Java

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • old m1 pages still visible

    9 answers - 773 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Going through an m1 web-site clean-up, I found that there are still a
    couple of old m1 pages visible on the main maven site that are not
    redirected, see below for a list of examples (not complete!). Some of
    these pages are grossly out of date and misleading now, especially since
    they contribute to the m1-m2 confusion of new users. Any objections if I
    just remove those pages?
    -Lukas
    http://maven.apache.org/about/
    http://maven.apache.org/misc/
    http://maven.apache.org/start/
    http://maven.apache.org/style/
    http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    and a couple of old reports.
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
  • No.1 | | 1623 bytes | |

    Hi Lukas,

    We need to be sure that all links below are not used by the actual
    m1/m2 documentation. I found quickly in the m2 doc (rev 425796):

    site\trunk\src\site\fml\about.fml

    http://maven.apache.org/xref/

    plugins\trunk\maven-jxr-plugin\src\site\site.xml

    plugins\trunk\maven-site-plugin\src\site\apt\examples\sitedescriptor.apt

    To be replaced by

    In the same way,

    seems to replace by

    trunk\src\site\apt\guides\getting-started\index.apt
    trunk\src\site\apt\guides\introduction\

    I probably missed other links

    Cheers,

    Vincent

    2006/7/26, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl (AT) apache (DOT) org>:

    Going through an m1 web-site clean-up, I found that there are still a
    couple of old m1 pages visible on the main maven site that are not
    redirected, see below for a list of examples (not complete!). Some of
    these pages are grossly out of date and misleading now, especially since
    they contribute to the m1-m2 confusion of new users. Any objections if I
    just remove those pages?

    -Lukas
    --
    http://maven.apache.org/about/

    http://maven.apache.org/misc/
    http://maven.apache.org/start/
    http://maven.apache.org/style/
    http://maven.apache.org/xref/

    and a couple of old reports.

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    --

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
  • No.2 | | 2549 bytes | |

    That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just out
    of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see why
    some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these pages
    should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the corresponding files
    would allow us to easily catch those outdated links via the linkcheck
    report.
    -Lukas

    Vincent Siveton wrote:
    Hi Lukas,

    We need to be sure that all links below are not used by the actual
    m1/m2 documentation. I found quickly in the m2 doc (rev 425796):

    site\trunk\src\site\fml\about.fml

    >http://maven.apache.org/xref/


    plugins\trunk\maven-jxr-plugin\src\site\site.xml

    plugins\trunk\maven-site-plugin\src\site\apt\examples\sitedescriptor.apt

    To be replaced by

    In the same way,

    seems to replace by

    trunk\src\site\apt\guides\getting-started\index.apt
    trunk\src\site\apt\guides\introduction\

    I probably missed other links

    Cheers,

    Vincent

    2006/7/26, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl (AT) apache (DOT) org>:

    >>

    >Going through an m1 web-site clean-up, I found that there are still a
    >couple of old m1 pages visible on the main maven site that are not
    >redirected, see below for a list of examples (not complete!). Some of
    >these pages are grossly out of date and misleading now, especially since
    >they contribute to the m1-m2 confusion of new users. Any objections if I
    >just remove those pages?
    >>

    >-Lukas
    >>
    >>

    >http://maven.apache.org/about/
    >
    >
    >http://maven.apache.org/misc/
    >http://maven.apache.org/start/
    >http://maven.apache.org/style/
    >http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >
    >>

    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >>

    >and a couple of old reports.
    >>

    >
    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>


    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
  • No.3 | | 3385 bytes | |

    I tried to fix the invalid links to m1 pages in m2 documentation some weeks
    ago but I had an error when I commited.
    I certainly don't have the rights to commit on the m2 components.

    Arnaud

    7/26/06, Lukas Theussl <theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) cawrote:

    That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just out
    of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see why
    some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these pages
    should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the corresponding files
    would allow us to easily catch those outdated links via the linkcheck
    report.

