.1 | | 839 bytes | |

    12/1/05, Henri Yandell <flamefew (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

    I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
    commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    months.

    We have 105 commons committers, and 36 additional sandbox committers.

    We've had 43 committers committing to proper, and 7 extra committing
    to sandbox in the last 6 months.

    Then we'd add back anyone else on request if need be.

    Anyone against the idea?

    6 months seems quite short if you're only counting commits. Would the
    numbers be significantly different if we use 1 year instead?

    Where do you plan on keeping the list of people removed? It will need to be
    somewhere that we can get at, so that we know who can be added back without
    question.
  • No.2 | | 570 bytes | |

    Henri Yandell wrote:
    I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
    commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    months.

    1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this project
    into account.
    A commiter active in the mailinglist is also a valuable part of a
    project and for the community.

    Mario

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
  • No.3 | | 1389 bytes | |

    12/1/05, Martin Cooper <martinc (AT) apache (DOT) orgwrote:
    12/1/05, Henri Yandell <flamefew (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

    I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
    commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    months.

    We have 105 commons committers, and 36 additional sandbox committers.

    We've had 43 committers committing to proper, and 7 extra committing
    to sandbox in the last 6 months.

    Then we'd add back anyone else on request if need be.

    Anyone against the idea?
    --
    6 months seems quite short if you're only counting commits. Would the
    numbers be significantly different if we use 1 year instead?

    I'll find out. Probably not.

    Where do you plan on keeping the list of people removed? It will need to be
    somewhere that we can get at, so that we know who can be added back without
    question.

    I'll start a file in the Jakarta PMC area in the committers module.
    I'm aiming to do this for all of Jakarta, so it'll be the start of
    that. It'll list each svn module, and who's commit karma has been
    removed.

    Hen

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
  • No.4 | | 930 bytes | |

    12/2/05, Mario Ivankovits <mario (AT) ops (DOT) co.atwrote:
    Henri Yandell wrote:
    I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
    commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    months.

    1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this project
    into account.
    A commiter active in the mailinglist is also a valuable part of a
    project and for the community.

    1 year shouldn't be a problem.

    Mailing lists will be a pain as people don't use their @apache.org
    addresses all the time. Easy solution there is to post the list of
    people I'll end up removing to the list and anyone can request to be
    re-added with no fuss.

    Hen

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
  • No.5 | | 1196 bytes | |

    I agree with the 1 year mark. I know that there are projects that I
    haven't worked on for six months until the itch came back and I had
    to scratch it! Is there any reason to remove committers?
    Performance? Security? It seems to raise a barrier to reentry for
    dormant committers.

    Eric

    Dec 2, 2005, at 1:58 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:

    Henri Yandell wrote:
    >I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion
    >for
    >commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    >months.
    >>

    1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this
    project into account.
    A commiter active in the mailinglist is also a valuable part of a
    project and for the community.

    Mario
    --

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
  • No.6 | | 1037 bytes | |

    12/1/05, Martin Cooper <martinc (AT) apache (DOT) orgwrote:
    12/1/05, Henri Yandell <flamefew (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

    I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion for
    commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    months.

    We have 105 commons committers, and 36 additional sandbox committers.

    We've had 43 committers committing to proper, and 7 extra committing
    to sandbox in the last 6 months.

    Then we'd add back anyone else on request if need be.

    Anyone against the idea?
    --
    6 months seems quite short if you're only counting commits. Would the
    numbers be significantly different if we use 1 year instead?

    FYI,

    In the last year, 53 committers committing to proper, and 8 extra
    committing to the sandbox.

    Hen

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
  • No.7 | | 1969 bytes | |

    Two reasons.

    1) So it's much more obvious when a project is inactive and
    low on committers.

    2) Tidyness. I hate the thought of the long committer lists just
    growing longer and more inaccurate.

    I'm looking for a way to represent the active community of a
    subproject, and while there might be active individuals who just deal
    with answers on the mailing list etc, largely the svn commit lists are
    the best way to record this.

    Hen

    12/2/05, Eric Pugh <epugh (AT) upstate (DOT) comwrote:
    I agree with the 1 year mark. I know that there are projects that I
    haven't worked on for six months until the itch came back and I had
    to scratch it! Is there any reason to remove committers?
    Performance? Security? It seems to raise a barrier to reentry for
    dormant committers.

    Eric

    Dec 2, 2005, at 1:58 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:

    Henri Yandell wrote:
    >I'd like to go ahead and remove all the committers from subversion
    >for
    >commons, and then add back anyone who has committed in the last 6
    >months.
    >>

    1 year - and if possible take the user/dev mailinglist for this
    project into account.
    A commiter active in the mailinglist is also a valuable part of a
    project and for the community.

    Mario
    --

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    --

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help (AT) jakarta (DOT) apache.org

Re: Committer cleanup


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 8 + 7 =
QUESTION ON "Apache"

EMSDN.COM