I've completed significant bug fixes today and am ready to cut the 1.1.0
release. I plan to post the release within the next day or two using:
$mvn release:prepare
$mvn clean install -P assembly
$mvn release:perform
for the creation of the binary and source distributions.
Before I do so, I will make sure the release plugin is configured to
deploy to a *staging* area vs. the live repo.
If someone has a chance, it'd be great to have a second set of eyes look
over the binary distribtions (run the 2nd command above) before I make
the cut. This may help save some iterations in case I missed something.
Thanks,
David

I've gone through all the src/main/java files and ensured they have
them. You're obviously finding some that I missed. . .can you please
point me in the right direction?

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Before we can release we have to follow the new licence policy:

so all headers in our source files have to be changed. (There is a
script somewhere doing the work)

Carsten

David H. DeWolf wrote:
>I've completed significant bug fixes today and am ready to cut the 1.1.0
>release. I plan to post the release within the next day or two using:
>>
>$mvn release:prepare
>$mvn clean install -P assembly
>$mvn release:perform
>>
>for the creation of the binary and source distributions.
>>
>Before I do so, I will make sure the release plugin is configured to
>deploy to a *staging* area vs. the live repo.
>>
>If someone has a chance, it'd be great to have a second set of eyes look
>over the binary distribtions (run the 2nd command above) before I make
>the cut. This may help save some iterations in case I missed something.
>>
>>
>Thanks,
>>
>>
>David
>>

Gotcha! I see now.

If anyone knows where the tool is to transform them, that would be a
huge help. I'll hopefully have a chance to take a look later
on today.

David

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
David H. DeWolf wrote:
>I've gone through all the src/main/java files and ensured they have
>them. You're obviously finding some that I missed. . .can you please
>point me in the right direction?
I think all files are still wrong :) The policy is to not have a
copyright statement there, so the header should be (according to
):

Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
or more contributor license agreements. See the NTICE file
distributed with this work for additional information
regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
software distributed under the License is distributed on an
"AS IS" BASIS, WITHUT WARRANTIES R CNDITINS F ANY
KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations
under the License.

Currently we have somethink like:

/*
* Copyright 2004 The Apache Software Foundation.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
*
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHUT WARRANTIES R CNDITINS F ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/

Carsten

>Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Before we can release we have to follow the new licence policy:

so all headers in our source files have to be changed. (There is a
script somewhere doing the work)

Carsten

David H. DeWolf wrote:
I've completed significant bug fixes today and am ready to cut the 1.1.0
release. I plan to post the release within the next day or two using:

$mvn release:prepare
$mvn clean install -P assembly
$mvn release:perform

for the creation of the binary and source distributions.

Before I do so, I will make sure the release plugin is configured to
deploy to a *staging* area vs. the live repo.

If someone has a chance, it'd be great to have a second set of eyes look
over the binary distribtions (run the 2nd command above) before I make
the cut. This may help save some iterations in case I missed something.

Thanks,

David