Francois De Serres wrote:
All your **kwargs are belong to us.
*args is documented in the Tutorial. I reckon **kwargs represents a
dictionary of arguments. But I don't quite get the semantics of **x.
Undefined length tuple of undefined length tuples? Are there other
practical use cases for ** (common enough please, I wish I was, but I'm
not a scientist).
Where did you get "tuples of tuples" for **x ? It doesn't have tuples
at all, but is merely a dictionary, as you said in the first place. Are
you implying you think **kwargs and **x are somehow magically different?
-Peter

Peter Hansen wrote:
Francois De Serres wrote:


>*args is documented in the Tutorial. I reckon **kwargs represents a
>dictionary of arguments. But I don't quite get the semantics of **x.
>Undefined length tuple of undefined length tuples? Are there other
>practical use cases for ** (common enough please, I wish I was, but
>I'm not a scientist).

Where did you get "tuples of tuples" for **x ?

I would guess it is confusion from languages where unary * means
dereference and ** means double dereference.

To the P: I'm glad you have been reading the tutorial. If you have
further questions the reference manual is a good place to look:

Just as you can use a name other than self as the first argument to an
unbound method, you can call your *args and **kwargs *x and **y instead,
but they will still act just like *args and **kwargs.

The stars are magic, not the names.

Michael Hoffman wrote:

>Peter Hansen wrote:

>
>>Francois De Serres wrote:
>>
>
>>
>

args is documented in the Tutorial. I reckon **kwargs represents a
dictionary of arguments. But I don't quite get the semantics of **x.
Undefined length tuple of undefined length tuples? Are there other
practical use cases for ** (common enough please, I wish I was, but
I'm not a scientist).


>>Where did you get "tuples of tuples" for **x ?
>
>>
>
>I would guess it is confusion from languages where unary * means
>dereference and ** means double dereference.

That was precisely my mistake.

>To the P: I'm glad you have been reading the tutorial. If you have
>further questions the reference manual is a good place to look:
>
>

Now I see, there's a '**' token, which is not the same as two adjacents
'*' tokens.

>Just as you can use a name other than self as the first argument to an
>unbound method, you can call your *args and **kwargs *x and **y instead,
>but they will still act just like *args and **kwargs.
>
>The stars are magic, not the names.

Thanks mucho!
F.