Java

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • About search performance

    2 answers - 329 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    HiHow about implement multi-key search use lucene, for example use
    boolean search exceed 1000 clauses,it will affect the performance
    greatly. If use filter or custom sorter to select the result, because
    the result is extremely large in amount,so the performance is lower.
    Please give me some advice,Thanks.
  • No.1 | | 788 bytes | |

    Sat, 2006-07-29 at 09:46 +0800, zhongyi yuan wrote:
    HHow about implement multi-key search use lucene, for example use
    boolean search exceed 1000 clauses,it will affect the performance
    greatly. If use filter or custom sorter to select the result, because
    the result is extremely large in amount,so the performance is lower.
    Please give me some advice,Thanks.

    I don't understand your question?

    If you ask "should I use filter or boolean query to get optimal
    performance?", then it depends on your corpus and the query. The easiest
    way to find out is to benchmark your options.

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
  • No.2 | | 449 bytes | |

    My question is about deal with the multi clauses booleanQuery, the
    num of clauses is giant and induce the performance.So I want some
    other method to replace this query to improve the performance. Now
    through filter achieve the goal.

    Thanks for the suggestions.

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org

Re: About search performance


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 3 + 2 =
QUESTION ON "Java"

EMSDN.COM