    -Lukas
    --
    Vincent Siveton wrote:
    Hi Lukas,

    We need to be sure that all links below are not used by the actual
    m1/m2 documentation. I found quickly in the m2 doc (rev 425796):
    >
    >
    >
    >

    site\trunk\src\site\fml\about.fml
    >
    >http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >
    >

    plugins\trunk\maven-jxr-plugin\src\site\site.xml
    >
    >
    >
    >

    plugins\trunk\maven-site-plugin\src\site\apt\examples\sitedescriptor.apt

    To be replaced by

    In the same way,

    seems to replace by

    trunk\src\site\apt\guides\getting-started\index.apt
    trunk\src\site\apt\guides\introduction\

    I probably missed other links

    Cheers,

    Vincent

    2006/7/26, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl (AT) apache (DOT) org>:
    >
    >>

    >Going through an m1 web-site clean-up, I found that there are still a
    >couple of old m1 pages visible on the main maven site that are not
    >redirected, see below for a list of examples (not complete!). Some of
    >these pages are grossly out of date and misleading now, especially

    since
    >they contribute to the m1-m2 confusion of new users. Any objections if

    I
    >just remove those pages?
    >>

    >-Lukas
    >>
    >>

    >http://maven.apache.org/about/
    >
    >
    >http://maven.apache.org/misc/
    >http://maven.apache.org/start/
    >http://maven.apache.org/style/
    >http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >
    >>

    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >>

    >and a couple of old reports.
    >>

    >
    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>

    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    --
    --

    Lukas Theussl
    TRIUMF email: theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) ca
    4004 Wesbrook Mall tel.: + 1 604 222 1047 ext. 6446
    Vancouver, British Columbia

    Canada V6T 2A3

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    --
  • No.4 | | 4590 bytes | |

    I've double checked that you do. What was the error?

    27/07/2006 7:42 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
    I tried to fix the invalid links to m1 pages in m2 documentation some weeks
    ago but I had an error when I commited.
    I certainly don't have the rights to commit on the m2 components.

    Arnaud

    7/26/06, Lukas Theussl <theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) cawrote:
    >>

    >That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just out
    >of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see why
    >some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these pages
    >should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the corresponding files
    >would allow us to easily catch those outdated links via the linkcheck
    >report.
    >>

    >-Lukas
    >>
    >>

    >Vincent Siveton wrote:
    >Hi Lukas,
    >>

    >We need to be sure that all links below are not used by the actual
    >m1/m2 documentation. I found quickly in the m2 doc (rev 425796):
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >site\trunk\src\site\fml\about.fml
    >>
    >>http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >>
    >>

    >plugins\trunk\maven-jxr-plugin\src\site\site.xml
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    >plugins\trunk\maven-site-plugin\src\site\apt\examples\sitedescriptor.apt
    >>

    >To be replaced by
    >>

    >In the same way,
    >
    >seems to replace by
    >
    >>

    >trunk\src\site\apt\guides\getting-started\index.apt
    >trunk\src\site\apt\guides\introduction\
    >>

    >I probably missed other links
    >>

    >Cheers,
    >>

    >Vincent
    >>

    >2006/7/26, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl (AT) apache (DOT) org>:
    >>
    >>>

    >>Going through an m1 web-site clean-up, I found that there are still a
    >>couple of old m1 pages visible on the main maven site that are not
    >>redirected, see below for a list of examples (not complete!). Some of
    >>these pages are grossly out of date and misleading now, especially

    >since
    >>they contribute to the m1-m2 confusion of new users. Any objections if

    >I
    >>just remove those pages?
    >>>

    >>-Lukas
    >>>
    >>>

    >>http://maven.apache.org/about/
    >>
    >>
    >>http://maven.apache.org/misc/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/start/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/style/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >>
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>

    >>and a couple of old reports.
    >>>

    >>
    >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>>
    >>>

    >>

    >
    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>

    >--
    >>

    >
    >>
    >>

    >Lukas Theussl
    >TRIUMF email: theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) ca
    >4004 Wesbrook Mall tel.: + 1 604 222 1047 ext. 6446
    >Vancouver, British Columbia
    >
    >Canada V6T 2A3
    >>

    >
    >>
    >>

    >
    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>
  • No.5 | | 607 bytes | |

    27/07/2006 5:43 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
    That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just out
    of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see why
    some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these pages
    should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the corresponding files
    would allow us to easily catch those outdated links via the linkcheck
    report.

