Java

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Results ( Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5)

    0 answers - 2475 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    It was a joke.
    Message
    From: Tatu Saloranta [mailto:cowtowncoder (AT) yahoo (DOT) com]
    Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 11:55 AM
    To: java-dev (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
    Subject: RE: Results (Re: Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5)
    Robert Engels <rengels (AT) ix (DOT) netcom.comwrote:
    I think you should port Lucene to MS-DS
    If your app can't move beyond MS-DS, then you stick with version 1.9
    (or 2.0 in this case).
    If you can't innovate and move forward, you die.
    Java has a GREAT history of supporting prior versions. At some point
    though you need to be able to move forward since developers may not be
    trained in the "legacy" environment.
    While this is true, I thinks that comparisons of Lucene to, say, MS-DS are
    at best a knee-jerk comments, or otherwise imply some lack of perspective
    and common sense (probably former though).
    Lucene has moved away from JDK 1.1 support, and at this point 1.4 is
    probably the baseline. This has happened over time, as platform has
    advanced. And it's bit curious as to what the current mad rush regarding
    migration is -- beyond the convenience and syntactic sugar, only the
    concurrency package seems like a tempting immediate reason?
    Now, I think Doug had best points regarding inertia that low-level libraries
    and components should consider. Apps are first to move to newest versions;
    top-level libraries then, and finally fundamental components and engines. I
    would think Lucene falls into this category: it has few dependencies of its
    own, but has tons of downstream dependencies.
    I don't know if this has suggested yet, but how about switching to 1.5, when
    Sun declares 1.6 to be the official stable JDK (ie. when it comes out of its
    beta status)?
    Anyway, it obviously comes down to the active committers to decide the
    time/version for the cut-off.
    But I hope it can be a practical decision made with cool minds.
    -+ Tatu +-
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help (AT) lucene (DOT) apache.org

Re: Results ( Survey: Lucene and Java 1.4 vs. 1.5)


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 7 + 6 =
QUESTION ON "Java"

EMSDN.COM