Apache

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Release mod_aspdotnet build 2004?

    6 answers - 866 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Build 2004 of mod_aspdotnet is prepared (after a number of abortive
    attempts due to the whole 2.0/2.2 partitioning and renaming of apache.exe,
    along with switching flavors of InstallShield to a version I have installed)
    and seeking voters. The update is here;
    Please cast your +/- 1's to release
    (along with associated binaries 2.0.0.2004.msi and 2.2.0.2004.msi,
    one corresponding to 2.0.44 and later, the other to 2.2.2 and later).
    This is the last expected release on the Visual Studio .NET (al la 2002)
    compiler toolchain; the next effort is porting it to VS 2005 (al la, the
    one available in a free flavor). Porting breaks compatibility with the
    older tools, since VS 2005's CNET schema is miles beyond 2002. For
    example, a reference becomes a reference, not an overloaded psuedo-pointer.
    Bill
  • No.1 | | 1176 bytes | |

    Well i can't vote but since no-one seem to be replying

    I've installed it on:
    S: Windows XP Pro x46
    Server: httpd 2.2.2 (self compiled)

    I tested a few ASP.net sample I found on the net and all worked.

    7/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe (AT) rowe-clan (DOT) netwrote:

    Build 2004 of mod_aspdotnet is prepared (after a number of abortive
    attempts due to the whole 2.0/2.2 partitioning and renaming of apache.exe,
    along with switching flavors of InstallShield to a version I have
    installed)
    and seeking voters. The update is here;

    Please cast your +/- 1's to release
    (along with associated binaries 2.0.0.2004.msi and 2.2.0.2004.msi,
    one corresponding to 2.0.44 and later, the other to 2.2.2 and later).

    This is the last expected release on the Visual Studio .NET (al la 2002)
    compiler toolchain; the next effort is porting it to VS 2005 (al la, the
    one available in a free flavor). Porting breaks compatibility with the
    older tools, since VS 2005's CNET schema is miles beyond 2002. For
    example, a reference becomes a reference, not an overloaded
    psuedo-pointer.

    Bill
  • No.2 | | 397 bytes | |

    Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
    Well i can't vote but since no-one seem to be replying

    FWIW - everyone can vote ;-) It's a matter of the counting that's the
    issue. In any case thank you for the testing and your feedback.

    x46 e.g. x64 amd build of 2.2.2? You self compiled mod_aspdotnet from the
    zip source package? It would be additional useful information.
  • No.3 | | 239 bytes | |

    William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
    FWIW - everyone can vote ;-) It's a matter of the counting that's the
    issue. In any case thank you for the testing and your feedback.
    If anyone can vote then +1 from me.
    -Daquell
  • No.4 | | 438 bytes | |

    WDaquell wrote:
    William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
    >FWIW - everyone can vote ;-) It's a matter of the counting that's the
    >issue. In any case thank you for the testing and your feedback.

    If anyone can vote then +1 from me.

    Thanks Daquell :) But can you please mention what you reviewed or tested,
    so that other PMC members can cast educated votes based on your decision?
  • No.5 | | 1488 bytes | |

    Ping to the committee and interested users;

    vote began early on 7/7 and will close early on 7/17. Three +1's of the PMC
    are required to release this software, with more +'s than -'s. voters
    are welcome to chime in with advisory votes to help the PMC.

    7/17 the software will be released, or this software will be ejected from
    the httpd PMC and the module officially shuttered. This is just your friendly
    midpoint reminder.

    And after my own review (which I don't until after rolling it), +1 for release.

    Bill

    William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
    Build 2004 of mod_aspdotnet is prepared (after a number of abortive
    attempts due to the whole 2.0/2.2 partitioning and renaming of apache.exe,
    along with switching flavors of InstallShield to a version I have
    installed)
    and seeking voters. The update is here;

    Please cast your +/- 1's to release
    (along with associated binaries 2.0.0.2004.msi and 2.2.0.2004.msi,
    one corresponding to 2.0.44 and later, the other to 2.2.2 and later).

    This is the last expected release on the Visual Studio .NET (al la 2002)
    compiler toolchain; the next effort is porting it to VS 2005 (al la, the
    one available in a free flavor). Porting breaks compatibility with the
    older tools, since VS 2005's CNET schema is miles beyond 2002. For
    example, a reference becomes a reference, not an overloaded psuedo-pointer.

    Bill

    .
  • No.6 | | 747 bytes | |

    Binary looks good on 2.0.58 - runs Windows Server Update Services with
    zero problems. Because I'm roughly 10000 km from my test machine (and
    will remain so until July 27), I haven't gotten around to testing it on
    2.2.2, but I believe there will be no problems on 2.2.x. Can't compile
    source either, owing to the fact that I do not have VS.NET 2002
    installed on this machine. I give this build my non-binding +1.

    To everyone out there, especially the PMC: _please_ don't let
    mod_aspdotnet die out so easily mod_aspdotnet is the only hope for
    Windows users who despise IIS but do need ASP.NET. :( Throw in your
    votes before 7/17 and make the effort to save this module from its Doomsday.

Re: Release mod_aspdotnet build 2004?


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 5 + 4 =
QUESTION ON "Apache"

EMSDN.COM