Apache

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • AW: Oneway ws and reliability

    2 answers - 10368 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi,
    just jumping in here with a question: isn't
    Benajmin's requirements more related to a transaction
    manager than to Reliable Message? Transactions
    management would imply to have reliable messages (and
    probably a sequence) plus the guarantee that all
    services have their tasks done (all or nothing
    principle).
    You may have a look at
    IMH the specs defined there address Ben's problem.
    Regards,
    Werner
    Nachricht
    Von: jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk [mailto:jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk]
    Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 03:50
    An: Benjamin Schmeling
    Cc: sandesha-dev (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    Betreff: Re: ws and reliability
    Hi,
    WS-RM guarantees delivery of messages from one endpoint to
    the other. Mainly
    between endpoint managers. So there is no way that we can put
    messages going
    to different endpoints into a single sequence. This is not
    what WS-RM for
    and rather is useful when we have many massages to the same endpoint
    Thanks,
    Jaliya
    Message
    From: "Benjamin Schmeling" <Benjamin_Schmeling (AT) gmx (DOT) de>
    Cc: <sandesha-dev (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org>
    Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:39 PM
    Subject: Re: ws and reliability
    Hi,
    concerning different endpoint it is not possible to put them in one
    sequence. But what is when you have calls on different web
    services on one
    maschine. Is it possible to put them all in one sequence
    and how is it
    done in sandesha? I tried it out but got an ERRR: MESSAGE
    IS NULL IN
    ResponseSeqHash.
    Thanks,
    Benjamin
    >
    >Hi,
    >IMH it is not a feature that should be covered by WS-RM,

    it should be a
    >feature of the underlying SAP engine.
    >For RM all these messages are different sequence if they

    are going to
    >different endpoints. So if we need to send one message to

    2000 stores
    >then it will be a 2000 sequence and lot of additional

    messages. We can
    >use RM but there is are additional overhead involve in it.

    However it the
    >scenario is such that we need to send 2000 messages to

    same recipient,
    >then RM is for that and will serve well.
    >Thanks,
    >Jaliya
    >>

    >Message
    >*From:* IV <mailto:spartan2iv (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
    >*To:* jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk <mailto:jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk>
    >*Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2005 3:04 AM
    >*Subject:* Re: ws and reliability
    >>

    >Hi,
    >Thx for the response. However i think the Spec of WS-RM had to
    >think about reliably talking to many WS with same

    message without
    >any interation of sequences. I tried to loop 2000

    times for 2000
    >stores and for each store i had just to change the URL but same
    >message. Not a a good approach
    >>

    >*/jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk <mailto:jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk>/* wrote:
    >>

    >Hi,
    >>

    >Hm interesting scenarioPlease see my comments below.
    >>

    >Thanks,
    >>

    >Jaliya
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >Message
    >From: IV
    >To: Benjamin Schmeling ; sandesha-dev (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:50 PM
    >Subject: Re: ws and reliability
    >>
    >>

    >Hi,
    >i have a project that requires the use of either a message
    >broker or web
    >services.
    >HINT: Intend to transfer all daily sales of burger

    king stores to
    >headquarter. this implies an average of 2000 sto

    res connect
    >to headquarter
    >with 2hours window of transaction. also the possibility of
    >burger-king
    >headquarter to broadcast price changes to all stores. With
    >message brokers
    >this is possible like JMS or propriatory ones

    using publishing
    >and
    >subscription.
    >Have made studies on WS-RM, WS-Security, WS-Conversation,
    >WS-Callback, and
    >WS-Policy and thought web services with their

    interop they
    >are better
    >than JMS and other MM. I have had a look on Sandesha as
    >regards to WS-RM.
    >It was quite interesting. My qeuestions after reading this
    >mail of using
    >sequences in talking to three WS:
    >1. Having the same messages for web service A, B, and C is
    >there a means
    >to braodcast the messages without any interation in
    >application level but
    >by sim ply listing the endpoints?
    >>

