I want to provide the user with an editor like
Is it best to use a JavaScript based editor?
Are there some "favorites" out there or is the FCKeditor about as good
as they get?
Todd

Nov 26, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
I want to provide the user with an editor like
Is it best to use a JavaScript based editor?
Are there some "favorites" out there or is the FCKeditor about as
good as they get?
Todd

Joe -
Thank you. I like how TinyMCE integrates.

Todd
Joe Wollard wrote:
Nov 26, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Todd Cary wrote:

>I want to provide the user with an editor like
>>
>
>>
>Is it best to use a JavaScript based editor?
>>
>Are there some "favorites" out there or is the FCKeditor about as
>good as they get?
>>
>Todd
>>
>--
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>

I don't know if one is better than the next, but I've used TinyMCE in
the past and it has served me well.
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/

I don't know about TinyMCE - about to look at it, but I have found FCKeditor
very slow.
HTH

26/11/05, Todd Cary <todd (AT) aristesoftware (DOT) comwrote:

Joe -

Thank you. I like how TinyMCE integrates.

Todd
Joe Wollard wrote:
Nov 26, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
>
>I want to provide the user with an editor like
>>
>
>>
>Is it best to use a JavaScript based editor?
>>
>Are there some "favorites" out there or is the FCKeditor about as
>good as they get?
>>
>Todd
>>
>--
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>
I don't know if one is better than the next, but I've used TinyMCE in
the past and it has served me well.
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/

I agree that FCKEditor is kinda slow as well. of my problems is that it
doesn't provide XHTML valid code. But it's a very robust free version. . But
it does do some pretty amazing things like allow you to copy and paste from
a website directly into the editor, or browse the server etc.

*

Check out: http://www.htmlarea.com/ [http://www.htmlarea.com/] for a large
list of free and paid for editors.

Message

From: Tom Chubb <tomchubb (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

To: Todd Cary <todd (AT) aristesoftware (DOT) com>

Cc: php-general (AT) lists (DOT) php.net

Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:44:33 +0000

Subject: Re: [PHP] Web based editor

I don't know about TinyMCE - about to look at it, but I have found

FCKeditor

very slow.

HTH

26/11/05, Todd Cary <todd (AT) aristesoftware (DOT) comwrote:

Joe -

Thank you. *I like how TinyMCE integrates.

Todd

Joe Wollard wrote:

Nov 26, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Todd Cary wrote:


>I want to provide the user with an editor like

>>


>>

>Is it best to use a JavaScript based editor?

>>

>Are there some "favorites" out there or is the FCKeditor about as

>good as they get?

>>

>Todd

>>

>--

>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)

>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

>>

I don't know if one is better than the next, but I've used TinyMCE

in

the past and it has served me well.

http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/

Tom -
I noticed that too:

Todd

Tom Chubb wrote:
I don't know about TinyMCE - about to look at it, but I have found FCKeditor
very slow.
HTH

26/11/05, Todd Cary <todd (AT) aristesoftware (DOT) comwrote:

>>Joe -
>>
>>Thank you. I like how TinyMCE integrates.
>>
>>Todd
>>Joe Wollard wrote:
>>
Nov 26, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Todd Cary wrote:

I want to provide the user with an editor like

Is it best to use a JavaScript based editor?

Are there some "favorites" out there or is the FCKeditor about as
good as they get?

Todd

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

I don't know if one is better than the next, but I've used TinyMCE in
the past and it has served me well.
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/
>>

>>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>

Tom -
I noticed that too:

Todd

Tom Chubb wrote:
I don't know about TinyMCE - about to look at it, but I have found FCKeditor
very slow.
HTH

26/11/05, Todd Cary <todd (AT) aristesoftware (DOT) comwrote:

>>Joe -
>>
>>Thank you. I like how TinyMCE integrates.
>>
>>Todd
>>Joe Wollard wrote:
>>
Nov 26, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Todd Cary wrote:

I want to provide the user with an editor like

Is it best to use a JavaScript based editor?

Are there some "favorites" out there or is the FCKeditor about as
good as they get?

Todd

PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

I don't know if one is better than the next, but I've used TinyMCE in
the past and it has served me well.
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/
>>

>>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>

Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:52:42PM -0800, Mark Steudel wrote:

I agree that FCKEditor is kinda slow as well. of my problems is that it
doesn't provide XHTML valid code. But it's a very robust free version. . But
it does do some pretty amazing things like allow you to copy and paste from
a website directly into the editor, or browse the server etc.

I wouldn't expect any wysiwyg editor to comply to any standard.

Curt.

Sun, 2005-11-27 at 14:54 -0800, Curt Zirzow wrote:
I wouldn't expect any wysiwyg editor to comply to any standard.

Tiny MCE seems to make an attempt at XHTML 1.0:

Having a copy of the 1216 page XHTML Black Book here on my desk makes me
think their XHTML validation list is a bit incomplete, but it does look
like they have the most common elements in there.

I've tried lots of javascript wysiwyg editors. Tiny MCE is my pick.
Fast and very customizable. The cleanup functionality works great with
non-techies who like to draft stuff in MS Word first.

*
Here's one that I haven't used that claims it does XHTML 1.1 strict . It's
not free though

*

http://xstandard.com/

Message

From: Curt Zirzow <czirzow (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

To: php-general (AT) lists (DOT) php.net

Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:54:47 -0800

Subject: Re: [PHP] Web based editor

Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:52:42PM -0800, Mark Steudel wrote:

I agree that FCKEditor is kinda slow as well. of my problems is

that it

doesn't provide XHTML valid code. But it's a very robust free

version. . But

it does do some pretty amazing things like allow you to copy and

paste from

a website directly into the editor, or browse the server etc.

I wouldn't expect any wysiwyg editor to comply to any standard.

Curt.

Wow cool, looks nice. company does a lot of CMS stuff and I'm not a
great fan of FCKeditor so far and am always on the look out for something
better.

Message

From: Greg Donald <destiney (AT) destiney (DOT) com>

To: php-general (AT) lists (DOT) php.net

Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:16:47 -0600

Subject: Re: [PHP] Web based editor

Sun, 2005-11-27 at 14:54 -0800, Curt Zirzow wrote:

I wouldn't expect any wysiwyg editor to comply to any standard.

Tiny MCE seems to make an attempt at XHTML 1.0:

Having a copy of the 1216 page XHTML Black Book here on my desk makes

me

think their XHTML validation list is a bit incomplete, but it does look

like they have the most common elements in there.

I've tried lots of javascript wysiwyg editors. *Tiny MCE is my pick.

Fast and very customizable. *The cleanup functionality works great with

non-techies who like to draft stuff in MS Word first.

Greg Donald wrote:

I've tried lots of javascript wysiwyg editors. Tiny MCE is my pick.
Fast and very customizable. The cleanup functionality works great with
non-techies who like to draft stuff in MS Word first.

We have ended up with it as the html option for bitweaver and it seems
to behave itself nicely.