Security

NAVIGATION
CATEGORIES
REFERRENCE
LINKS
  • Different terms for the same or more secure?

    1 answers - 880 bytes - related search similar search Add To My Delicious Add To My Stumble Upon Add To My Google Mark Add To My Facebook Add To My Digg Add To My Reddit

    Hi all,
    Seen a bit of traffic about vlans and as a junior networking person, I
    am wondering if they could be equal to physical subnets in the TCP/IP
    protocol.
    What further confuses me is that I read on Google that vlans can also
    have subnets.
    Could someone define each for me and the list and also why one is more
    secure than the other.
    Tnx
    Hylton
    This list is sponsored by: Norwich University
    EARN A MASTER F SCIENCE IN INFRMATIN ASSURANCE - NLINE
    The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence
    in Information Security. program offers unparalleled Infosec management
    education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience.
    Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree,
    without disrupting your career or home life.
  • No.1 | | 2490 bytes | |

    "Hylton Conacher(ZR1HPC)" <conacher.co.za!hyltonsaid (on 2006/08/21):

    What further confuses me is that I read on Google that vlans can also
    have subnets.

    Could someone define each for me and the list and also why one is more
    secure than the other.

    Tnx
    Hylton

    You're familiar with the 7-layer SI model? Vlans are a layer 2 entity;
    Subnets are layer 3. A vlan defines the broadcast domain of an ethernet
    frame (as one commonly-used layer 2 example). A subnet defines the
    broadcast domain of an IP (for example) packet. Collision domains are
    the synonymous layer 1 concept.

    Vlans and subnets are apples and oranges, so a security comparison between
    the two is meaningless.

    To illustrate, suppose A and B are on the same subnet, but different
    vlans. When A wants to talk to B, it will send an arp request with
    a broadcast mac address. All computers on A's vlan will see this arp
    request. Because B is on a different vlan, it will not see the arp request.

    Instead, we need a router (R, let's say) who has interface(s) on A's vlan
    and B's vlan. R will have to answer A's arp with its own mac address. A
    will create a frame with R's mac as destination, containing an IP packet
    with B's IP address as destination. The frame will reach R, who will
    change the destination mac address to B's mac and send it out on B's
    vlan. The process works in reverse when B wishes to talk to A.

    For the sake of sanity, many organizations align their layer 2 vlans
    with their layer 3 subnets. This makes it easier to conceptually grasp
    the network's layout.

    There's a lot more that could be said about network design, but I'll end it
    here having reasonably answered your question. Trying to combine layer 2
    and layer 3 has to be one of the most common confusions afflicting young
    (well, new to the field, at least) network minions.

    This list is sponsored by: Norwich University

    EARN A MASTER F SCIENCE IN INFRMATIN ASSURANCE - NLINE
    The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence
    in Information Security. program offers unparalleled Infosec management
    education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience.
    Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree,
    without disrupting your career or home life.

Re: Different terms for the same or more secure?


max 4000 letters.
Your nickname that display:
In order to stop the spam: 3 + 2 =
QUESTION ON "Security"

EMSDN.COM