Networking

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • better solution?

    6 answers - 653 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi list, i'm new in spamassassin, I have all the system configured ( I
    think )
    but I have a question, when a spam message arrive the spamassassin mark it
    as the spam, then the message going to my mailbox
    My question it's:
    I want that some of this spams, instead of going to the user's INBX folder,
    go to their SPAM folder.
    Which the better solution to achieve this?
    and what's the name of the program?
    I have a debian sarge, postfix, spamassassin 3.0.3
    thanks jea
    LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
    Llamadas a fijos y desde 1 por minuto.
    http://es.voice.yahoo.com
  • No.1 | | 786 bytes | |

    jeabacula (AT) yahoo (DOT) es schrieb:
    Hi list, i'm new in spamassassin, I have all the system configured ( I
    think )
    but I have a question, when a spam message arrive the spamassassin mark it
    as the spam, then the message going to my mailbox

    My question it's:
    I want that some of this spams, instead of going to the user's INBX folder,
    go to their SPAM folder.
    Which the better solution to achieve this?
    and what's the name of the program?

    procmail, (alternative: maildrop (if you use courier), or sieve iirc
    (cyrus))

    I have a debian sarge, postfix, spamassassin 3.0.3

    btw: i would suggest to upgrade to a newer SA (backports or
    testing,requires new perl too ).

    thanks jea

    hth
    MH
  • No.2 | | 366 bytes | |

    Matthias Haegele wrote:
    jeabacula (AT) yahoo (DOT) es schrieb:

    procmail, (alternative: maildrop (if you use courier), or sieve iirc
    (cyrus))

    if he has an mda that supports it (like cyrus) "plus addressing" is
    an option provided the content filter he's using supports it (like amavis)

    Mike Woods
    Systems Administrator
  • No.3 | | 1541 bytes | |

    30-okt-2006, at 10:03, Matthias Haegele wrote:

    jeabacula (AT) yahoo (DOT) es schrieb:
    >Hi list, i'm new in spamassassin, I have all the system configured
    >( I
    >think )
    >but I have a question, when a spam message arrive the spamassassin
    >mark it
    >as the spam, then the message going to my mailbox
    >My question it's:
    >I want that some of this spams, instead of going to the user's
    >INBX folder,
    >go to their SPAM folder.
    >Which the better solution to achieve this?
    >and what's the name of the program?
    >

    procmail, (alternative: maildrop (if you use courier), or sieve
    iirc (cyrus))
    >
    >I have a debian sarge, postfix, spamassassin 3.0.3
    >

    btw: i would suggest to upgrade to a newer SA (backports or
    testing,requires new perl too ).

    Correction: the 3.1.4 version of SA in Debian volatile (http://
    )
    does not require a new version of perl:

    leander:~# aptitude show spamassassin
    Package: spamassassin
    State: installed
    Automatically installed: no
    Version: 3.1.4-0volatile1
    Priority: optional
    Section: mail
    Maintainer: Duncan Findlay <duncf (AT) debian (DOT) org>
    Uncompressed Size: 3068k
    Depends: perl (>= 5.6.0-16), libhtml-parser-perl (>= 3.31), libdigest-
    sha1-perl, libsocket6-perl, libarchive-tar-perl, libwww-perl

    So the default perl 5.8 in Sarge will do fine

    Leander
  • No.4 | | 1907 bytes | |

    Leander Koornneef schrieb:

    30-okt-2006, at 10:03, Matthias Haegele wrote:

    >jeabacula (AT) yahoo (DOT) es schrieb:

    Hi list, i'm new in spamassassin, I have all the system configured ( I
    think )
    but I have a question, when a spam message arrive the spamassassin
    mark it
    as the spam, then the message going to my mailbox
    My question it's:
    I want that some of this spams, instead of going to the user's INBX
    folder,
    go to their SPAM folder.
    Which the better solution to achieve this?
    and what's the name of the program?
    >>

    >procmail, (alternative: maildrop (if you use courier), or sieve iirc
    >(cyrus))
    >>

    I have a debian sarge, postfix, spamassassin 3.0.3
    >>

    >btw: i would suggest to upgrade to a newer SA (backports or
    >testing,requires new perl too ).


    Correction: the 3.1.4 version of SA in Debian volatile
    ()
    does not require a new version of perl:

    leander:~# aptitude show spamassassin
    Package: spamassassin
    State: installed
    Automatically installed: no
    Version: 3.1.4-0volatile1
    Priority: optional
    Section: mail
    Maintainer: Duncan Findlay <duncf (AT) debian (DOT) org>
    Uncompressed Size: 3068k
    Depends: perl (>= 5.6.0-16), libhtml-parser-perl (>= 3.31),
    libdigest-sha1-perl, libsocket6-perl, libarchive-tar-perl, libwww-perl

    So the default perl 5.8 in Sarge will do fine

    Thx, for it. So the chance is greater it is "painless" for the P ;-).

    @jea perhaps you will provide us with more "details"?
    (What additional sw do you use, pop3/imap-server?, etc, (dpkg -l could
    help)).

    Leander

    Greetings
    MH
  • No.5 | | 949 bytes | |

    Well, some document to learn how I do the configuration for procmail or
    maildrop? I mean, postfix and procmail or maildrop
    This solution it's by server side?

    thanks

    jea

    Message
    From: "Mike Woods" <mike (AT) arishi (DOT) com>
    To: <users (AT) spamassassin (DOT) apache.org>
    Sent: Monday, 30, 2006 10:26 AM
    Subject: Re: better solution?

    Matthias Haegele wrote:
    >jeabacula (AT) yahoo (DOT) es schrieb:
    >>

    >procmail, (alternative: maildrop (if you use courier), or sieve iirc

    (cyrus))

    if he has an mda that supports it (like cyrus) "plus addressing" is
    an option provided the content filter he's using supports it (like amavis)

    Mike Woods
    Systems Administrator

    LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
    Llamadas a fijos y desde 1 por minuto.
    http://es.voice.yahoo.com
  • No.6 | | 1346 bytes | |

    From: <jeabacula (AT) yahoo (DOT) es>

    Hi list, i'm new in spamassassin, I have all the system configured ( I
    think )
    but I have a question, when a spam message arrive the spamassassin mark it
    as the spam, then the message going to my mailbox

    My question it's:
    I want that some of this spams, instead of going to the user's INBX folder,
    go to their SPAM folder.
    Which the better solution to achieve this?
    and what's the name of the program?

    I have a debian sarge, postfix, spamassassin 3.0.3

    This is best done in the tool that speaks to SpamAssassin. And there
    is a nice trick you can pull to make it possible to sort on a finer
    basis if the tool is smart enough.

    rewrite_header Subject SPAM _SCRE(00)_ **

    That gives subjects with a three digit, decimal point, digit format
    for the score. It makes it really easy to sort out low scoring spams
    for further inspection or treatment in the spam folder. I have spamc
    called by procmail here. And I simply feed it all to dovecot with the
    markup. Then I use Express to sort the incoming mail into about
    40 active folders, one of which is "spam". Sorting by subject then
    allows easy scans for mismarked ham messages or for messages I want to
    feed to salearn.

    {^_^} Joanne

Re: better solution?


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 9 + 9 =
QUESTION ON "Networking"

EMSDN.COM