DSM

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)

    5 answers - 622 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi all,
    i think we are now ready to VTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
    build,sign and upload the release You can grab it from:
    http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/
    Plz review
    The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
    release ? should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
    See JAMES-662.
    In the build its not fixed and included
    bye
    Norman
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.1 | | 961 bytes | |

    Norman Maurer wrote:
    Hi all,

    i think we are now ready to VTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
    build,sign and upload the release You can grab it from:

    http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/

    Plz review

    +1 to release 2.3.0RC5 as final.
    Stefano Bagnara

    The only difference between RC5 and the prepared artifact is the version
    number.

    The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
    release ? should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
    See JAMES-662.
    In the build its not fixed and included

    Imho we should release 2.3.0 as is. This "minor" fix and maybe more
    belongs to 2.3.1 or to 2.4.0 (and I guess this decision belongs to some
    day in november).

    Stefano

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.2 | | 759 bytes | |

    +1 for releasing 2.3.0rc5 as 2.3.0 final.

    Vincenzo

    Norman Maurer wrote:
    Hi all,

    i think we are now ready to VTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
    build,sign and upload the release You can grab it from:

    http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/

    Plz review

    The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
    release ? should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
    See JAMES-662.
    In the build its not fixed and included

    Let's leave it out for a future release.

    Vincenzo

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.3 | | 584 bytes | |

    i think we are now ready to VTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
    build,sign and upload the release You can grab it from:

    +1

    The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
    release ? should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
    See JAMES-662.
    In the build its not fixed and included

    Let's leave it out for a future release.

    +1

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.4 | | 1029 bytes | |

    [2.3.0-final]
    +1 Release 2.3.0-final
    [sendmail wrapper]
    +0 fix wrapper in 2.3.0
    -0 Remove the wrapper and keep in trunk
    +1 Fix in next release 2.3.1

    bye,
    Guillermo

    Message
    From: "Norman Maurer" <nm (AT) byteaction (DOT) de>
    To: <server-dev (AT) james (DOT) apache.org>
    Sent: Thursday, 19, 2006 9:28 AM
    Subject: [VTE] JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)

    Hi all,

    i think we are now ready to VTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
    build,sign and upload the release You can grab it from:

    http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/

    Plz review

    The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
    release ? should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
    See JAMES-662.
    In the build its not fixed and included

    bye
    Norman

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
  • No.5 | | 951 bytes | |

    +1, release it.

    Bernd

    10/19/06, Norman Maurer <nm (AT) byteaction (DOT) dewrote:
    Hi all,

    i think we are now ready to VTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
    build,sign and upload the release You can grab it from:

    http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/

    Plz review

    The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
    release ? should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
    See JAMES-662.
    In the build its not fixed and included

    bye
    Norman
    >
    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    --

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe (AT) james (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help (AT) james (DOT) apache.org

Re: JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 9 + 8 =
QUESTION ON "DSM"

EMSDN.COM