    I agree with this.

    I think it's worth redirecting anything that gets deleted to an
    equivalent new page (so that Google can find it).
    - Brett
  • No.6 | | 5302 bytes | |

    I don't remember.
    I'll do another try to tell you what was the error.
    It could be possible that it was due to the new setup on my computer.

    Thx

    arnaud

    7/27/06, Brett Porter <brett (AT) apache (DOT) orgwrote:

    I've double checked that you do. What was the error?

    27/07/2006 7:42 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
    I tried to fix the invalid links to m1 pages in m2 documentation some
    weeks
    ago but I had an error when I commited.
    I certainly don't have the rights to commit on the m2 components.

    Arnaud
    --
    7/26/06, Lukas Theussl <theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) cawrote:
    >>

    >That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just

    out
    >of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see why
    >some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these pages
    >should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the corresponding files
    >would allow us to easily catch those outdated links via the linkcheck
    >report.
    >>

    >-Lukas
    >>
    >>

    >Vincent Siveton wrote:
    >Hi Lukas,
    >>

    >We need to be sure that all links below are not used by the actual
    >m1/m2 documentation. I found quickly in the m2 doc (rev 425796):
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >site\trunk\src\site\fml\about.fml
    >>
    >>http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >>
    >>

    >plugins\trunk\maven-jxr-plugin\src\site\site.xml
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    plugins\trunk\maven-site-plugin\src\site\apt\examples\sitedescriptor.apt
    >>

    >To be replaced by
    >>

    >In the same way,
    >
    >seems to replace by
    >
    >>

    >trunk\src\site\apt\guides\getting-started\index.apt
    >trunk\src\site\apt\guides\introduction\introductio n-

    to-repositories.apt
    >>

    >I probably missed other links
    >>

    >Cheers,
    >>

    >Vincent
    >>

    >2006/7/26, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl (AT) apache (DOT) org>:
    >>
    >>>

    >>Going through an m1 web-site clean-up, I found that there are still

    a
    >>couple of old m1 pages visible on the main maven site that are not
    >>redirected, see below for a list of examples (not complete!). Some

    of
    >>these pages are grossly out of date and misleading now, especially

    >since
    >>they contribute to the m1-m2 confusion of new users. Any objections

    if
    >I
    >>just remove those pages?
    >>>

    >>-Lukas
    >>>
    >>>

    >>http://maven.apache.org/about/
    >>
    >>
    >>http://maven.apache.org/misc/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/start/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/style/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >>
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>

    >>and a couple of old reports.
    >>>
    >>>


    >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>>
    >>>

    >>

    >
    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>

    >--
    >>
    >>


    >>
    >>

    >Lukas Theussl
    >TRIUMF email: theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) ca
    >4004 Wesbrook Mall tel.: + 1 604 222 1047 ext.

    6446
    >Vancouver, British Columbia
    >
    >Canada V6T 2A3
    >>
    >>


    >>
    >>

    >
    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>

    >
    >
    >
  • No.7 | | 1385 bytes | |

    After a bit more systematic survey, here's what I propose:

    Remove with http redirect:

    http://maven.apache.org/about/ -
    -
    http://maven.apache.org/start/ -
    http://maven.apache.org/style/ -
    -
    -
    -

    Plain remove:

    http://maven.apache.org/xref/

    Not sure about the following (some might have historical value :) )

    http://maven.apache.org/misc/

    (this is a copy of goals.html)

    (this one's worth an update! ;) )

    Any thoughts/objections?
    -Lukas

    Brett Porter wrote:

    27/07/2006 5:43 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:

    >That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just
    >out of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see
    >why some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these
    >pages should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the
    >corresponding files would allow us to easily catch those outdated
    >links via the linkcheck report.


    I agree with this.

    I think it's worth redirecting anything that gets deleted to an
    equivalent new page (so that Google can find it).
    - Brett

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
  • No.8 | | 1557 bytes | |

    ok for me

    Arnaud.