    >Sandesha does not have a message broadcasting

    machanism at the
    >transport
    >level and it is not a requirement of the WS-RM

    specs. For this
    >functionality you have to use some mediation

    service. Apache
    >Synapse will
    >do this soon :)
    >>

    >2. Has Sandesha some implementations of load

    balance? BEA uses
    >Buffers.
    >Say 2000 stores all talk simultaneously to one WS.
    >>

    >Sandesha does not have a built in load balancing mechanism.
    >But it may be
    >able to handle the load as long as Servlet

    container and Axis
    >is handling
    >the load.
    >>

    >3. Has Sandesha in built tools for monitoring the flow of
    >information at
    >transport level or do i have define my handlers for that?
    >>

    >You can add handler to both request and response flows to
    >monitor the
    >message flow.
    >>

    >4. What about WS-Conversation and Callback?
    >Implementation of WS-SecCon is still not complete
    >>

    >thanks
    >>
    >>

    >Benjamin Schmeling wrote:
    >Hi,
    >>

    >imagine the scenario, described in the reliable messaging
    >specification.
    >Now lets assume the webservices are all oneway and

    the second
    >message
    >goes to a third endpoint. I know the specification

    suppor ts
    >only two
    >endpoints, but is there a possibility to do the following:
    >>

    >1.) call webservice A (at http:/abc.org)
    >2.) call webservice B (at http:/cde.org)
    >3.) call webservice C (at http:/abc.org)
    >>

    >I could do this with 3 separate sequences. At

    every end of one
    >sequence
    >endSequence() is called in Sandesha. Can I make

    the conclusion
    >that
    >after calling endSequence() the message to all

    webservices in the
    >sequence are already successfully delivered?
    >>

    >For example:
    >new SandeshaContext()
    >call webservice A (at http:/abc.org)
    >endSequence()
    >// /message to A has been delivered already at

    this point of
    >code?/
    >new SandeshaContext()
    >call webservice B (at http:/cde.org)
    >
    >
    >
    >>

    >Thanks,
    >>

    >Benjamin
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >


    >To unsubscribe, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >


    >Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million

    songs. Try it
    >free.
    >>

    >


    >To unsubscribe, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >SUMELNG IV
    >UNIVERSITY F DUISBURG-ESSN
    >DEPARTMENT F CMPUTER SCIENCE AND
    >CMMUNICATIN ENGINEERING
    >SCHEMKESWEG 41
    >47057 DUISBURG
    >Germany
    >HME.: 00492033948762
    >MBILE.00491797751042
    >EMAIL.: spartan2iv (AT) yahoo (DOT) com <mailto:spartan2iv (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
    >>

    >


    >Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.

    Try it free.
    >>

    >

    <http://pa.yahoo.com/**http:/
    /music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>
    >>

    >
    >

    To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    --
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
  • No.1 | | 12268 bytes | |

    IV

    There is a specification called WS-Eventing which supports the broadcast. If
    you want the same message to go to multiple endpoints reliably, then you
    need to compose WS-Eventing and WS-ReliableMessaging. We are planning to add
    WS-Eventing support as a broker to Apache Synapse, so you could send one
    message to the Synapse broker and have it reliably delivered to multiple
    endpoints.

    Would that work?

    As regards clustering, there is no built in support, but there is no reason
    that Axis2 cannot be used on a clustered application server or runtime.

    Paul

    PS If you want more information about how my company is creating a solution
    to this problem send me an email to paul (AT) wso2 (DOT) com.

    12/2/05, IV <spartan2iv (AT) yahoo (DOT) comwrote:

    Hi,
    i have had a look several times on RM I thing there is no way to provide
    reliability for many one message directed to many ws using one single
    sequence. Sequence have to be tracked and these wc will need individual
    tracking since the reponse time might be different However Sandesha could
    provide possiblities to be instructed that a message goes to several WS, it
    then generate using any alogorith different sequences for every WS. this
    frees the application from interetion. The application might then do some
    other job while sandesha takes care of this interation keeping the spec
    intakt
    Any opinion?
    >
    >
    >

    *"Dittmann, Werner" <werner.dittmann (AT) siemens (DOT) com>* wrote:

    Hi,

    just jumping in here with a question: isn't
    Benajmin's requirements more related to a transaction
    mana ger than to Reliable Message? Transactions
    management would imply to have reliable messages (and
    probably a sequence) plus the guarantee that all
    services have their tasks done (all or nothing
    principle).

