XML

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Non locator use of URIs

    5 answers - 589 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    I'm collecting a list of non-locating, identifying uses of URIs. e.g.
    where are URIs used in practice as identifying strings? So far I have:
    XML Namespaces
    SAX Feature and Properties
    Atom IDs
    RDF//SemWeb
    XML encryption data types and algorithms
    XML canonicalization algorithms
    Can anyone add to this list? The criterion is that the URI is not
    necessarily resolvable, and not intended primarily to be resolved. It's
    K is some can be (e.g. RDDL documents for XML namespaces) as long as it
    doesn't have to be to serve its main function.
  • No.1 | | 1606 bytes | |

    At 2005-12-24 11:46 -0500, Elliotte Harold wrote:
    >I'm collecting a list of non-locating, identifying uses of URIs.
    >e.g. where are URIs used in practice as identifying strings? So far I have:
    >
    >XML Namespaces
    >SAX Feature and Properties
    >Atom IDs
    >RDF//SemWeb
    >XML encryption data types and algorithms
    >XML canonicalization algorithms
    >
    >Can anyone add to this list? The criterion is that the URI is not
    >necessarily resolvable, and not intended primarily to be resolved.
    >It's K is some can be (e.g. RDDL documents for XML namespaces) as
    >long as it doesn't have to be to serve its main function.


    (1) To qualify the top-level constructs of XSLT stylesheets: every
    named user stylesheet construct in XSLT is a namespace-qualified
    name, though most people use no namespace for these names. It is
    important in top-level constructs to use namespace qualification when
    using the import tree to pull in many stylesheet fragments from
    different development teams. To ensure no unintended name conflicts
    you want to isolate the top-level constructs with unique namespace URI strings.

    (2) To identify colour profiles in XSL-F instances: one maps a
    local name to a URI string recognized by an XSL-F engine as
    representing a particular colour rendering system. Then, in the
    XSL-F, one engages the use of a colour system through the local name.

    No namespace resolution is at all involved in these distinctions.

    . . . . . . . . . . Ken
  • No.2 | | 1023 bytes | |

    Elliotte Harold wrote:
    I'm collecting a list of non-locating, identifying uses of URIs. e.g.
    where are URIs used in practice as identifying strings? So far I have:

    XML Namespaces
    SAX Feature and Properties
    Atom IDs
    RDF//SemWeb
    XML encryption data types and algorithms
    XML canonicalization algorithms

    Can anyone add to this list? The criterion is that the URI is not
    necessarily resolvable, and not intended primarily to be resolved. It's
    K is some can be (e.g. RDDL documents for XML namespaces) as long as it
    doesn't have to be to serve its main function.

    SVG feature strings:

    /niklas

    Niklas Gustavsson
    http://www.protocol7.com
    mailto:niklas (AT) protocol7 (DOT) com

    The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
    initiative of ASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

    The list archives are at

    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
    manager: <>
  • No.3 | | 1703 bytes | |

    XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 error identifiers are URIs that are not required
    (or expected?) to be resolvable.

    Hope this helps,
    Jim

    At 12/24/2005 09:46 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:
    >I'm collecting a list of non-locating, identifying uses of URIs. e.g.
    >where are URIs used in practice as identifying strings? So far I have:
    >
    >XML Namespaces
    >SAX Feature and Properties
    >Atom IDs
    >RDF//SemWeb
    >XML encryption data types and algorithms
    >XML canonicalization algorithms
    >
    >
    >Can anyone add to this list? The criterion is that the URI is not
    >necessarily resolvable, and not intended primarily to be resolved. It's K
    >is some can be (e.g. RDDL documents for XML namespaces) as long as it
    >doesn't have to be to serve its main function.


    Jim Melton Editor of IS/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144
    Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F& (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345
    Corporation Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
    1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
    Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name

    = Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions =
    = only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody =
    = else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. =

    The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
    initiative of ASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

    The list archives are at

    To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
    manager: <>
  • No.4 | | 400 bytes | |

    12/25/05, Elliotte Harold <elharo (AT) metalab (DOT) unc.eduwrote:
    I'm collecting a list of non-locating, identifying uses of URIs. e.g.
    where are URIs used in practice as identifying strings?

    This might fit in the SemWeb construct, but in Topic Maps the concept
    of PSI (Published Subject Indicator) [persistant identifiers] are
    unresolvable URI's.
    (#)

    Alex
  • No.5 | | 273 bytes | |

    Jim Melton wrote:
    XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 error identifiers are URIs that are not
    required (or expected?) to be resolvable.
    The same is true also for collations in XQuery 1.0/XSLT 2.0.
    RELAX NG uses URIs to identify datatype libraries.
    Jirka

Re: Non locator use of URIs


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 1 + 0 =
QUESTION ON "XML"

EMSDN.COM