Linux Security

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • SUSE Security Announcement: MozillaFirefox (SUSE-SA:2007:019)

    0 answers - 11576 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
    Hash: SHA1
    SUSE Security Announcement
    Package: MozillaFirefox,seamonkey
    Announcement ID: SUSE-SA:2007:019
    Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:00:00 +0000
    Affected Products: SUSE LINUX 9.3
    SUSE LINUX 10.0
    SUSE LINUX 10.1
    openSUSE 10.2
    Novell Linux Desktop 9
    SUSE SLED 10
    SUSE SLES 10
    Vulnerability Type: remote code execution
    Severity (1-10): 6
    SUSE Default Package: yes
    Cross-References: CVE-2006-6077, CVE-2007-0008, CVE-2007-0009
    CVE-2007-0775, CVE-2007-0776, CVE-2007-0777
    CVE-2007-0778, CVE-2007-0779, CVE-2007-0780
    CVE-2007-0800, CVE-2007-0981, CVE-2007-0994
    CVE-2007-0995, CVE-2007-0996, CVE-2007-1092
    MFSA 2006-72, MFSA 2007-01, MFSA 2007-02
    MFSA 2007-03, MFSA 2007-04, MFSA 2007-05
    MFSA 2007-06, MFSA 2007-08, MFSA 2007-09
    Content of This Advisory:
    1) Security Vulnerability Resolved:
    Mozilla Firefox security release 1.5.0.10 / 2.0.0.2
    Problem Description
    2) Solution or Work-Around
    3) Special Instructions and Notes
    4) Package Location and Checksums
    5) Pending Vulnerabilities, Solutions, and Work-Arounds:
    See SUSE Security Summary Report.
    6) Authenticity Verification and Additional Information
    1) Problem Description and Brief Discussion
    The Mozilla Firefox web browser was updated to security update version
    1.5.0.10 on older products and Mozilla Firefox to version 2.0.0.2 on
    openSUSE 10.2 to fix various security issues.
    Updates for the Mozilla seamonkey suite before 10.2, Mozilla Suite
    and Mozilla Thunderbird are still pending.
    Full details can be found on:
    - MFSA 2007-01: As part of the Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 update
    releases several bugs were fixed to improve the stability of the
    browser. Some of these were crashes that showed evidence of memory
    corruption and we presume that with enough effort at least some of
    these could be exploited to run arbitrary code. These fixes affected
    the layout engine (CVE-2007-0775), SVG renderer (CVE-2007-0776)
    and javascript engine (CVE-2007-0777).
    - MFSA 2007-02: Various enhancements were done to make XSS exploits
    against websites less effective. These included fixes for invalid
    trailing characters (CVE-2007-0995), child frame character set
    inheritance (CVE-2007-0996), password form injection (CVE-2006-6077),
    and the Adobe Reader universal XSS problem.
    - MFSA 2007-03/CVE-2007-0778: AAd reported a potential disk cache
    collision that could be exploited by remote attackers to steal
    confidential data or execute code.
    - MFSA 2007-04/CVE-2007-0779: David Eckel reported that browser UI
    elements as the host name and security indicators be
    spoofed by using a large, mostly transparent, custom cursor and
    adjusting the CSS3 hot-spot property so that the visible part of
    the cursor floated outside the browser content area.
    - MFSA 2007-05: Manually opening blocked popups could be exploited by
    remote attackers to allow XSS attacks (CVE-2007-0780) or to execute
    code in local files (CVE-2007-0800).
    - MFSA 2007-06:
    Two buffer overflows were found in the NSS handling of Mozilla.
    CVE-2007-0008: SSL clients such as Firefox and Thunderbird can suffer
    a buffer overflow if a malicious server presents a certificate
    with a public key that is too small to encrypt the entire "Master
    Secret". Exploiting this overflow appears to be unreliable but
    possible if the SSLv2 protocol is enabled.
    CVE-2007-0009: Servers that use NSS for the SSLv2 protocol can
    be exploited by a client that presents a "Client Master Key" with
    invalid length values in any of several fields that are used without
    adequate error checking. This can lead to a buffer overflow that
    presumably could be exploitable.
    - MFSA 2007-06/CVE-2007-0981: Michal Zalewski demonstrated that setting
    location.hostname to a value with embedded null characters can
    confuse the browsers domain checks. Setting the value triggers a
    load, but the networking software reads the hostname only up to
    the null character while other checks for "parent domain" start at
    the right and so can have a completely different idea of what the
    current host is.
    - MFSA 2007-08/CVE-2007-1092: Michal Zalewski reported a memory
    corruption vulnerability in Firefox 2.0.0.1 involving mixing
    the onUnload event handler and self-modifying document.write()
    calls. This flaw was introduced in Firefox 2.0.0.1 and 1.5.0.9 and
    does not affect earlier versions; it is fixed in Firefox 2.0.0.2
    and 1.5.0.10.
    - MFSA 2007-09/CVE-2007-0994: moz_bug_r_a4 reports that the fix for
    MFSA 2006-72 in Firefox 1.5.0.9 and Firefox 2.0.0.1 introduced a
    regression that allows scripts from web content to execute arbitrary
    code by setting the src attribute of an IMG tag to a specially
    crafted javascript: URI.
    The same regression also caused javascript: URIs in IMG tags to be
    executed even if JavaScript execution was disabled in the global
    preferences. This facet was noted by moz_bug_r_a4 and reported
    independently by Anbo Motohiko.
    2) Solution or Work-Around
    There is no known workaround, please install the update packages.
    3) Special Instructions and Notes
    Please close and restart all running instances of Firefox after the update.
    4) Package Location and Checksums
    The preferred method for installing security updates is to use the YaST