    You may have a look at

    IMH the specs defined there address Ben's problem.

    Regards,
    Werner

    Nachricht
    Von: jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk [mailto:jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk]
    Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 03:50
    An: Benjamin Schmeling
    Cc: sandesha-dev (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    Betreff: Re: ws and reliability

    Hi,

    WS-RM guarantees delivery of messages from one endpoint to
    the other. Mainly
    between endpoint managers. So there is no way that we can put
    messages going
    to different endpoints into a single sequence. This is not
    what WS-RM for
    & gt; and rather is useful when we have many massages to the same endpoint

    Thanks,

    Jaliya

    Message
    From: "Benjamin Schmeling"
    Cc:
    Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:39 PM
    Subject: Re: ws and reliability
    --
    Hi,
    concerning different endpoint it is not possible to put them in one
    sequence. But what is when you have calls on different web
    services on one
    maschine. Is it possible to put them all in one sequence
    and how is it
    done in sandesha? I tried it out but got an ERRR: MESSAGE
    IS NULL IN
    ResponseSeqHash.

    Thanks,

    Benjamin
    >
    >Hi,
    >IMH it is not a feature that should be covered by WS-RM,

    it should be a
    >feature of the underlying SAP engine.
    >For RM all these messages are different sequence if they

    are going to
    >different endpoints. So if we need to send one message to

    2000 stores
    >then it will be a 2000 sequence and lot of additional

    messages. We can
    >use RM but there is are additional overhead involve in it.

    However it the
    >scenario is such that we need to send 2000 messages to

    same recipient,
    >then RM is for that and will serve well.
    >Thanks,
    >Jaliya
    >>

    >Message
    >*From:* IV
    >*To:* jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk
    >*Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2005 3:04 AM
    >*Subject:* Re: ws and reliability
    >>

    &g t; >Hi,
    >Thx for the response. However i think the Spec of WS-RM had to
    >think about reliably talking to many WS with same

    message without
    >any interation of sequences. I tried to loop 2000

    times for 2000
    >stores and for each store i had just to change the URL but same
    >message. Not a a good approach
    >>

    >*/jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk /* wrote:
    >>

    >Hi,
    >>

    >Hm interesting scenarioPlease see my comments below.
    >>

    >Thanks,
    >>

    >Jaliya
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >Message
    >From: IV
    >To: Benjamin Schmeling ; sandesha-dev (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:50 PM
    >Subj ect: Re: ws and reliability
    >>
    >>

    >Hi,
    >i have a project that requires the use of either a message
    >broker or web
    >services.
    >HINT: Intend to transfer all daily sales of burger

    king stores to
    >headquarter. this implies an average of 2000 sto

    res connect
    >to headquarter
    >with 2hours window of transaction. also the possibility of
    >burger-king
    >headquarter to broadcast price changes to all stores. With
    >message brokers
    >this is possible like JMS or propriatory ones

    using publishing
    >and
    >subscription.
    >Have made studies on WS-RM, WS-Security, WS-Conversation,
    >WS-Callback, and
    >WS-Policy and thought web services with their

    interop they
    are better
    >than JMS and other MM. I have had a look on Sandesha as
    >regards to WS-RM.
    >It was quite interesting. My qeuestions after reading this
    >mail of using
    >sequences in talking to three WS:
    >1. Having the same messages for web service A, B, and C is
    >there a means
    >to braodcast the messages without any interation in
    >application level but
    >by sim ply listing the endpoints?
    >>

    >Sandesha does not have a message broadcasting

    machanism at the
    >transport
    >level and it is not a requirement of the WS-RM

    specs. For this
    >functionality you have to use some mediation

    service. Apache
    >Synapse will
    >do this soon :)
    >>

    >2. Has Sandesha some implementations of loa d

    balance? BEA uses
    >Buffers.
    >Say 2000 stores all talk simultaneously to one WS.
    >>

