Networking

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • AW: Thoughts on Interplanetary Jabber System ?

    0 answers - 713 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi,
    I guess we should accept light speed as a limit. That's not the question. The question is rather: which protocols are appropriate for IM in the face of light lag. And the answer is: protocols without round trips. In this respect Jabber is better than SMTP, because it does not require a round trip on the app level protocol to deliver a message. Both break at the TCP level unless TCP is modified, which is a hobby of Vint (I am the father of the internet) Cerf. Simply speaking, if there is a SI layer 4 solution, then IM wins against Email. But on the other hand I am sure that there will be a no-round-trip version of SMTP, which essentially is an IM protocol then.
    _happy_coding()
    hw

Re: AW: Thoughts on Interplanetary Jabber System ?


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 3 + 3 =
QUESTION ON "Networking"

EMSDN.COM