    Update (YU) tool. YU detects which updates are required and
    automatically performs the necessary steps to verify and install them.
    Alternatively, download the update packages for your distribution manually
    and verify their integrity by the methods listed in Section 6 of this
    announcement. Then install the packages using the command
    rpm -Fhv <file.rpm>
    to apply the update, replacing <file.rpmwith the filename of the
    downloaded RPM package.
    x86 Platform:
    openSUSE 10.2:
    SUSE LINUX 10.1:
    SUSE LINUX 10.0:
    SUSE LINUX 9.3:
    Power PC Platform:
    openSUSE 10.2:
    SUSE LINUX 10.1:
    SUSE LINUX 10.0:
    x86-64 Platform:
    openSUSE 10.2:
    Sources:
    openSUSE 10.2:
    SUSE LINUX 10.1:
    SUSE LINUX 10.0:
    SUSE LINUX 9.3:
    maintenance customers are notified individually. The packages are
    offered for installation from the maintenance web:
    Novell Linux Desktop 9
    Novell Linux Desktop 9 for x86
    SUSE SLES 10
    SUSE SLED 10
    5) Pending Vulnerabilities, Solutions, and Work-Arounds:
    See SUSE Security Summary Report.
    6) Authenticity Verification and Additional Information
    - Announcement authenticity verification:
    SUSE security announcements are published via mailing lists and on Web
    sites. The authenticity and integrity of a SUSE security announcement is
    guaranteed by a cryptographic signature in each announcement. All SUSE
    security announcements are published with a valid signature.
    To verify the signature of the announcement, save it as text into a file
    and run the command
    gpg <file>
    replacing <filewith the name of the file where you saved the
    announcement. The output for a valid signature looks like:
    gpg: Signature made <DATEusing RSA key ID 3D25D3D9
    gpg: Good signature from "SuSE Security Team <security (AT) suse (DOT) de>"
    where <DATEis replaced by the date the document was signed.
    If the security team's key is not contained in your key ring, you can
    import it from the first installation CD. To import the key, use the
    command
    gpg
    - Package authenticity verification:
    SUSE update packages are available on many mirror FTP servers all over the
    world. While this service is considered valuable and important to the free
    and open source software community, the authenticity and the integrity of
    a package needs to be verified to ensure that it has not been tampered
    with.
    There are two verification methods that can be used independently from
    each other to prove the authenticity of a downloaded file or RPM package:
    1) Using the internal gpg signatures of the rpm package
    2) MD5 checksums as provided in this announcement
    1) The internal rpm package signatures provide an easy way to verify the
    authenticity of an RPM package. Use the command
    rpm -v <file.rpm>
    to verify the signature of the package, replacing <file.rpmwith the
    filename of the RPM package downloaded. The package is unmodified if it
    contains a valid signature from build (AT) suse (DOT) de with the key ID 9C800ACA.
    This key is automatically imported into the RPM database (on
    RPMv4-based distributions) and the gpg key ring of 'root' during
    installation. You can also find it on the first installation CD and at
    the end of this announcement.
    2) If you need an alternative means of verification, use the md5sum
    command to verify the authenticity of the packages. Execute the command
    md5sum <filename.rpm>
    after you downloaded the file from a SUSE FTP server or its mirrors.
    Then compare the resulting md5sum with the one that is listed in the
    SUSE security announcement. Because the announcement containing the
    checksums is cryptographically signed (by security (AT) suse (DOT) de), the
    checksums show proof of the authenticity of the package if the
    signature of the announcement is valid. Note that the md5 sums
    published in the SUSE Security Announcements are valid for the
    respective packages only. Newer versions of these packages cannot be
    verified.
    - SUSE runs two security mailing lists to which any interested party may
    subscribe:
    opensuse-security (AT) opensuse (DOT) org
    - General Linux and SUSE security discussion.
    All SUSE security announcements are sent to this list.
    To subscribe, send an e-mail to
    <opensuse-security+subscribe (AT) opensuse (DOT) org>.
    suse-security-announce (AT) suse (DOT) com
    - SUSE's announce-only mailing list.
    SUSE's security announcements are sent to this list.
    To subscribe, send an e-mail to
    <@suse.com>.
    SUSE's security contact is <security (AT) suse (DOT) comor <security (AT) suse (DOT) de>.
    The <security (AT) suse (DOT) depublic key is listed below.
    The information in this advisory may be distributed or reproduced,
    provided that the advisory is not modified in any way. In particular, the
    clear text signature should show proof of the authenticity of the text.
    SUSE Linux Products GmbH provides no warranties of any kind whatsoever
    with respect to the information contained in this security advisory.
    Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID
    pub 2048R/3D25D3D9 1999-03-06 SuSE Security Team <security (AT) suse (DOT) de>
    pub 1024D/9C800ACA 2000-10-19 SuSE Package Signing Key <build (AT) suse (DOT) de>
    - PGP PUBLIC KEY BLCK
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
    +
    =ypVs
    - PGP PUBLIC KEY BLCK
    PGP SIGNATURE
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
    =MvXE
    PGP SIGNATURE

Re: SUSE Security Announcement: MozillaFirefox (SUSE-SA:2007:019)


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 3 + 2 =
QUESTION ON "Linux Security"

EMSDN.COM