    >Sandesha does not have a built in load balancing mechanism.
    >But it may be
    >able to handle the load as long as Servlet

    container and Axis
    >is handling
    >the load.
    >>

    >3. Has Sandesha in built tools for monitoring the flow of
    >information at
    >transport level or do i have define my handlers for that?
    >>

    >You can add handler to both request and response flows to
    >monitor the
    >message flow.
    >>

    >4. What about WS-Conversation and Callback?
    >Implementation of WS-SecCon is still not complete
    >>

    >thanks
    >>
    >>

    >Benjamin Sc hmeling wrote:
    >Hi,
    >>

    >imagine the scenario, described in the reliable messaging
    >specification.
    >Now lets assume the webservices are all oneway and

    the second
    >message
    >goes to a third endpoint. I know the specification

    suppor ts
    >only two
    >endpoints, but is there a possibility to do the following:
    >>

    >1.) call webservice A (at http:/abc.org)
    >2.) call webservice B (at http:/cde.org)
    >3.) call webservice C (at http:/abc.org)
    >>

    >I could do this with 3 separate sequences. At

    every end of one
    >sequence
    >endSequence() is called in Sandesha. Can I make

    the conclusion
    >that
    >after calling endSequence() the message to all

    webservices in the
    & gt;sequence are already successfully delivered?
    >>

    >For example:
    >new SandeshaContext()
    >call webservice A (at http:/abc.org)
    >endSequence()
    >// /message to A has been delivered already at

    this point of
    >code?/
    >new SandeshaContext()
    >call webservice B (at http:/cde.org)
    >
    >
    >
    >>

    >Thanks,
    >>

    >Benjamin
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>


    >To unsubscribe, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>



    >Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million

    songs. Try it
    >free.
    >>
    >>


    >To unsubscribe, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >SUMELNG IV
    >UNIVERSITY F DUISBURG-ESSN
    >DEPARTMENT F CMPUTER SCIENCE AND
    >CMMUNICATIN ENGINEERING
    >SCHEMKESWEG 41
    >47057 DUISBURG
    >Germany
    >HME.: 00492033948762
    >MBILE.00491797751042
    >EMAIL.: spartan2iv@yah oo.com
    >>
    >>



    >Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.

    Try it free.
    >>
    >>

    /music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>
    >>

    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >
    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail: sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >
    >
    >
    >

    SUMELNG IV
    UNIVERSITY F DUISBURG-ESSN
    DEPARTMENT F CMPUTER SCIENCE AND
    CMMUNICATIN ENGINEERING
    SCHEMKESWEG 41
    47057 DUISBURG
    Germany
    HME.: 00492033948762
    MBILE.00491797751042
    EMAIL.: spartan2iv (AT) yahoo (DOT) com

    *Yahoo! Personals*
    Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
    Lots of someones, actually. Try Yahoo! Personals<*http://personals.yahoo.com+%0D%0A>
    --
  • No.2 | | 13090 bytes | |

    Hi Paul,
    Interesting I have done some similar work with one of the in house
    developped broker at Indiana University. Infact did a reliable broker
    as exactly as you said, where the brocker itself can deliver the
    messages reliably to the consumers by switching on an configuration.
    So this could be done beyond any doubt. (I am afraid the brocker that
    i am talking about doesnot have a release for the particular case
    though. )
    Is there a effort for Axis2 based notification. I might be able to
    give some hand if you are planning to develop a brokered
    Notification/Eventing on top of Axis2.

    Thanks
    Chathura

    12/12/05, Paul Fremantle <pzfreo (AT) gmail (DOT) comwrote:
    IV

    There is a specification called WS-Eventing which supports the broadcast. If
    you want the same message to go to multiple endpoints reliably, then you
    need to compose WS-Eventing and WS-ReliableMessaging. We are planning to add
    WS-Eventing support as a broker to Apache Synapse, so you could send one
    message to the Synapse broker and have it reliably delivered to multiple
    endpoints.

    Would that work?

    As regards clustering, there is no built in support, but there is no reason
    that Axis2 cannot be used on a clustered application server or runtime.

