"DMF" <me@sans.spam.comwrote in message
news:Uh_5m137ZnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@inreach.com
cr88192 wrote
>a few things:
>compression/decompression tends to drive the cpu fairly hard in general;
>the fpu isn't really used in much of any way related to compression as a
>general rule; these tasks being slow is no real surprise
>
The PC used to do comp/decom just fine upto about 3 days ago. I have
aggresively uninstalled anything installed within the past month but it
does
not help.
yes, ok.
>maybe try comparing it against another similar computer, and checking if
>there is any particularly noticable difference wrt how long things take.
>
I work on PCs every day so I have a good feel for how long things should
take. this PC a tiny zip file compressed to about 50KB that expands
to little over 100KB took close to one minute I can watch the progress
bar and it moves very slowly across the range. Normally a zip file this
small
would decomp so fast you can't really see the progress bar. I unzipped
other files just to make sure it was not a corrupted zip file and that's
when
I realized that all zipping is slow. I don't think the hard drive is
slow because
its such a small file and I don't hear any disk thrashing, etc which is
why I
was suspecting the CPU. As a comparision I unzipped a similar file on my
PC when I got back to the office -- don't laugh but its just a P3 running
at
700MHz -- and even on this older slower PC small zip files decomp pretty
fast.
ok, just making sure though
one can never know what some peoples' expectations are.
but, yeah, that is a pretty extreme case.
if it always takes a super long time (not just depending on how long the
comp has been running, the size of the file, ) that is curious.
as for a 700MHz pc, yeah it is older, but I know people still running 500MHz
ones (and older). they work I guess
in my case, I like to have a slightly newer computer though.
>of possible note, however:
>>
>I once encountered a pc that would often crash in these cases (compress
>or decompress a file, and the thing would hard-freeze or reboot).
>
This PC did lockup when the problem first arose. Ever since then its been
slow (but not all task, seems to boot normal, open programs normal etc)
ok, that is curious, sensibly for a temperature problem, it should effect
the performance for more or less everything I would think.
>it was found that the heatsink was not properly latched, and was thus not
>cooling effectively.
>
That's a good idea to check that.
>
>also note that P4 cpus have a feature where if they are overheating, the
>clockrate will be dropped in order to try to reduce the operating
>temperature.
>>
>this may be the problem in this case, so it may make sense to make sure
>that the cpu is being cooled adequately (fan spins good, fins relatively
>free of dust, heat sink latched good and firmly in place, good thermal
>contact, ).
>>
>and so on
>
Thanks for that idea and thank you for your reply.
yeah.
this is a tweaky aspect I guess, as other archs will either just crash, or
worse, if run too hot.
I guess that is one advantage of the intel line:
even if they are more expensive, the things wont fry if there are heatsink
problems, and the fact that they have a metal covering vs an exposed die is
nice.
then again, amd chips are cheaper and still perform well
in the end, a lot comes down to price and performance.
Regards,
David
--