Networking

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • RBL for bots?

    5 answers - 372 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Has anyone created an RBL, much like (possibly) the BGN list which
    includes the IP addresses of hosts which seem to be "infected" and are
    attempting to brute-force SSH/HTTP, etc?
    It would be fairly easy to setup a dozen or more honeypots and examine
    the logs in order to create an initial list.
    Anyone know of anything like this?
    -Drew
  • No.1 | | 1083 bytes | |

    Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:30:34 EST, Drew Weaver said:

    Has anyone created an RBL, much like (possibly) the BGN list which
    includes the IP addresses of hosts which seem to be "infected" and are
    attempting to brute-force SSH/HTTP, etc?

    It would be fairly easy to setup a dozen or more honeypots and examine
    the logs in order to create an initial list.

    A large percentage of those bots are in DHCP'ed cable/dsl blocks. As such,
    there's 2 questions:

    1) How important is it that you not false-positive an IP that's listed because
    some *previous* owner of the address was pwned?

    2) How important is it that you even accept connections from *anywhere* in
    that DHCP block?

    (Note that there *are* fairly good RBL's of DHCP/dsl/cable blocks out there.
    So it really *is* a question of why those aren't suitable for use in your
    application)

    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

    xerdRXfh6Qs6VvsDmLzdeK4=
    =5HAi
    PGP SIGNATURE
  • No.2 | | 712 bytes | |

    Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Drew Weaver wrote:
    Has anyone created an RBL, much like (possibly) the BGN list which
    includes the IP addresses of hosts which seem to be "infected" and are
    attempting to brute-force SSH/HTTP, etc?

    Bots are rarely single purpose engines. If they have been detected doing
    bad things, they will probably appear in multiple RBLs for multiple
    reasons. If something is in multiple RBLs, even if it hasn't done the
    particular badness you are looking for, its probably just a matter of
    time.

    Perhaps not surprising, some of the porn site vendors appear to have
    the most sophisticated systems for detecting brute force/password sharing
    attacks.
  • No.3 | | 1226 bytes | |

    Valdis.Kletnieks (AT) vt (DOT) edu wrote:
    Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:30:34 EST, Drew Weaver said:

    >Has anyone created an RBL, much like (possibly) the BGN list which
    >includes the IP addresses of hosts which seem to be "infected" and are
    >attempting to brute-force SSH/HTTP, etc?


    >It would be fairly easy to setup a dozen or more honeypots and examine
    >the logs in order to create an initial list.


    A large percentage of those bots are in DHCP'ed cable/dsl blocks. As such,
    there's 2 questions:

    1) How important is it that you not false-positive an IP that's listed because
    some *previous* owner of the address was pwned?

    2) How important is it that you even accept connections from *anywhere* in
    that DHCP block?

    That depends

    Do you sell "Internet service" to you customers or something else. If
    the former then they're actually paying to receive connections from
    anywhere

    (Note that there *are* fairly good RBL's of DHCP/dsl/cable blocks out there.
    So it really *is* a question of why those aren't suitable for use in your
    application)
  • No.4 | | 907 bytes | |

    Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:16:27 PST, Joel Jaeggli said:
    Valdis.Kletnieks (AT) vt (DOT) edu wrote:
    2) How important is it that you even accept connections from *anywhere* in
    that DHCP block?

    That depends

    Do you sell "Internet service" to you customers or something else. If
    the former then they're actually paying to receive connections from
    anywhere

    Then the RBL is irrelevant, as "anywhere" isn't the same as "anywhere that
    isn't in an RBL". :)

    (And anyhow, I'd *hope* that any use of an RBL to filter things on behalf of
    a customer was spelled out in the contract, at least in the fine print that
    most Joe Sixpacks never bother reading, specifically to cover that issue)

    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

    f850/VR8Q4wS/qWYHD6YlpY=
    =DyX
    PGP SIGNATURE
  • No.5 | | 692 bytes | |

    Drew Weaver wrote:
    Has anyone created an RBL, much like (possibly) the BGN list
    which includes the IP addresses of hosts which seem to be "infected"
    and are attempting to brute-force SSH/HTTP, etc?

    It would be fairly easy to setup a dozen or more honeypots and examine
    the logs in order to create an initial list.

    Anyone know of anything like this?

    web.dnsbl.sorbs.net has hosts that do this as well as korgo infected
    machines, and a whole host of other types of vulnerabilities, trojans
    and bots.

    Do be careful about how you use the data, we don't distinguish between
    the types for very good reason.

    Regards,

    Mat

Re: RBL for bots?


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 2 + 2 =
QUESTION ON "Networking"

EMSDN.COM