    Paul

    PS If you want more information about how my company is creating a solution
    to this problem send me an email to paul (AT) wso2 (DOT) com.
    --
    12/2/05, IV <spartan2iv (AT) yahoo (DOT) comwrote:
    --
    Hi,
    i have had a look several times on RM I thing there is no way to provide
    reliability for many one message directed to many ws using one single
    sequence. Sequence have to be tracked and these wc will need individual
    tracking since the reponse time might be different However Sandesha could
    provide possiblities to be instructed that a message goes to several WS, it
    then generate using any alogorith different sequences for every WS. this
    frees the application from interetion. The application might then do some
    other job while sandesha takes care of this interation keeping the spec
    intakt
    Any opinion?
    >
    >
    >

    "Dittmann, Werner" < werner.dittmann (AT) siemens (DOT) comwrote:
    Hi,

    just jumping in here with a question: isn't
    Benajmin's requirements more related to a transaction
    mana ger than to Reliable Message? Transactions
    management would imply to have reliable messages (and
    probably a sequence) plus the guarantee that all
    services have their tasks done (all or nothing
    principle).

    You may have a look at
    --

    IMH the specs defined there address Ben's problem.

    Regards,
    Werner

    Nachricht
    Von: jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk [mailto:jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk]
    Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Dezember 2005 03:50
    An: Benjamin Schmeling
    Cc: sandesha-dev (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    Betreff: Re: ws and reliability

    Hi,

    WS-RM guarantees delivery of messages from one endpoint to
    the other. Mainly
    between endpoint managers. So there is no way that we can put
    messages going
    to different endpoints into a single sequence. This is not
    what WS-RM for
    & gt; and rather is useful when we have many massages to the same endpoint

    Thanks,

    Jaliya

    Message
    From: "Benjamin Schmeling"

    Cc:
    Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 4:39 PM
    Subject: Re: ws and reliability
    --
    Hi,
    concerning different endpoint it is not possible to put them in one
    sequence. But what is when you have calls on different web
    services on one
    maschine. Is it possible to put them all in one sequence
    and how is it
    done in sandesha? I tried it out but got an ERRR: MESSAGE
    IS NULL IN
    ResponseSeqHash.

    Thanks,

    Benjamin
    >
    >Hi,
    >IMH it is not a feature that should be covered by WS-RM,

    it should be a
    >feature of the underlying SAP engine.
    >For RM all these messages are different sequence if they

    are going to
    >different endpoints. So if we need to send one message to

    2000 stores
    >then it will be a 2000 sequence and lot of additional

    messages. We can
    >use RM but there is are additional overhead involve in it.

    However it the
    >scenario is such that we need to send 2000 messages to

    same recipient,
    >then RM is for that and will serve well.
    >Thanks,
    >Jaliya
    >>

    >Message
    >*From:* IV
    >*To:* jaliya (AT) opensource (DOT) lk
    >*Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2005 3:04 AM
    >*Subject:* Re: ws and reliability
    >>

    &g t; >Hi,
    >Thx for the response. However i think the Spec of WS-RM had to
    >think about reliably talking to many WS with same

    message without
    >any interation of sequences. I tried to loop 2000

    times for 2000
    >stores and for each store i had just to change the URL but same
    >message. Not a a good approach
    >>

    >*/jaliya@ opensource.lk /* wrote:
    >>

    >Hi,
    >>

    >Hm interesting scenarioPlease see my comments below.
    >>

    >Thanks,
    >>

    >Jaliya
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >Message
    >From: IV
    >To: Benjamin Schmeling ; sandesha-dev (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:50 PM
    >
    >Subj ect: Re: ws and reliability
    >>
    >>

    >Hi,
    >i have a project that requires the use of either a message
    >broker or web
    >services.
    >HINT: Intend to transfer all daily sales of burger

    king stores to
    >headquarter. this implies an average of 2000 sto

    res connect
    >to headquarter
    >with 2hours window of transaction. also the possibility of
    >burger-king
    >headquarter to broadcast price changes to all stores. With
    >message brokers
    >this is possible like JMS or propriatory ones

    using publishing
    >and
    >subscription.
    >Have made studies on WS-RM, WS-Security, WS-Conversation,
    >WS-Callback, and
    >WS-Policy and thought web services with their

    interop they
    are better
    >than JMS and other MM. I have had a look on Sandesha as
    >regards to WS-RM.
    >It was quite interesting. My qeuestions after reading this
    >mail of using
    >sequences in talking to three WS:
    >1. Having the same messages for web service A, B, and C is
    >there a means
    >to braodcast the messages without any interation in
    >application level but
    >by sim ply listing the endpoints?
    >>