    7/27/06, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl (AT) apache (DOT) orgwrote:

    After a bit more systematic survey, here's what I propose:

    Remove with http redirect:

    http://maven.apache.org/about/ ->
    ->

    http://maven.apache.org/start/ -
    http://maven.apache.org/style/ -

    ->
    ->
    ->

    --

    Plain remove:

    http://maven.apache.org/xref/

    Not sure about the following (some might have historical value :) )

    http://maven.apache.org/misc/

    (this is a copy of goals.html)

    (this one's worth an update! ;) )
    --
    Any thoughts/objections?

    -Lukas
    --
    Brett Porter wrote:
    --
    27/07/2006 5:43 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
    >
    >That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just
    >out of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see
    >why some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these
    >pages should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the
    >corresponding files would allow us to easily catch those outdated
    >links via the linkcheck report.
    >
    >

    I agree with this.

    I think it's worth redirecting anything that gets deleted to an
    equivalent new page (so that Google can find it).

    - Brett

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    --
  • No.9 | | 5593 bytes | |

    It works Brett,

    I just fixed some links

    Thanks.

    Arnaud

    7/27/06, Arnaud HERITIER <aheritier (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:

    I don't remember.
    I'll do another try to tell you what was the error.
    It could be possible that it was due to the new setup on my computer.

    Thx

    arnaud
    >
    >
    >

    7/27/06, Brett Porter <brett (AT) apache (DOT) orgwrote:

    I've double checked that you do. What was the error?

    27/07/2006 7:42 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
    I tried to fix the invalid links to m1 pages in m2 documentation some
    weeks
    ago but I had an error when I commited.
    I certainly don't have the rights to commit on the m2 components.

    Arnaud
    --
    7/26/06, Lukas Theussl <theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) cawrote:
    >>

    >That's exactly the reason why I'm asking. Since these pages are just

    out
    >of date, we shouldn't be linking to them at all. Also I don't see why
    >some m2 pages should refer to some old m1 documentation, these pages
    >should be integrated into the m2 site. Removing the corresponding

    files
    >would allow us to easily catch those outdated links via the linkcheck
    >report.
    >>

    >-Lukas
    >>
    >>

    >Vincent Siveton wrote:
    >Hi Lukas,
    >>

    >We need to be sure that all links below are not used by the actual
    >m1/m2 documentation. I found quickly in the m2 doc (rev 425796):
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >site\trunk\src\site\fml\about.fml
    >>
    >>http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >>
    >>

    >plugins\trunk\maven-jxr-plugin\src\site\site.xml
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    plugins\trunk\maven-site-plugin\src\site\apt\examples\sitedescriptor.apt
    >>

    >To be replaced by
    >>

    >In the same way,
    >
    >seems to replace by
    >
    >>

    >trunk\src\site\apt\guides\getting-started\index.apt
    >trunk\src\site\apt\guides\introduction\introductio n-

    to-repositories.apt
    >>

    >I probably missed other links
    >>

    >Cheers,
    >>

    >Vincent
    >>

    >2006/7/26, Lukas Theussl <ltheussl (AT) apache (DOT) org>:
    >>
    >>>

    >>Going through an m1 web-site clean-up, I found that there are

    still a
    >>couple of old m1 pages visible on the main maven site that are not
    >>redirected, see below for a list of examples (not complete!). Some

    of
    >>these pages are grossly out of date and misleading now, especially

    >
    >since
    >>they contribute to the m1-m2 confusion of new users. Any

    objections if
    >I
    >>just remove those pages?
    >>>

    >>-Lukas
    >>>
    >>>

    >>http://maven.apache.org/about/
    >>
    >>
    >>http://maven.apache.org/misc/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/start/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/style/
    >>http://maven.apache.org/xref/
    >>
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>

    >>and a couple of old reports.
    >>>
    >>>


    >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >>


    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>

    >--
    >>
    >>


    >
    >>
    >>

    >Lukas Theussl
    >TRIUMF email: theussl (AT) triumf (DOT) ca
    >4004 Wesbrook Mall tel.: + 1 604 222 1047 ext.

    6446
    >Vancouver, British Columbia
    >
    >Canada V6T 2A3
    >>
    >>


    >
    >>
    >>

    >
    >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help (AT) maven (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>

    >
    >
    >

Re: old m1 pages still visible


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 3 + 2 =
QUESTION ON "Java"

EMSDN.COM