Mozilla

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Upgrade from 2.17.4 to 2.18 or 2.20

    2 answers - 853 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    We're planning on upgrading our heavily customized 2.17.4 version of
    Bugzilla to a more recent version and I'm looking for your experiences
    with 2.18.X and 2.20.X as well as your suggestions about which version
    we should upgrade to.
    Have you found 2.18.X to be very stable (fairly bug-free)?
    How about 2.20.X?
    We tried to make use of the "Custom Field" patch that is available and a
    previous employee here installed an incomplete version so we have it
    partially working. Has the patch been upgraded to work with these two
    versions? Is it complete (can you do advanced queries on Custom Fields
    without getting the Internal Server error)?
    Thanks for your consideration.
    Steve Blumenkrantz
    support-bugzilla mailing list
    support-bugzilla (AT) lists (DOT) mozilla.org
  • No.1 | | 1702 bytes | |

    As someone else who's had a relatively customized install, we went from
    2.16 to 2.18 and are now going to 2.20. Given the number of improvements
    and move towards templates in 2.20, I'd suggest going straight there.
    Then you won't have to double your efforts to upgrade to 2.20 later.
    Not to mention, 2.20 has significant improvements over 2.18. There's
    also a handful of schema changes between the two, so even more reason to
    go to 2.20 directly. You wouldn't have to settle conflicts more than
    once. course, that all depends on if the "Custom Field" patch is
    available for 2.20. We don't use that, so I can't say.

    Todd

    Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:01:21AM -0500, Blumenkrantz, Steve wrote:
    We're planning on upgrading our heavily customized 2.17.4 version of
    Bugzilla to a more recent version and I'm looking for your experiences
    with 2.18.X and 2.20.X as well as your suggestions about which version
    we should upgrade to.

    Have you found 2.18.X to be very stable (fairly bug-free)?

    How about 2.20.X?

    We tried to make use of the "Custom Field" patch that is available and a
    previous employee here installed an incomplete version so we have it
    partially working. Has the patch been upgraded to work with these two
    versions? Is it complete (can you do advanced queries on Custom Fields
    without getting the Internal Server error)?

    Thanks for your consideration.

    Steve Blumenkrantz

    support-bugzilla mailing list
    support-bugzilla (AT) lists (DOT) mozilla.org

    support-bugzilla mailing list
    support-bugzilla (AT) lists (DOT) mozilla.org
  • No.2 | | 862 bytes | |

    Fri, 2006-01-13 at 11:01 -0500, Blumenkrantz, Steve wrote:
    Have you found 2.18.X to be very stable (fairly bug-free)?

    How about 2.20.X?

    Yeah, 2.20.X is very stable. I would definitely recommend going with
    that.

    We tried to make use of the Custom F patch that is available and
    a previous employee here installed an incomplete version so we have it
    partially working. Has the patch been upgraded to work with these two
    versions? Is it complete (can you do advanced queries on Custom
    Fields without getting the Internal Server error)?

    That patch actually isn't (and never will be) an official part of
    Bugzilla. We will be releasing Custom Field support, but it will be much
    better-integrated into Bugzilla and be much more feature-complete. We
    currently have initial code ready for Bugzilla 2.24.
    -Max

Re: Upgrade from 2.17.4 to 2.18 or 2.20


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 6 + 6 =
QUESTION ON "Mozilla"

EMSDN.COM