    >Sandesha does not have a message broadcasting

    machanism at the
    >transport
    >level and it is not a requirement of the WS-RM

    specs. For this
    >functionality you have to use some mediation

    service. Apache
    >Synapse will
    >do this soon :)
    >>

    >2. Has Sandesha some implementations of loa d

    balance? BEA uses
    >Buffers.
    >Say 2000 stores all talk simultaneously to one WS.
    >>

    >Sandesha does not have a built in load balancing mechanism.
    >But it may be
    >able to handle the load as long as Servlet

    container and Axis
    >is handling
    >the load.
    >>

    >3. Has Sandesha in built tools for monitoring the flow of
    >information at
    >transport level or do i have define my handlers for that?
    >>

    >You can add handler to both request and response flows to
    >monitor the
    >message flow.
    >>

    >4. What about WS-Conversation and Callback?
    >Implementation of WS-SecCon is still not complete
    >>

    >thanks
    >>
    >>

    >Benjamin Sc hmeling wrote:
    >Hi,
    >>

    >imagine the scenario, described in the reliable messaging
    >specification.
    >Now lets assume the webservices are all oneway and

    the second
    >message
    >goes to a third endpoint. I know the specification

    suppor ts
    >only two
    >endpoints, but is there a possibility to do the following:
    >>

    >1.) call webservice A (at http:/abc.org)
    >2.) call webservice B (at http:/cde.org)
    >3.) call webservice C (at http:/abc.org)
    >>

    >I could do this with 3 separate sequences. At

    every end of one
    >sequence
    >endSequence() is called in Sandesha. Can I make

    the conclusion
    >that
    >after calling endSequence() the message to all

    webservices in the
    & gt;sequence are already successfully delivered?
    >
    >>

    >For example:
    >new SandeshaContext()
    >call webservice A (at http:/abc.org)
    >endSequence()
    >// /message to A has been delivered already at

    this point of
    >code?/
    >new SandeshaContext()
    >call webservice B (at http:/cde.org)
    >
    >
    >
    >>

    >Thanks,
    >>

    >Benjamin
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >


    >To unsubscribe, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >



    >Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million

    songs. Try it
    >free.
    >>
    >>

    >


    >To unsubscribe, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >For additional commands, e-mail:

    sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >SUMELNG IV
    >UNIVERSITY F DUISBURG-ESSN
    >DEPARTMENT F CMPUTER SCIENCE AND
    >CMMUNICATIN ENGINEERING
    >SCHEMKESWEG 41
    >47057 DUISBURG
    >Germany
    >HME.: 00492033948762
    >MBILE.00491797751042
    >EMAIL.: spartan2iv@yah oo.com
    >>
    >>

    >



    >Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.

    Try it free.
    >>
    >>

    /music.yahoo.com/unlimited/>
    >>

    >
    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail:
    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail:
    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >
    >
    >
    >


    To unsubscribe, e-mail:
    sandesha-dev-unsubscribe (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: sandesha-dev-help (AT) ws (DOT) apache.org
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

    SUMELNG IV
    UNIVERSITY F DUISBURG-ESSN
    DEPARTMENT F CMPUTER SCIENCE AND
    CMMUNICATIN ENGINEERING
    SCHEMKESWEG 41
    47057 DUISBURG
    Germany
    HME.: 00492033948762
    MBILE.00491797751042
    EMAIL.: spartan2iv (AT) yahoo (DOT) com

    Yahoo! Personals
    Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
    Lots of someones, actually. Try Yahoo! Personals
    >
    >
    >
    >

Re: AW: Oneway ws and reliability


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 5 + 4 =
QUESTION ON "Apache"

EMSDN.COM